Wikiposts
Search
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

pilots victimised !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Dec 2003, 13:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: shangri-la NOMORE
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pilots victimised !

Just a few questions. Would appreciate info. on the following.

1. Have you ever been victimised by your superiors, management people or local aviation authorities ? How did you handle it ?

2. Following an incident which the crews handle well. If the crew are victimised :by putting off the flights, letting the crew license get expired, preventing the crew from maintaining PPC and Recurrency not to mention deliberately causing the crew great mental stress, in the pretext of conducting investigation (which is supposed to last 5 days but is still going on for 60 days and never seem to be coming to an end) by management and some corrupt officials of local aviation authority, is there anyway the crew could ask for help from internatioinal aviation body ? like pilots associations or may be ICAO ? have any one experienced such thing and how did you handle ?

3. I am talking about a country whose aviation safety record is very bad due to corruption and other irregularities.

thanks for your answers !

cheers,

himalaya
himalaya is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2003, 11:32
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: shangri-la NOMORE
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even after 79 views there is not a single reply. It surprises me. Does this mean no one has been victimized ?
himalaya is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2003, 16:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Who can say?
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, himalaya, it doesn't.

However, the way in which you put the question rather inhibits answering. It sounds as if your question is rhetorical.

It could also mean that people have been victimised and don't want to talk about it.

I know of one case in which a company flight safety officer was considered by the higher-ups as being too "proactive" in his approach, and wanting changes made to the systems, to rostering, to SOPs. His proposals would, undoubtedly, have led to improved safety. However, the company decided to try to shut him up, and all of a sudden, it was decided that his performance on his last Base Check had not been good enough, and he was recommended for further training at short notice. This training, strangely enough, was scheduled for a time when the company was due to be OSAPped by the CAA, so there would be inspectors around the offices.

There are numerous other cases that I have heard of. How each individual handles it is up to him/her - after all, all individuals are different, they are dealing with different situations in different countries, in different regulatory climates. There is no single solution.
Captain Stable is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.