Wikiposts
Search
South Asia and the Far East News and views on the fast growing and changing aviation scene on the planet.

RBA & Airbus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jan 2005, 06:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ORD - Oil Rich Den
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RBA & Airbus

Not too long ago the CEO stated a complete fleet revamp. The aging Boeings out for 18 new Airbus, 12narrow body & 6 wide body. I know RBA has taken delivery of A320/319s. Which are the wide body aircrafts - A340 or A330. When are they due?
MASsenger is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2005, 11:51
  #2 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,179
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
The royal aircraft use to be or still is an A340.

However I see the 330/350 are being the aircraft of choice for the 767 replacement. Freight space is the problem, an A330-300 will hold the same amount of freight as a 777-200.

swh is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2005, 15:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North of Equator
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

An A330-300 can hold 163 cubic meter in its cargo hold ( all inclusive ) , the 777-200 will hold 200 cubic meter unless its a dedicated freight aircraft. Just to set the record straight. Cheers !
rainforest is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2005, 04:36
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ORD - Oil Rich Den
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the Royal aircraft is the A340 till today. It makes sense for RBA to go for A340s. I guess the A350 would be a strong contender, being next generation technology. The CEO`s announcement was made before the A350 was conjured. However, these days making sense or technology has nothing to do with choice of aircrafts. There`s always more than meets the eye!
MASsenger is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2005, 05:57
  #5 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,179
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
rainforest,

An A330-300 can hold 163 cubic meter in its cargo hold ( all inclusive ) , the 777-200 will hold 200 cubic meter unless its a dedicated freight aircraft. Just to set the record straight. Cheers !
I would be pleased to be corrected if I am wrong, I was of the understand that the A330-300 was 162.9 m^3, 777-200 150 m^3, 777-300 200.5 m^3.

This Boeing link suggests 150 m^3 for the 777-200.

Just to set the record straight.

swh is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2005, 12:17
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North of Equator
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Yes, you are right regarding the cargo space ! I was looking at the -300 instead. My apologies to you and all the ppruners.
foresty.
rainforest is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2005, 08:11
  #7 (permalink)  
DIRECTOR
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: U.K.
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re Clem Clements Does he still brush his "Knashers" all the time to keep them gleeming??
thegypsy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.