Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

Collision Course

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd January 2003 | 14:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: New Forrest
Collision Course

What did the armchair critics of Press & TV think of the BBC programme last night.....before you answer, an AAIB inspector was advisor on the production!
Skitzoid is offline  
Old 22nd January 2003 | 16:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
I think the important thing to realise about the programme is that it was NOT designed to be an in-depth investigation of the actual accident but a demonstration of how sometimes-minor decisions can converge into a single point of consequence.
Konkordski is offline  
Old 22nd January 2003 | 18:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: Alba sor
Exclamation

I only saw the last 30mins but it was compelling. The bit about Prof Angus Wallace was very interesting, the fact that due to Kegworth he saved a womans life on that flight in '95.
Meeb is offline  
Old 22nd January 2003 | 20:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 1
From: Who can say?
Darn it - I missed it. Does anyone have a tape of it?
Captain Stable is offline  
Old 24th January 2003 | 12:42
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: London
Omissions: Wallace and the other casualty folk from all the local hospitals did a study of the injuries and made not just the recommendations concerning the new brace position, but suggestions on rear-facing seats. No mention made, either, that cabin crew with rear-facing seats were least injured.

No mention either of the new 16G seats being attached to a 9G floor, nor of those pax killed by heavy items hurtling out of the overhead bins (every single one of which detached).

Error: the commentary stated that the vibration stopped "by chance" after they throttled back the wrong engine. In fact it was the disengagement of the auto-throttle that stopped the virbration and falsely confirmed to the crew they had shut down the correct engine. If that is too complicated for viewing public there are better ways of expressing it than "by chance".

But hey, you can't have everything. Can't fault it as a human-interest story, though, which is what the film was primarily, and well-made it was too.
Frangible is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.