Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Space Flight and Operations
Reload this Page >

Astra rocket shuffles sideways off the pad...

Wikiposts
Search
Space Flight and Operations News and Issues Following Space Flight, Testing, Operations and Professional Development

Astra rocket shuffles sideways off the pad...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Aug 2021, 09:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Gnome de PPRuNe
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Too close to Croydon for comfort
Age: 60
Posts: 12,643
Received 300 Likes on 168 Posts
Astra rocket shuffles sideways off the pad...

What happens when you lose one on take off?


Good save!
treadigraph is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2021, 10:16
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,507
Received 187 Likes on 105 Posts
Watched it last night, definately an 'uh oh' moment. 😳
Excellent analysis from Scott Manley as usual.


Last edited by TURIN; 29th Aug 2021 at 10:32.
TURIN is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2021, 10:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,508
Received 114 Likes on 70 Posts
Always wondered the same thing about the Space Shuttle. Apparently those boosters "could not fail"...........(until one did at altitude. RIP).
Uplinker is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2021, 18:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Stagnation Point
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
(happy voice) "..next objective is Max Q!"
Droop Snoot is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2021, 19:02
  #5 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 428 Likes on 226 Posts
They should have used a longer stick.
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 29th Aug 2021, 19:06
  #6 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,446
Received 1,603 Likes on 735 Posts
The should rename it the “knight” (one square sideways then two up)….
ORAC is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2021, 04:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,420
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by TURIN
Watched it last night, definately an 'uh oh' moment. 😳
Excellent analysis from Scott Manley as usual.
Yep, pretty obvious that there simply wasn't enough thrust - I surmised one engine either failed outright or wasn't producing much thrust, so Scott confirmed that. Agree with the kudos to the guidance team - pretty impressive that it was able to maintain control and leave the launch area.

Always wondered the same thing about the Space Shuttle. Apparently those boosters "could not fail"
In the Challenger aftermath, it came out that there was a USAF study that predicted that the odds of a catastrophic of a strap-on booster was about 1 in 50. IIRC, Challenger was SS flight number 35...
Also, there was a requirement that the solid boosters needed to ignite within a few milliseconds of each other - or the asymmetric thrust would rip the spacecraft apart... That's a non-trivial problem with ammonium percolate solid propellant motors.
tdracer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.