Wikiposts
Search
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

Milan, and lessons learnt?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st May 2004, 17:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: flightdeck/earlyhours commute
Posts: 199
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Milan, and lessons learnt?

I was In milan linate a few days ago. First time.

Interesting thing.

We were given a taxi clearance to the holding point of the active runway. The use of non-standard phrases by ATC meant that this clearance could have been interpreted as a line up clearance to the same runway.
An a/c was on approximately 2 mile final on reaching the holding point.

Weather was nice though!
So we could see what was happening!!

Not sure that issuing prison sentences (as per last report on milan incident) is going to help.

Any thoughts?
Shiny side down is offline  
Old 2nd May 2004, 21:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many factors contributed to the linate accident. ATC instructions at any airport can often be mis-interpreted whether or not standard phraseology is used so my thoughts are:

- always be vigilant
- if you are uncertain about the ATC instruction received then question it.
- always read back ATC instructions, particularly when a runway line up or crossing is involved.

Safety is paramount.
Musket90 is offline  
Old 3rd May 2004, 16:13
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Who can say?
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed. In questioning clearances, instructions etc., I would also strongly advise caution against "confirmation bias" as well.

In other words, instead of asking "Confirm ABC123 cleared FL150?", ask "Say again our cleared flight level? ABC123".

Especially when in a viatal stage of flight, or when your action will be difficult to reverse (e.g. entering the runway), if either pilot (or FE) is in any doubt, always check, and check again with ATC until both (or all) of you are in no doubt as to what it is they want or have cleared you to do.
Captain Stable is offline  
Old 3rd May 2004, 16:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Mahlangeni
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with Captain Stable and Muskat90. Rather pose OPEN questions than closed questions.

But as the Linate accident shows, sometimes one is vigilant (SAS) but the other guys are maybe not. It is all well to have situational awareness and not to fall prey to confirmation bias, only to have somebody do the wrong thing while you have the feeling that they are doing the right thing, but cannot actually see that they are doing the right thing, i.e. when in LOW VIS conditions.

We should all be more stricter with ourselves and always ask ourselves the "What if..." question.

A couple of good keywords:

Preparation
Teamwork
Vigilance
Trust
square leg is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.