PPRuNe Forums - Search Results
PPRuNe Forums

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Register
FAQ
Calendar
Wikiposts
Today's Posts
Search
Vendor Directory
Search: Posts Made By: Clinton McKenzie
Showing results 1 to 24 of 24
Search took 0.08 seconds.
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
19th Mar 2024, 03:43
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

CASA's answer:No acknowledgement that they got it...

CASA's answer:No acknowledgement that they got it wrong back in January 2023, though.
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
17th Jan 2024, 22:58
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

I sent this follow-up inquiry to the CASA...

I sent this follow-up inquiry to the CASA Guidance Centre this morning:
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
24th Jan 2023, 04:49
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

Hmmmm, if you go to Table 2.07 in MOS Part 91,...

Hmmmm, if you go to Table 2.07 in MOS Part 91, the 'flight visibility' column (4) is separate from the 'operational requirements' column (6). So if we take my favourite item for present purposes -...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
24th Jan 2023, 02:53
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

Hmmm, my guess is CASA's 'Regulatory Guidance...

Hmmm, my guess is CASA's 'Regulatory Guidance Delivery' folk will argue that the 'flight visibility' criterion - how far you can see forward from the cockpit - is different from the requirement to...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
24th Jan 2023, 01:48
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

CASA's 'Regulatory Guidance Delivery' folk...

CASA's 'Regulatory Guidance Delivery' folk omitted what I consider to be fundamentally important, intersecting definitions:(And "flight visibility" is defined to have the same meaning as in Annex 2...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
24th Jan 2023, 01:08
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

Given the complex, convoluted dog's breakfast...

Given the complex, convoluted dog's breakfast they've created, and continue to create, who wouldn't be confused, PiperCameron? The people answering the questions may be confident as to the validity...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
23rd Jan 2023, 23:12
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

Is that true? Are there no circumstances in...

Is that true?

Are there no circumstances in which it is 'legal' to cruise at 2,500' AMSL NVFR? If, for example, LSALT for A to B is 1,500' AMSL and forecast and actual cloud base is 5,000',...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
23rd Jan 2023, 02:07
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

Hot off the press from the CASA 'Regulatory...

Hot off the press from the CASA 'Regulatory Guidance Centre':I wouldn't have used the word "illustrated", but their point is clear. And "this height" may always be above 1,000 AGL, but it won't...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
23rd Jan 2023, 01:54
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

Nor does day VFR depend solely upon position...

Nor does day VFR depend solely upon position fixing by ground or water.

But I can see that you’ve come to the conclusion that the operational requirement in Item 4 of Table 2.07 of MOS Part 91...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
23rd Jan 2023, 00:55
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

That’s precisely my point! And, it’s a no no...

That’s precisely my point!

And, it’s a no no if you’re flying along at 3,500’ AMSL [sorry: I meant 3,000' AMSL] above 8/8ths of fog and can’t see any ground or water.
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
23rd Jan 2023, 00:36
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

If, as far as you can tell, the line in the sky...

If, as far as you can tell, the line in the sky relates to “nothing more than remaining clear of cloud”, you’re not reading and comprehending what Table 2.07 in MOS Part 91 says. Could you please...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
21st Jan 2023, 23:33
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

And, so far as I can tell, it’s no different...

And, so far as I can tell, it’s no different today. I’ve done it many times. But here is the key point re VFR:Above that line in the sky, the operational requirement in the definition of VMC in MOS...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
21st Jan 2023, 22:03
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

I think you’re referring to ENR 1.1-4.2. I see...

I think you’re referring to ENR 1.1-4.2. I see a distinction between the requirement to ‘operate’ in sight of the ‘generic’ ground or water whenever VFR at or below the higher of 3,000’ AMSL and...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
21st Jan 2023, 10:36
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

I instead ran CS’s ‘thought experiment’ for a day...

I instead ran CS’s ‘thought experiment’ for a day VFR flight in severe CAVOK. If I’m flying along below the higher of 3,000’ AMSL and 1,000’ AGL in e.g a Bonanza or RV9A, I cannot see the vast areas...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
20th Jan 2023, 20:57
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

What do you say about the operational requirement...

What do you say about the operational requirement in row 4 of Table 2.07 of the Part 91 MOS (https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2022C00789)? Is it applicable to NVFR flights in aircraft in G...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
20th Jan 2023, 09:12
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

I suspect CASA’s ‘strongly recommended’ might...

I suspect CASA’s ‘strongly recommended’ might become closer to ‘required by law’ at or below the higher of 3,000’ AMSL and 1,000’ AGL when operating NVFR in G. Hopefully CASA’s ‘Guidance Delivery...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
19th Jan 2023, 04:57
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

How? In the whatever way that they do. And...

How? In the whatever way that they do. And bloody well done and thank heavens for their work.

I hope they all get old.

And I'll make a wild guess and say they get a little more practise at it...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
19th Jan 2023, 04:15
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

Indeed (and haven't been staring at glowing...

Indeed (and haven't been staring at glowing screens in the cockpit).

That's why so many 'old and not so bold' pilots won't fly NVFR over 'lumpy gaffa' in and out of 'black holes' except on...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
19th Jan 2023, 04:10
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

You keep making points which merely beg the...

You keep making points which merely beg the (regulatory) question.

If you are indeed at or below 1,000' AGL while operating NVFR and there is - quite literally - nothing to see, then maybe - just...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
19th Jan 2023, 00:53
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

Incorrect assumption. But I am scared of the...

Incorrect assumption. But I am scared of the dark.

All of which merely begs the (regulatory) question.

And were you at or below 1,000' AGL when you took that photo? You were evidently above...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
17th Jan 2023, 01:36
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

We'll have to agree to disagree on that. You seem...

We'll have to agree to disagree on that. You seem to me to be construing a practise recommended to avoid an illusion during rotation and initial climb as meaning you don't have to be able to see the...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
16th Jan 2023, 22:37
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

All of which makes sense to me, but none of which...

All of which makes sense to me, but none of which determines - at least not in my mind - the substance of the VMC requirements applicable to NVFR operations at or below the higher of 3,000’ AMSL and...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
16th Jan 2023, 06:17
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

Who’s arguing otherwise? Call me a bit too...

Who’s arguing otherwise?

Call me a bit too pedantic, but how do you maintain at least 1,000’ AGL above obstacles on departure if there are no lights on features on that ground (and no moon). ...
Forum: The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
16th Jan 2023, 02:02
Replies: 253
Views: 38,515
Posted By Clinton McKenzie

I sent these questions to the CASA ‘Guidance...

I sent these questions to the CASA ‘Guidance Delivery Centre’ this morning:[/color]
Showing results 1 to 24 of 24


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.