ACAS alert
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ACAS alert
Question.
If you have an RA to descend and you inform ATC with, 'ACAS descent' and then they tell you to continue the descent to FL X.
After clear of conflict, should you level off, climb back to initial FL or continue the descent to the cleared level?
Thanks.
If you have an RA to descend and you inform ATC with, 'ACAS descent' and then they tell you to continue the descent to FL X.
After clear of conflict, should you level off, climb back to initial FL or continue the descent to the cleared level?
Thanks.
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, once you've 'acas descent' the controller should not issue you with a revised clearance.
If they do, they either are acting contrary to procedure or your 'acas descent' call wasn't heard for some reason.
Technically you are supposed to return to your last cleared and acknowledged level once clear of conflict. Standard RT phraseology is to call "returning to [cleared level]" so in effect that prompts the controller to reissue the revised clearance if it is still considered suitable.
pb
If they do, they either are acting contrary to procedure or your 'acas descent' call wasn't heard for some reason.
Technically you are supposed to return to your last cleared and acknowledged level once clear of conflict. Standard RT phraseology is to call "returning to [cleared level]" so in effect that prompts the controller to reissue the revised clearance if it is still considered suitable.
pb
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just trying to remember how it goes.
If there is a conflict, there is a RA by means of the green area on the VSI telling you what rate of climb or descent is required, descent in this example.
What I cant remember is, once the conflict is over, does the green on the VSI just disappear, it doesnt give you info to return to your original level/altitude, so, if once the green has gone, the conflict is no longer, and during the manoeuvre a clearance was given to descend, then you could quite safely continue to the descend to the new cleared level/altitude?
I guess it is hypothetical as it has been said there should be no clearances given while involved in a RA.
If there is a conflict, there is a RA by means of the green area on the VSI telling you what rate of climb or descent is required, descent in this example.
What I cant remember is, once the conflict is over, does the green on the VSI just disappear, it doesnt give you info to return to your original level/altitude, so, if once the green has gone, the conflict is no longer, and during the manoeuvre a clearance was given to descend, then you could quite safely continue to the descend to the new cleared level/altitude?
I guess it is hypothetical as it has been said there should be no clearances given while involved in a RA.
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If there is a conflict, there is a RA by means of the green area on the VSI telling you what rate of climb or descent is required, descent in this example.
What I cant remember is, once the conflict is over, does the green on the VSI just disappear, it doesnt give you info to return to your original level/altitude,
Correct, there is no guidance from TCAS back to your original flight path. However your flight director will do, assuming its still on (some companies turn it off) and assuming its still programmed correctly.
so, if once the green has gone, the conflict is no longer, and during the manoeuvre a clearance was given to descend, then you could quite safely continue to the descend to the new cleared level/altitude?
pb
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Scandiland
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My thoughts are that if ATC manouvered you into that situation, it's some kind of evidence that the controller is not in control over the situation. Accepting a clearance during the actual event I feel is a good foundation for a latent error. Let the clear of conflict sound and then ask what they want you to do. That would be my line of action. But Capt pitbull said it first and in a better way...
/LnS
/LnS
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My thoughts are that if ATC manouvered you into that situation, it's some kind of evidence that the controller is not in control over the situation
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Scandiland
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And thus per definition the controller is no longer in control over the situation. It might not be his fault, I'll give you that, but he/she is no longer the one running the show...