Wikiposts
Search
South Asia and the Far East News and views on the fast growing and changing aviation scene on the planet.

AIR CHINA CARGO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th May 2006, 09:46
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The relentless posting of such statements does not actually imply, that there are really good jobs.
As long as authorities can afford to protect their local pilots markets against foreigners (India, China and many more), the so called "lack of qualified pilots" seems to be nothing more than a myth to me.
Or check this from directpersonnel.com:
Type Rated B747-400 First Officers
Job details:
Our client has a requirement for B747-400 First Officers for their operation in China.
Required experience:
We are currently accepting expressions of interest for the following: We will accept 'low hour' First Officers, however, they must satisfy the following criteria: A B747-400 Type Rating 3,000 hours Total Time on all aircraft 1,500 hours on a Jet Aircraft weighing more than 93,000 LBS and current on this aircraft (Last flight within the past 6 months) Class 1 medical No record of accident or incident. This is an excellent oppertunity to discover the Far East, working for a national carrier. I look forward to receiving your 1 page resumes. ***ONLY CANDIDATES SATISFYING THE ABOVE CRITERA NEED APPLY***
Location:
China
Type of contract:
Long term
Start date:
ASAP
Duration:
min 12 months
We offer:
An excellent remuneration package

What does that mean?
They urge those "keen on widebody hours pilots willing to fly for food" to make a B747-400-rating on their own expenses and then apply.
As long as industry can make such fatal offers, the economic aspect (cost savings) still weighs out the aspect of a smooth and safe operation with no cancelled flights due to lack of personnel
skycruiser65 is offline  
Old 29th May 2006, 13:37
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question What Does it Really Mean????

Originally Posted by skycruiser65
The relentless posting of such statements does not actually imply, that there are really good jobs.
As long as authorities can afford to protect their local pilots markets against foreigners (India, China and many more), the so called "lack of qualified pilots" seems to be nothing more than a myth to me.
Or check this from directpersonnel.com:
Type Rated B747-400 First Officers
Job details:
Our client has a requirement for B747-400 First Officers for their operation in China.
Required experience:
We are currently accepting expressions of interest for the following: We will accept 'low hour' First Officers, however, they must satisfy the following criteria: A B747-400 Type Rating 3,000 hours Total Time on all aircraft 1,500 hours on a Jet Aircraft weighing more than 93,000 LBS and current on this aircraft (Last flight within the past 6 months) Class 1 medical No record of accident or incident. This is an excellent oppertunity to discover the Far East, working for a national carrier. I look forward to receiving your 1 page resumes. ***ONLY CANDIDATES SATISFYING THE ABOVE CRITERA NEED APPLY***
Location:
China
Type of contract:
Long term
Start date:
ASAP
Duration:
min 12 months
We offer:
An excellent remuneration package

What does that mean?
They urge those "keen on widebody hours pilots willing to fly for food" to make a B747-400-rating on their own expenses and then apply.
As long as industry can make such fatal offers, the economic aspect (cost savings) still weighs out the aspect of a smooth and safe operation with no cancelled flights due to lack of personnel
It means they (DPI & others) are trawling!!
It's simply to get guys to whip up their resumes/CVs to see what's out there....they play the game, just like the pilots do.
I've lost count of the number of "airlines" whose ads I have answered, willing to go half-way around the globe (sometimes more) who have NEVER responded to my documentation. Then two months down the road they come up with the exact SAME ad with the addition of "new and improved terms & conditions"!! What does that tell you??
And in case anyone says that they do not have the manpower to respond to all candidates, taht's just B.S.!! They are a business and that is part of their job! Most pilots who respond are genuine, interested in the position and want to find out more. Most are also qualified for the position - they are not wannabes.....
I had one instance about a year ago when an "agency" apparently lost my paperwork and then back-peddled saying that their client had rejected my application. But......I had to drag it out of them! They "forgot" to send me the rejection email. They did this twice for two different contracts on two different aircraft. I was notimpressed and this was one of the better ones.
In my experience, recent and past, these airlines and some agencies are fairly inefficient at what they do. Quite a few do not follow through and the amount they must be spending on advertising around the world and on the net, would make many a start-up airline blush
Moral of the story: do not believe everything you read or that they tell you. It does not necessarily mean that there are open positions available and agencies as well as clinet airlines change their minds all the time, ACC is a case in point and they are not the only ones.
alexb757 is offline  
Old 29th May 2006, 15:28
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HitList
Skycruiser65 and Alexb757,

Both are bringing up very valid core points of underperforming operations and some clueless crew contractors which are definitely
trawling and playing games. But, All are just wasting their time.

The Bottom Line is , All are not producing anything, are behind in their so-called expansion plans and the winners are only the Competent Operations which are clearly identifiable thru their Actual Results.

(Now, ACC's latest effort: Air China Cargo - China Cargo of China Eastern - Dragonair Cargo, to merge for a better future.)
I think you are right actually. So much for "saving" money by screwing your most valuable resource - the drivers without whom you cannot even start! Oh great, let's all merge now. We'll all save money now........yeah, right.
alexb757 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.