Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Space Flight and Operations
Reload this Page >

From Astronauts to Astro-Noughts

Wikiposts
Search
Space Flight and Operations News and Issues Following Space Flight, Testing, Operations and Professional Development

From Astronauts to Astro-Noughts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jul 2021, 15:19
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: .
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Really, what is the purpose of sending humans to the Moon or Mars? Yes it's cool and undoubtedly a wonderful experience for the participants, but really? It's many times more efficient to send machines to do the science and find out what's up there. Well, you say we need to take the first steps to become a multi planet species, because Earth will eventually become unlivable. Maybe, but at $10K/pound just to lift something into Earth orbit, colonization of other planets won't be happening until we can figure out something better than chemical rockets. How many will raise their hand to go live on Mars or the Moon permanently?

There's a big race on between two billionaires to get back to the Moon, driven solely by ego. They'll get there eventually. What exactly will those astronauts do besides high 5 each other, take some pretty pictures, and confirm it's the same grey dirt and rocks as 50 years ago?
Dorf is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2021, 00:06
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,505
Received 175 Likes on 96 Posts
Dorf, may I politely suggest you do some research on reusable spacecraft, in particular SpaceX Starship and the Blue Origin New Glenn.
Also, the cost of sending items to LEO. In particular the relative costs of traditional and wasteful launchers such as ULA or Ariane, then compare that to SpaceX Falcon 9, reusable boosters that can and have been used ten times.
TURIN is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2021, 16:06
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: .
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TURIN
Dorf, may I politely suggest you do some research on reusable spacecraft, in particular SpaceX Starship and the Blue Origin New Glenn.
Also, the cost of sending items to LEO. In particular the relative costs of traditional and wasteful launchers such as ULA or Ariane, then compare that to SpaceX Falcon 9, reusable boosters that can and have been used ten times.
Ok then, $5K/pound. My question remains, what do they do when they get there that robots can't do 10X more efficiently?
Dorf is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2021, 19:38
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,505
Received 175 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by Dorf
Ok then, $5K/pound. My question remains, what do they do when they get there that robots can't do 10X more efficiently?
Survive an extinction level event on Earth?
TURIN is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.