Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning
Reload this Page >

correct procedure in case of an emergency water landing

Wikiposts
Search
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

correct procedure in case of an emergency water landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2009, 11:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: vienna
Age: 41
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
correct procedure in case of an emergency water landing

We all know about recently miricle on the Hudson river, where 57 years old flight captain Chesley Sullenberger sucesfully ditched boeing 320 into the Hudson river near Manhattan.
But I can't find the data about how he succeeded that hard manoeuvre and what is the correct procedure (by FAA) in case of emergency water landing.

I predict that captain (when he found out that he lost all the thrust), lowered the nose of a plane so he reached best glide speed (190 KIAS for A320), but what he did after that, how he landed on the water?

Did he add full flaps and slow the plane down to Vs0 speed (minimum flight speed in landing configuration) and than maintain normal landing attitude (5-7° nose up with level wings), until the plane touch down the water.

What about the fuel? Plane probably had some fuel, did captain dump the feul prior the ditching. This way plane will be lighter maning Vs0 speed will be lower + it will easier float on the water.

And how come that plane almost completly sinked, isn't fuselage water tight if it is air tight, front doors and emergency exits above the wings where above the water line. Could passangers wait in the plane, until rescue teams will come?
sticky_beaver is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2009, 16:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AEP
Age: 80
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ditching procedures

Ditching procedures vary.
As per type of airplane, as per airline policies and procedures.
If I read my procedure, it is only correct for my aircraft and my airline.
One thing to remember -
Any takeoff near water, you might be ditching 10 seconds after lift-off...
Crews are well aware and trained for that, cockpit or cabin crews.
And passengers should read safety diagrams first, rather than duty-free catalogs.
xxx
Today's Pprune topic is ditching immediately after takeoff.
Last week subject was aborted takeoff and evacuation with fire, Denver 737.
Then before, was BA 777 landing short at LHR with no power....
Knock on wood, there will be no other favorite topic for a few months.
Or just "how to become a pilot" and "who is hiring 250 hrs pilots"...?
xxx

Happy contrails
BelArgUSA is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2009, 20:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
With no engines powering the hydraulics, you cannot select any flaps. Only slats.. Even if he had flaps, he would have to maintain enough speed to keep the ram air turbine turning happily in order to pressurize the flightcontrols. So no slowing down!!

In the meantime, the FO would not have working screens, just to mention a few things. Unless they had the foresight to start the APU at the first hint of engine trouble.
PENKO is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2009, 20:45
  #4 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think I am believing what I am reading here - someone having a laugh?
BOAC is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2009, 07:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: cloud 9
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ask Sully and his crew - their correct procedure seemed to turn out alright.
point8six is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2009, 12:54
  #6 (permalink)  
IGh
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Castlegar
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dead-stick (engines-out) Apprch Config

From SB, re' loss of all engine Apprch Procedures:
"... can't find the data about ... manoeuvre and ... the correct procedure (by FAA) ... when he ... lost all the thrust ... best glide speed ... Did he add full flaps and slow ...?"

See the objection by SHK way back in 1992, in their CONCLUSION #17:

= = = = \/ = = = EXCERPT = = = \/ = = =

Statens haverikommission
SHK Board of Accident Investigation
Stockholm Sweden

Report C 1993:57
Case L-124/91
...
OY-KHO, Douglas DC-9-81 (MD-81)
Time of incident: 27-12-1991, 0851 hrs Swedish normal time
Place: Gottrora, AB County (pos 5946N 1808E)
After approx. 25 seconds flight the right engine started to surge. ... the engine stopped delivering thrust 51 seconds after the surges had started.

... 65 seconds the left engine also started to surge... this engine also lost thrust. This happened two seconds after the right engine had failed....

3 Conclusions ...

3.1 Findings ...
...
#17 The emergency/malfunction checklist ... did not include sufficient instructions regarding speed and flap position for approach and landing with ... with both engines unserviceable...

4 Recommendations

The Board of accident Investigation recommends …
[AAR pg 88] …

4 seek the addition to the emergency/malfunction checklist of instructions for emergency landing in the case of loss of thrust from both engines,
= = = end excerpt = = =
Does the A320 FCOM include those procedures????
IGh is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.