Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > South Asia and the Far East
Reload this Page >

Gladiator, just in case you missed this

Wikiposts
Search
South Asia and the Far East News and views on the fast growing and changing aviation scene on the planet.

Gladiator, just in case you missed this

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Sep 2000, 18:22
  #1 (permalink)  
1-stripper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool Gladiator, just in case you missed this



Article of note: Seattle Times

Copyright © 2000 The Seattle Times Company

Local News : Friday, September 08, 2000

FAA declares Alaska supervisor falsified maintenance record

by Steve Miletich

Seattle Times staff reporter

The Federal Aviation Administration has found that an Alaska Airlines
supervisor falsified an aircraft-maintenance record in 1998.

The finding isn't related to the Jan. 31 crash of Alaska Flight 261. But it
marks the first time the FAA has upheld an allegation brought by a company
whistle-blower 16 months before the crash.

"The FAA's finding contradicts Alaska's longstanding claim that the
whistle-blower's allegations had no merit, and comes at a time when the
airline's maintenance practices are the subject of a federal criminal
investigation."
 
Old 11th Sep 2000, 22:21
  #2 (permalink)  
ironbutt57
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

It proves Glad now works in a democracy..where people can still speak their mind, and occasionally the truth prevails...don't think you'll ever see this occurring in an asian country.....
 
Old 12th Sep 2000, 02:50
  #3 (permalink)  
titan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Hail the Democracy!

The difference betwen Alaskan and SIA is that at SIA the breaking of rules has become institutionalised.

"to hell with the rules, lets just make a bigger profit"
 
Old 12th Sep 2000, 16:26
  #4 (permalink)  
casual observer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

The question here is why it took a crash before FAA acted on the whistle-blower's allegations. Democracy or not, Alaska did it to maximize their profits, and FAA failed to properly monitor Alaska for compliance.
 
Old 12th Sep 2000, 17:46
  #5 (permalink)  
ITI_IKA
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Arrow

looks like Gladiator's jumped out of the frying pan into the fire. www.webpac.net/~skydream. ALASKA 506
 
Old 13th Sep 2000, 08:40
  #6 (permalink)  
asianpilot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs down

Ironbutt, there is one big difference in Asia though. When an organisation is caught in the wrong, the head will take the responsibility. In your democracy, i.e. the mighty U.S.of A, no one takes any responsibility. It is always someone else' fault.

 
Old 13th Sep 2000, 11:42
  #7 (permalink)  
Kaptin M
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink

Not quite correct, asianpilot. Generally, the blame [in S.E. Asian countries] is shifted away from the "head" to a lesser minion [and usually ONLY one].....as long as a head - any head - is seen to roll, face is [thought] to be saved and justice done, even though the majority are aware where the real blame lies.

In western culture, it is generally accepted that if there has been a "fiddle" going on, chances are [more than likely] that more than one person is involved, and as such several heads usually end up getting the chop.
 
Old 13th Sep 2000, 12:59
  #8 (permalink)  
noodles
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

asianpilot,
Beware sweeping statements such as "no one takes responsibility...".

Is this 100% true everytime? If not, your argument is dissolved.

Did the CEO resign when the company found out one of its staff had embezzled tens of millions of dollars or did the head of Silkair resign when his organisations plane crashed?

Kaptin, I tend to agree with your observation. It centres around the issue of accountability. Empower staff and the 'head' shouldn't need to roll.

Does SIA empower its staff? Or does communication filter through many management layers? How much trust does SIA give its staff?

 
Old 14th Sep 2000, 02:15
  #9 (permalink)  
Gladiator
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Is that your best?

The people of SIA trying to rub the issues of a certain air carrier into Gladiator's face. I fail to see the connection.

However SIA's operation continues to short change the fare paying passengers of minimum international safety standards.

Nice try though, try again.
 
Old 14th Sep 2000, 03:09
  #10 (permalink)  
Kaptin M
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Red face

Ohhh, I see - so Glad, your crusade to bring "minimum international safety standards" issues to the fore, applies only to Singapore Airlines, your past employer, and not to Alaskan, your present.

Surely the issues raised re Alaska Air, in this and previous posts, should be sufficient to have you resigning, and taking legal action against them for representing themselves as a safe operator, and luring you - with ALL your experience - to work for them.

You haven't just been bs'ing us all along, about your high levels of integrity........have you ?
 
Old 14th Sep 2000, 04:22
  #11 (permalink)  
titan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

The very nature of any Authoritarian system, with which Asia is littered, is that the System can never be wrong, and that a scape goat must be found. Authoritarian systems survive on corruption, thereby perpetuating the power base of the heirarchy. The higher up the chain of command the greater the influence that can be wielded and therefore the lesser the chance of taking responsibility. In these systems it is the people at the bottom of the structure that take the fall - the little people.
With all that has gone on at SIA, I note that the upper Management has not changed. They are preserving their power base.
Two questions to ponder:
1 - How much money has Maurice DeVaz made from the CRM course?
2 - How much money has Len McCully made from the Lear Jets?

In a democracy we are free to ask such questions.
 
