Bird Strikes on the Increase
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montreal
Age: 92
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The number of bird strike incidents at Britain's airports has nearly doubled
A Shuttlebottom posted the above title in his story. Sure, "number of birdstrikes" can increase and makes one think the birds are taking over the skies !
Now, everyone knows that this is only one part of the total picture, which is the ratio per numbers of
activity in which bird strikes occurred. So, please report this in a rate per number of flights or hours flown, so that we can properly understand the impact (or lack thereof)
Now, everyone knows that this is only one part of the total picture, which is the ratio per numbers of
activity in which bird strikes occurred. So, please report this in a rate per number of flights or hours flown, so that we can properly understand the impact (or lack thereof)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Climate change, stupid
I expect that the IPCC will shortly be issuing a release to the effect that "this is just one further piece of incintrovertable evidence proving the dangers and effects of anthropomorphic climate dhange", or words to that effect.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Another Planet.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Climate change, stupid"
It might very well be climate change?
The financial climate, which means airports will do ANYTHING to maximise their profits, in keeping with the standard psychotic behaviour of corporations and those who run them, means that any attempt to operate a "long grass policy" is doomed by the requirement to harvest the hay on the airport at the optimum time to allow the connected farmer the best product.
The RAF reckoned that a long grass policy discouraged the presence of many of the "offending" bird species, taking care to ensure the lighting systems and electronic radiators were unaffected by such vegetation.
I can't see the modern airport managers allowing this practice to interfere with the hay income, which must feature along with the shopping franchises in the terminals, in helping the beancount to look better!
The financial climate, which means airports will do ANYTHING to maximise their profits, in keeping with the standard psychotic behaviour of corporations and those who run them, means that any attempt to operate a "long grass policy" is doomed by the requirement to harvest the hay on the airport at the optimum time to allow the connected farmer the best product.
The RAF reckoned that a long grass policy discouraged the presence of many of the "offending" bird species, taking care to ensure the lighting systems and electronic radiators were unaffected by such vegetation.
I can't see the modern airport managers allowing this practice to interfere with the hay income, which must feature along with the shopping franchises in the terminals, in helping the beancount to look better!
Last edited by BARKINGMAD; 27th Aug 2013 at 08:08.
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,574
Received 422 Likes
on
222 Posts
Thirty years ago my job involved flying at very low level in West Germany. Birdstrikes were commonplace occurrences. It was wasn't seen worthwhile sending remains for analysis because we would be doing it so often. For me, birdstrikes are now far less common.
