Explosion at kennedy Space Center


Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 151
From: A better place.
Jeez - just read that Saturn V paper - thanks for posting Wiggy.
Now that would have been one helluva bang!
Did I read right - 33 secs duration, 1400ft diameter, 1 atmosphere of over pressure at 2500 dg F!
Mental image of beehive hair-do-ed gal typing out report, authored by white short sleeved shirt, skinny black tied, horn-rimmed glasses rocket scientist.
With short back & sides, and pen protector of course.
Have seen that quote before but still love it... cheapest govt contractor.
Now that would have been one helluva bang!
Did I read right - 33 secs duration, 1400ft diameter, 1 atmosphere of over pressure at 2500 dg F!
Mental image of beehive hair-do-ed gal typing out report, authored by white short sleeved shirt, skinny black tied, horn-rimmed glasses rocket scientist.
With short back & sides, and pen protector of course.
Have seen that quote before but still love it... cheapest govt contractor.

Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 117
Likes: 11
From: UK
Quote:
The blast took with it Facebook’s first satellite costing the company a whopping £150 million.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/171096...spacex-rocket/
The blast took with it Facebook’s first satellite costing the company a whopping £150 million.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/171096...spacex-rocket/
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: bespin, the cloud city
Thank whatever God you worship, that Farcebook has been stymied in its extension into Outer Space.
What a shame that a large number of Farcebook servers weren't blown up in the rocket explosion as well.
I am glad to hear that there were no injuries, and the losses were only financial.
What a shame that a large number of Farcebook servers weren't blown up in the rocket explosion as well.
I am glad to hear that there were no injuries, and the losses were only financial.

Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 36
Likes: 22
From: NZ
Keeping in mind too ...
- Where does our SLF post those holiday snaps that inspire their friends and associates to travel with us? Facebook (and instagram -- same company)
- Where do the travel bloggers post links to their videos, photos, and blogs that promote travel? Facebook.
- Where do the travel agents post advertising promoting their services? Facebook
- Where do our airlines post advertising to promote their services on their websites? Facebook.
- Where do businesses start their advertising? Facebook.
Facebook offers incredibly targeted advertising - without it I suspect that more than a few of us would be out of a job due to decreased demand for bums on seats.
- Where does our SLF post those holiday snaps that inspire their friends and associates to travel with us? Facebook (and instagram -- same company)
- Where do the travel bloggers post links to their videos, photos, and blogs that promote travel? Facebook.
- Where do the travel agents post advertising promoting their services? Facebook
- Where do our airlines post advertising to promote their services on their websites? Facebook.
- Where do businesses start their advertising? Facebook.
Facebook offers incredibly targeted advertising - without it I suspect that more than a few of us would be out of a job due to decreased demand for bums on seats.


Joined: Mar 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 155
From: Brisbane, Qld, Australia
How do crooks know when and where you will be when travelling, on which flight and to which destination for one of those wonderful holidays all found on F@(Eb00K ??
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
In the USLaunchReport video (see link below), there is about a 5.5 second delay between what is seen and what is heard - the camera is about 1.5 miles away. About 5 seconds before the report of the initial explosion, there is a very large bang sound, like someone striking a garbage pail with a hammer. The sound clearly originates in the distance, something that is made more likely by the fact that the launch site and surround would have been basically abandoned for a live fire test.
Now, visually, there is no event at the launch site that corresponds to this loud sound. It would have come at about 1:06, 5 seconds before the explosion. What could make such a large noise yet leave no visual record?
Some time ago, the SpaceX Falcon 9 CRS-7 mission failed when, just as in this case, the 2nd stage LOX tank failed during flight. The helium pressurization for these 2nd stage LOX tanks is derived from a smaller vessel that is actually housed within the tank and secured to it with steel struts. When the LOX tank is full, there is a large buoyant force on this vessel, like a football held under water, and this puts great stress on the support infrastructure. The in-flight failure was caused by failure of the securing struts, at which point the now-free helium vessel rocketed (ha) to the surface of the liquid oxygen pool and slammed into the LOX tank wall, fatally weakening it.
It seems possible that the loud noise heard on the video is the audible report of the same event. 5 seconds later, the tank fails.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BgJEXQkjNQ
Now, visually, there is no event at the launch site that corresponds to this loud sound. It would have come at about 1:06, 5 seconds before the explosion. What could make such a large noise yet leave no visual record?
Some time ago, the SpaceX Falcon 9 CRS-7 mission failed when, just as in this case, the 2nd stage LOX tank failed during flight. The helium pressurization for these 2nd stage LOX tanks is derived from a smaller vessel that is actually housed within the tank and secured to it with steel struts. When the LOX tank is full, there is a large buoyant force on this vessel, like a football held under water, and this puts great stress on the support infrastructure. The in-flight failure was caused by failure of the securing struts, at which point the now-free helium vessel rocketed (ha) to the surface of the liquid oxygen pool and slammed into the LOX tank wall, fatally weakening it.
It seems possible that the loud noise heard on the video is the audible report of the same event. 5 seconds later, the tank fails.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BgJEXQkjNQ
Last edited by deSitter; 2nd September 2016 at 15:23.

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,729
Likes: 104
From: The Winchester
DeSitter - Agreed.
LOX has been widely used as convenient short hand for straightforward unadulterated liquid oxygen in the spaceflight industry for decades so I don't think this is a case of the journalists getting it wrong.
If you have a look towards the back of the NASA technical paper on fireballs I linked to a few posts back you'll see "LOX" used both in one of the references and also in the graphs....
LOX has been widely used as convenient short hand for straightforward unadulterated liquid oxygen in the spaceflight industry for decades so I don't think this is a case of the journalists getting it wrong.
If you have a look towards the back of the NASA technical paper on fireballs I linked to a few posts back you'll see "LOX" used both in one of the references and also in the graphs....
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 1
From: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
From: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: Canada
It seems possible that the loud noise heard on the video is the audible report of the same event. 5 seconds later, the tank fails.
It's possible it's a related problem, but, from what I've read, the failure seemed to start around the umbilical attachments, which would make them a prime candidate. If it disconnected and started spraying liquid oxygen around, that would have been bad news.
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: England
the big explosion was the satellite hitting the ground and it's ~2 tonnes of hypergolic fuel exploding.
the initial flash-fire looks like it's from outside the second stage where the LOX umbilical is connected.
one can only speculate that either there was a failure in the umbilical/coupling or some contaminate came into contact with the O2 venting, a lot of things get very incendiary in a pure O2 environment.
the initial flash-fire looks like it's from outside the second stage where the LOX umbilical is connected.
one can only speculate that either there was a failure in the umbilical/coupling or some contaminate came into contact with the O2 venting, a lot of things get very incendiary in a pure O2 environment.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
There are three main explosive reports in the initial event 1) the initial tank rupture 2) a much larger report 3 seconds later, possibly from the RSO operating the self-destruct mechanism and 3) the report from the satellite stage toppling to the ground about 11 seconds after the first report.
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Aggregating some marginal gains.
Nicely spotted AirBubba! I counted 12 seconds from flash to bang on the video myself though. So at 340.3 m/s at sea level (I assumed sea level as I have no idea of the elevation there) it makes 2.2 NM (2.5 statute). Looks like that cheeky speed of sound was sticking to the rules after all ;-)