Old 14th Sep 2000, 06:30
  #12 (permalink)  
Gladiator
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Kaptin M you are acting like a child again.

If and when, if ever I decide my present employer is not meeting safety standards, be sure you will be the first to hear about it.

Do not even attempt to compare the two. It would be like comparing a 'rickshaw'(SIA) to a 'Ferrari 328'.

You along with the SAKKA squad of Ku-Lees are so desperate.

Nice try, try again next time.
 
Old 14th Sep 2000, 06:51
  #13 (permalink)  
1-stripper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

Dear Mr. Gladiator, sir:

First of all, I don't work for SIA. I don't believe SIA has any pilot wear 1-stripe on his uniform. Secondly, I am only assisting you in gathering info related to Alaska's violation, just in case one day, you DECIDE your employer is not meeting safety standards. Thirdly, based on your second sentence, Alsaka is a safe airlines, even though FAA doesn't believe so. Hence, you safety standard is below the FAA standard.

Thank you for your attention, Mr. Gladiator, sir. I will not engage in any further conversation with you. I wish you success in all your future endeavors.

1-Stripper

P.S. Any type of discrimination is a federal offence in the US of A.


[This message has been edited by 1-stripper (edited 14 September 2000).]
 
Old 14th Sep 2000, 07:00
  #14 (permalink)  
Sunny
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Red face

Hey Titan,
your statement that "the higher up the chain of command the greater the influence that can be wielded and therefore the lesser chance of taking responsibility" reminds me of a few well publicised events. Bill Clinton and Monica, Nixon and Watergate. Well looks like they too managed to survive. So how corrupt are they? So much for democracy. If you're so free to ask questions, then who killed JFK? Looks like democracy and free speech don't work as well as they should. Gladiator, if you're going to make such claims that SIA is short changing passengers of international safety standards, then why don't you talk to the relevant authorities, the media etc, and get them to fix it. No point bitching about it here. Get it out of the way, then maybe we all can get on to other topics of discussion.
 
Old 14th Sep 2000, 08:29
  #15 (permalink)  
Kaptin M
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs down

Nothing childish there, Glad. The fact that Alaska Airlines has twice in the past 6 months or so, been hauled over the coals by the FAA, and SQ has not, belies your calls of foul!

Unless you follow through and pull the pin on Alaskan, you have now been well and truly defeated in this public arena.

As we have all come to see over the past several months, humility is NOT one of your attributes, and so - no doubt at all - you'll rant and rave about many and varied spurious topics....

...but when it came to the core issue of why you absconded from Singapore Airlines, it wasn't really a safety issue at all, as these incidents with your current employer have proven. It was a convenient front, to try to give you an out for not honouring your word, and forking out the bond.

That's TWO defeats, Glad...one in the court room, and another on this forum!!

YOU'RE OUT !!
 
Old 14th Sep 2000, 09:19
  #16 (permalink)  
Gladiator
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Kaptin M for the 20th time,

Singapore Employment Law

11. Termination of contract without notice.

(2) Either party to a contract of service may terminate such contract of service without notice in the event of any wilful breach by the other party of a condition of the contract of service.

I can understand you are having a hard time being sour grapes. Get on your rickshaw and come to term with and accept the above paragraph.

1-Stripper CAKAP COTEX lah.

 
Old 14th Sep 2000, 09:29
  #17 (permalink)  
asianpilot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs down

Gladiator,
What Kaptin M said is very true. If you want to be CREDIBLE, you have to be CONSISTENT. You cannot apply double standards to further your cause. The SAKKAS and the KuLees want to look up to you but so far you have done nothing to be praiseworthy. Snap out of your cowardice and stand up to your principles that safety is your paramount concern. Tell us and show us you are against Alaska Airlines' unsafe practice. If you do that, you will still be IN. If not, as KM puts it, you are OUT.

I see you have changed your story from SQ being an unsafe airline to quoting the Singapore Employment Act. This is what we call a "putar belit" tactic.

Edited for omission-ap

[This message has been edited by asianpilot (edited 14 September 2000).]

[This message has been edited by asianpilot (edited 14 September 2000).]
 
Old 14th Sep 2000, 17:55
  #18 (permalink)  
1-stripper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

Can someone explain to me what "CAKAP COTEX lah" means? Thanks!
 
Old 14th Sep 2000, 22:01
  #19 (permalink)  
ironbutt57
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

my my my how good does it get.. asian pile-it and kaptin m on the the same thread where you been asian pile-it? thought er hoped you were gone oh well can't have everything...anyway..see you are still unable to face the truth...yess the FAA apparently dropped the ball and innocent lives were lost..but it's public knowledge as to how and why don't think that will be the case WHEN SQ stoves one in..that big old alcatraz for a country you live in will go into major lockdown...people will "retire" with fatter pockets and blame laid everywhere except where it belongs...glad to see you back asian pile-it
 
Old 15th Sep 2000, 07:09
  #20 (permalink)  
Whiskery
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink

Ah.....Gladys,it gets hot in the desert this time of the year habibi! Maybe it will cool down soon.......enshalla.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.