Derated / Assumed Thrust Departures
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NW
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guppy you live in a world of internet forums...where the ability to hide, the tempo, perfectly suits your style of banter...in an airport lounge...you can't run away...you would have to sit there and answer the question right in front of the line guys, other pilots...and using the Socratic method...I, you, and everyone else would quickly and positively come to the inevitable conclusion about your aviation knowledge.
This thread is about De Rated departures...your certainly welcome to take the bait and explain to everyone why you would put 200 passengers father down the runway in order to save some money on engine overhauls..
Come on Mr. Expert...explain the logic of this.
This thread is about De Rated departures...your certainly welcome to take the bait and explain to everyone why you would put 200 passengers father down the runway in order to save some money on engine overhauls..
Come on Mr. Expert...explain the logic of this.
It is not De Rated, it's derate. As in, an alternative thrust rating. Lots of good reasons--better runway performance thru reduced Vmcg, for one. But, you don't understand performance, are not willing to learn; I'll stop here and let you use SEARCH
GF
GF
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NW
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Galaxy..if I want to call it a de-rated thrust departure, assumed thrust departure, and reduced power departure, or a 'I am a robot who just doesn't want to lose his job departure'
It's all the same...now stop dancing around the subject, stop evading...bring all that aeronautical expertise and show me why these types of ops make sense to you guys.
It's all the same...now stop dancing around the subject, stop evading...bring all that aeronautical expertise and show me why these types of ops make sense to you guys.
Well, johns7022,SinglePilotCaptain, ssg, or whatever name you want to go by, do you understand the role Vmcg plays in take-off performance? There is a huge difference between derate and reduced power, I'd suggest doing some searching, first.
GF
GF
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NW
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I am still waiting.....everyone run off?...where are all the experts to discuss this topic?
Just dodging? Just parries? Calling the mods to get me kicked off?
Little girls.....
Just dodging? Just parries? Calling the mods to get me kicked off?
Little girls.....
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
G'day yar dill. You could start by reading the thread you started in your ssg guise.
http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/32732...offs-safe.html
Mods, I think you could close this one. Plowing an old paddock an all that.
http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/32732...offs-safe.html
Mods, I think you could close this one. Plowing an old paddock an all that.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NW
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No don't close the thread..Brian is going to elaborate on Assumed thrust departures...two days and he hasn't said anything...we are waiting Brian?
To much Fosters today?
To much Fosters today?
Johns7022
Do us all a favor and review the linked thread above...it pretty clearly shows everyone just how ignorant of basic performance and certification you are. I reviewed it, was reminded of a few things from experts and how supercilious you are.
GF
Do us all a favor and review the linked thread above...it pretty clearly shows everyone just how ignorant of basic performance and certification you are. I reviewed it, was reminded of a few things from experts and how supercilious you are.
GF
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Brian is going to elaborate on Assumed thrust departures
I'll just call you out on any of your crap that I know to be bull****e.
