Wikiposts
Search
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

Object strike at FL 262

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Jun 2013, 15:53
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
would that sort of impact penetrated the windscreen do you think?
I doubt it. The nose cones break away long before the wind screen does.

For another poster

composite structures on aircraft don't break into small pieces on impact. They do give way and break along fracture lines and then may be finished off by the airstream or centrifugal forces in the case of engine nose spinners.

Whatever hit this one dented it but I don't see the typical crease and fracture at the bottom of a significant hit.

I'll allow that parts of a bird like bones may have left scuff marks directly in line with the flight path of the aircraft and not scattered.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2013, 17:08
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Where it is comfortable...
Age: 60
Posts: 911
Received 13 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by First.officer
Mystery solved?
Dont't think so, the cited source does not appear to be too reliable.

I've seen the traces of several bird strikes (including a large seagull that hit the side window of a 73' on takeoff, managed to squeeze it open about 2-3 milimetres, and then proceeded to enter the cockpit through that gap, flesh, beak, bones, feathers & all...). A bird strike leaves quite a bit of a mess... Also 8000 metres is very high, have heard of vultures getting up that high, but a bird of that size hitting at 500mph would do more than a dent. Based on info from more knowledgable posters on this thread, I'd vouch for a balloon till proven otherwise.

Last edited by andrasz; 6th Jun 2013 at 17:08.
andrasz is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2013, 17:59
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Well, I would not discount a birdstrike. I posted on another forum recently that I hit a fair sized bird over Northern Germany at night between cloud layers on the descent into CGN at 19,000 ft.

I am also sure that I have read of geese being up at 30,000 ft (without filing a flight plan).
JW411 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2013, 18:25
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the dark side of the moon
Posts: 976
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Indeed. UPS hit a goose on the windscreen at FL310 over Colorado Springs a few years back. It was in the dark of night - must have scared the stuffing out of that crew.

Last edited by J.O.; 6th Jun 2013 at 18:26.
J.O. is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2013, 20:27
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Several years ago saw a similar failure due to delamination of the radome over time.The weakened structure had imploded under the air loads.
New radome please
topdog1 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2013, 21:37
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Scotland
Age: 80
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I removed feathers jammed in a lap joint aft of the radome on an Iranair 727 that had a bird strike at 23000 feet over the Gulf at night - seemed to belong to some kind of raptor.
bcgallacher is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2013, 03:36
  #27 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The birds going up above 20.000 ft are not that many (i.e. Condors, Vultures, Canadian Geese ) all fairly big an heavy ( Vultures around 4-5 Kg , Geese 5-9 Kgs and condors up to 15 Kg ) .
These kind of weights at 900 Km/h hitting the ( plastic) radome would end up on the knees of the crew I think.
I would also normally leaves some blood traces.
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2013, 04:48
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The radome probably just collapsed due internal structural failure..
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2013, 06:46
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: On the equator
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blood stains are usually evident on the airframe after a bird strike ...??
training wheels is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2013, 06:53
  #30 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blood stains are usually evident on the airframe after a bird strike ...??
You bet.
just type " bird strike" on google images.
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2013, 07:33
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Amongst all the gore is this one:

Sutherland Shire Squadron - Photo Gallery - Bird Strike

Which bears some similarity, lacks gizzards and appears to be a confirmed bird strike.
worrab is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2013, 17:05
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
China has plenty of UAV's, the Guizhou Soar Eagle ceiling is 59,000 feet.

The service ceiling on a Global Hawk is 60,000 feet, and routinely fly at 45,000.

Last edited by FlightPathOBN; 7th Jun 2013 at 17:06.
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2013, 09:23
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In a Bar
Posts: 243
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
B Fraser,
I don't know about the weather balloons which you are used to, but the one I had an encounter with over southern China a few years back was MANY times the size of the one pictured!
Jn14:6 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2013, 11:28
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: .
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jn14:6: The balloons expand as they climb (due to the low atmospheric pressure). At typical aircraft cruising altitudes they will be 50-100% larger than at sea level.
Nemrytter is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2013, 16:07
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The typical National Weather Service radiosonde instrument looks like it would cause the damage...seems reasonable China would use something very similar..


Last edited by FlightPathOBN; 8th Jun 2013 at 16:08.
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2013, 07:26
  #36 (permalink)  
Tabs please !
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Biffins Bridge
Posts: 954
Received 371 Likes on 222 Posts
It was the type where the hydrogen obeys the laws P1V1/T1 = P2V2/T2. The balloons did leak a bit and hydrogen does behave slightly oddly but the equation is a good enough analogy to show what happens when P reduces by a lot and T reduces by a little (in terms of Kelvin).

If you added a bit too much gas then the balloon would burst at a lower altitude so you could bunk off home sooner. Not that I ever did such a thing
B Fraser is online now  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 10:36
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In a Bar
Posts: 243
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nemrytter:
Not just the balloon, but the VERY large object dangling beneath it!
Jn14:6 is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 17:47
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: BHX LXR ASW
Posts: 2,272
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
No no no you have it all wrong it's a UFO:

Did Chinese plane have mid-air crash with UFO? | The Sun |News
crewmeal is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 18:02
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: 03 ACE
Age: 73
Posts: 1,015
Received 33 Likes on 22 Posts
Currently of course, for once, The Sun is 100% correct
El Grifo is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2013, 19:33
  #40 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,142
Received 224 Likes on 66 Posts
Absolutely. It was an object, it was flying (after a fashion at least), and it's unidentified. Ergo UFO.
Herod is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.