PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Search: Posts Made By: fmgc

Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search took 0.00 seconds.

Forum: Tech Log

26th Oct 2012, 10:36

Replies: 29

New landing distance calculations for Airbus

Views: 17,514

Posted By fmgc

That does rather change the meaning of your...

That does rather change the meaning of your original guideline comment. We could bat this around for ages especially if we boil it down to semantics.

It was SOP, just using different tables.

Forum: Tech Log

26th Oct 2012, 10:15

Replies: 29

New landing distance calculations for Airbus

Views: 17,514

Posted By fmgc

I don't disagree with what you are saying. But...

I don't disagree with what you are saying. But even if a change to Part B is made the Authority can and do ask for amendments to be made.

Notwithstanding all that, just because an SOP is accepted...

Forum: Tech Log

26th Oct 2012, 08:26

Replies: 29

New landing distance calculations for Airbus

Views: 17,514

Posted By fmgc

9.G What I am saying is that you shouldn't...

9.G

What I am saying is that you shouldn't ever deviate from your Operator's SOPs.

And the Operator's SOPs ARE most definitely approved by the Authority! Under EASA you have to submit an NPA...

Forum: Tech Log

25th Oct 2012, 22:07

Replies: 29

New landing distance calculations for Airbus

Views: 17,514

Posted By fmgc

Now back to the OLDs. I have just done my...

Now back to the OLDs.

I have just done my first sim using them and they seem to work pretty well but do take a bit of getting used to.

There does seem to be an anomaly where if you have no...

Forum: Tech Log

25th Oct 2012, 22:00

Replies: 29

New landing distance calculations for Airbus

Views: 17,514

Posted By fmgc

Where does this come from? 99.99999999% of the...

Where does this come from? 99.99999999% of the time sticking to SOP is the most sound judgement and best airmanship.

Most people I see who quote this sort of rhetoric do so just to excuse their...

Showing results 1 to 5 of 5