Wikiposts
Search
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

no loadsheet, no fly

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Sep 2002, 16:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: channel islands
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no loadsheet, no fly

here's a thought......you are on holiday somewhere and are taking an a/c transfer to your island, camp etc, say in a C-206. There appears to be no load and trim calcs done by the pilot so you politely ask to see the load sheet. He tells you he hasn't done one or something along those lines, but his experience tells him that having done this a thousand times before there will be no problem.
What do you do?????
gurnzee is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2002, 19:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The old bush method of checking trim in a 206. Hang about 8kg off the tail tie down eye, and if the tail hits the ground its out of trim. If not, its fine!
smallfry is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2002, 05:54
  #3 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
It is going to be determined by the local regulatory requirements, especially in respect to whether the aircraft is small or heavy, RPT or other operation, etc., as to whether a formal load sheet is required. So far as the trim is concerned, for a smaller aircraft it is quite appropriate to consider the use of load rule scheduling which removes the need for routine calculations.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2002, 15:54
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: channel islands
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as a pax, will your 'insurance' cover costs if there was a legal requirement to carry a loadsheet, and one wasn't, or could you sue their a### if you had an accident?
gurnzee is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2002, 22:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a general rule if you are involved in an accident then you will get paid, it is called Accident Insurance not 'Totally Blame Free Insurance'. Only if it could be proved that you had in some way wilfully contributed to the accident could you be penalized, as a passenger that would be highly unlikely. If the carrying company have acted improperly the insurance underwriters will sort it out with them.

As I said, this is as a general rule and local conditions may apply.
BlueEagle is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2002, 22:30
  #6 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Handmaiden
 
Join Date: Feb 1997
Location: Duit On Mon Dei
Posts: 4,672
Received 46 Likes on 24 Posts
When I used to fly C206's and C207's we had to fill out a load sheet but not a trim sheet. A load sheet doesn't have to be flash, just a very simple column with the relevant figures in it.
Experience will tell you if you have loaded the C206 badly. I just used to keep covering trim sheets just to prove that using "x" load distributed "y" in the cabin/luggage compartment = in trim.

So, not knowing exactly what was said, he/she may have done a load sheet but not a trim sheet.
redsnail is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2002, 11:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I used to calculate a standard load sheet.

As long as the load weight & positioning was within the parameters of the standard load then I was OK.

Did the same for performance using reasonable worst case criteria. Unless one or more criterion moved outside the worst case I had no need to recalculate.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2002, 12:34
  #8 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,232
Received 50 Likes on 26 Posts
How would you feel if, flying an identical load and an identical sector to one you've done hundreds of times before, a Pax you don't know from Adam starts sticking his nose into your planning?

You'd probably tell him it was all sorted out, and to sit down and let you get on with your job.

What was it he said exactly?

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2002, 17:59
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Weight And Balance

Unless you're putting several large rocks or bowling balls into the baggage compartment, a C206 is not likely to be out of the CG envelope. It's more about the potential of being overweight than about being out of trim! And when you're flying pax in a small single engine airplane you really don't need an abacus to figure your cabin payload. What are you gonna do...ask a female passenger how much she weighs? She wouldn't tell you the truth.
GlueBall is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.