Wikiposts
Search
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

A difference between TEM and SMS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Nov 2011, 07:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: International Space Station
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question A difference between TEM and SMS?

Hi people,

Trying to get my head around SMS and TEM. From an organizational point of view, what is the difference between the two?

My guess is that SMS (the system) is a 'toolbox' which consists of risk/hazard mitigation, documentation, and constant evaluation.

Where as TEM is a tool for simply highlighting the risks/issues?

Anyone got a simple answer?

help appreciated
MT
major_tom is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2011, 13:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
SMS is a conceptual management system which operators are encouraged (required) to use.
The toolbox notion is explained in para 7.2.1. of the ICAO Safety Management Manual

TEM is a less well defined safety concept (a personal safety management process), primarily for individuals and teams (crews) to combat everyday safety issues.
IMHO the academic concept has not been well translated into practical safety initiatives, and in many areas overlaps CRM and Human Factors training, and thus is somewhat distracting.
Defensive Flying for Pilots: An Introduction to Threat and Error Management.

SMS might be considered more strategic management whereas TEM is tactical, but aspects of each level of management are usually required by both operators and individuals according to circumstance.

Teaching and Assessing Single-Pilot Human Factors and Threat and Error Management.


Managing Human Error.

Safety is everyone’s responsibility -“Responsibility lies with those who could act but do not, it lies with those who could learn but do not and for those who evaluate it can add to their capacity to make interventions which might make all our lives the safer”. (Phillip Capper)
PEI_3721 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2011, 09:36
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: International Space Station
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Pei, I like your idea/concept of SMS being strategic with TEM more of a tactical approach.

SMS theory is something I find not many uni's seem to be tackling at the moment - hence making it a little vague when it becomes an actual topic.

awesome help
major_tom is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2011, 20:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: retirementland
Age: 79
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TEM is a less well defined safety concept
IMHO the academic concept has not been well translated into practical safety initiatives
I agree.

SMS theory is something I find not many uni's seem to be tackling at the moment
Try City University in London. They have very good lecturers
Shell Management is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2011, 22:53
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Lectures and theory are not as important as undertaking the processes of SMS and TEM.
Then, it’s all very well conducting an audit, but it’s what you do after that which is really important.
More often the important issues are not the threats and hazards which have been identified (you can always find these), it’s the way which your safety process is or is not working – go look at that.

Some modern views on the subject from Erik Hollnagel:-

Resilience Engineering and Proactive Safety Management.

Safety Culture, Safety Management, and Resilience Engineering.

How to be safe by looking at what goes right instead of what goes wrong.
PEI_3721 is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 10:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And then you get the company SOP (and yes, there is one well known operator that does this) that requires the captain to bring TEM to his first officer's attention by saying aloud just before take off (all for the CVR of course!).
"Threat and Error management Briefing..the threat is the water on the runway today. I shall manage the threat by using full thrust and being careful not to over-steer using the nosewheel steering...the next threat is a line of CB at 30 miles ahead. I shall manage that threat by tracking to the south of the CB. You will assist my management of the threat by setting the radar tilt to 10 degrees up on my request and using CRM techniques you will advise ATC of my intention. The last threat is the freezing level at 9000 ft and I shall manage that threat by calling for you to select engine anti-ice on as soon as the TAT falls below +10.
Any questions"?

"Yes my captain I have a question"

"Wot is it boy...is it a threat I have not seen?"

"No my captain - but is there any chance I can have a go at managing my own threats seeing as you are giving me the leg"?
Tee Emm is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 18:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Nice one TM. “… and what is the wet V1 sir …?!!!”
safetypee is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.