Monarch
 

Monarch :cool:
To all those people thinking of joining Monarch please let me tell you it is not the same great company it used to be. There are a whole lot of things that have changed and perhaps some of those need to be high lighted here. Firstly the management has a bean counter at the head, who at this times is heading for a head to head with the pilots. Most pilots are very hissed off at not getting any pay rise over the last two years. A laughable increase was given recently, ha! while most have knuckled down and worked very hard, and still are, management have seen it fit to drive them further down, the WMD they are using is still the old , 9/11 and our profit margins are down, etc. Yet we are working harder, flying more, the planes are full. Does that sound familiar? Because its a private company you can not see the company reports, so how do we ever know how the company is doing? I don't recall any company ever saying its having a good year, including monarch!
The final salary company pension scheme is not now available for now entrants and the top hat scheme which meant your pension grew by 11% each year after 55 is now reduced to 7%. It was a reason why pilots stayed on, but now a lot of guys are thinking otherwise. certainly there is no reason for FO's to give any loyality by staying, especially as commands are over 8 years off.
The 757 crews are equally hissed off as they seem to be flying 3 tel aviv trips every week on level two FTL variation. incidently why does the CAA allow this to become a normal way of rostering flights. Also I hear that lots of 757 pilots who volunteered for the Airbus fleet this year have missed out because someone has been offering out of seniority postings onto the fleet.
There are also lots of positionnings after flights and its not unusual to complete a long night duty followed by hanging out in an airport lounge for a few hours before flying or taxing back just so the company saves a hotel room and some allowances.
Flight sector pay does not excist and call out pay on days off, though just increased is still way below national average. At the moment the company seems keen on using brand new CTC pilots on loan from a easy airline, these guys only cost allowances and no permanant contact, its not a way of protecting jobs or conditions for anyone. No one thinks what will happen on a dark and dirty night somewhere in the greek islands when the chips are down?
So if you are thinking of joinning, remember that its the guys who work there who made it a great company, the feeling is not so good at the moment, the coming months may produce a mass exodus, a work to rule may shortly follow. Maybe someone at the top may realise loyalty and goodwill deserve to be rewarded, but once lost, they can not be retrieved easly. However if all these issues resolve there selves, get in fast! ::O

Whoa there,

Please give us examples of these allowances which are well under the market rate. As one who is certainly targeting Monarch, and already a victim of terms and conditions which I think would even make you think you were working for an arche angel, I would certainly like the info to avoid the possibility of jumping from th frying pan into the fire.
:{

tonyflaire

I'm not a Monarch pilot, but up until recently have always thought of them as a happy company.

Your post describes what is now a general trend throughout the UK airline industry, based what I hear from friends, colleagues and on PPRuNe. It's sad to hear that Monarch are falling into the abyss. IMHO, generating unhappiness and resentment will eventually be counter-productive, even destructive.

A big thanks for a very open, forthright post ; most of the pilots in my outfit are too apathetic, scared of their own shadows and restricted by their terms of employment to put their true feelings into print. (observers please note)

:ok:

<<3 tel aviv trips every week on level two FTL variation>>
Could you post the planned roster for this trip, just to let us get an idea, and point out what the "level 2 FTL variation" implies i.e. what normal scheme allows, and what extra they get by doing this?

TIA
NoD

Chapter and verse from our company Ops manual:
What tonyflaire purports w.r.t 'The 757 crews are equally hissed off as they seem to be flying 3 tel aviv trips every week on level two FTL variation' is not possible under L2V - being limited by section g) for pilots (above), i.e. no more than 3 L2V's are permitted in any 28 day period.

Nb. I do not work for Monarch and maybe their L2V is different ( though somehow I doubt it )

Can't you get the accounts through Companies House? I think it costs a small fee however or find an accountant/mate that has access to it on the web (chargeable service)

Sagey

tonyflaire

The morale as you know has been better however which UK airline over the last couple of years has not had a hard time? I will offer my opinion on the points you raised.

1 Pay rise: we have just had 1% which we were promised from last year this years rise is having its final negotiations in september.

2 How many airlines offer new entrants a final salary scheme now? even BA have stopped theirs. The company in order to keep the scheme for the current pilots is putting in approx 6% more of our basic salary while we are having to contribute 2%.
The top hat scheme will vary over the years, yes it has just gone down however it will probably go up again in the future.

3 Day off payment i agree is not great £250 for f/o £350 for capt however you do not have to work a day if you do not want to and two years ago we did not have any payment at all.

4 I cannot imagine any crews doing 3 TLV a week it is not legal or did you mean there are 3 TLV flights a week on the 757

5 positioning after night duties i have noticed no difference, in EDI this summer they are giving us 12 hours off after a night duty prior to airlining home which twe never used to get.

6 Sector pay is not popular with the pilots however BALPA are looking into it at the moment

7 The CTC pilots by all accounts are very good.

8 Very few pilots leave there have been less that 5 this year.

I still think MON is probably the best airline in the UK however as you say we have an accountant at the controls who is keen to cut costs but we have to give him the benefit of the doubt( at the moment) as the last 2 years have not been easy.

Sagey...

Getting the Accounts through CH is possible... However, they are likely to be pretty meaningless. It is very easy to "massage" the accounts, and most largish companies operate as a network of Ltd. companies, and trying to unravel this lot is very difficult.

It is for this reason that Virgin's "Profit" and "Loss" declarations need to be watched carefully. "Virgin Atlantic" is one limited company of a network of 50+ largely owned and run by RB. A lot of the other companies are effectively subsidiaries, and only trade with VA. So if RB wishes to show a loss (e.g. "cos of big bad BA"), then a subsidiary charges excessive amounts for their services. Result, RB has same amount of money, but VA shows a loss (and some subsidiary you've never heard of does very well, but nobody notices). vv this year when "big bad BA" made a loss, so lets show how well VA is doing = declare a profit!

This may have been restricted somewhat now with SA involved, but this will be due to the terms they agreed - not due to reporting requirements etc.

BMI is (was?) rumoured to do the same - large "handling charges" applied in the CI = money shifting offshore. I have to say this is only a rumour - I do not know if BMI fly (or flew) to the CI - but the principle is there.

CH reporting requirements are designed to prevent fraud, and offer some transparency. However, they are not designed to see the true profit and loss state of a company, hence why the IR reporting requirments are different (effectively requiring the network of companies to report as one).

plc requirements are much stricter, since they are designed to show potential and current public investors what's really happening...

Given the rumours of who really owns Monarch, there's no doubt a large offshore element involved, and I doubt you'd ever get a true reflection...

NoD

NigelOnDraft

SQ have been on board for a few years now and if VS did that in the passed (I'm not saying the did'nt), SQ would not allow them to do it now. The audit committee is SQ WMD for VS.

If VS state they made a profit I think they did, VS seem to be run better and better these days and rememeber Branson is the figure head and the Board make the big decisions.

Yes, things at Monarch may be better in some ways than at some smaller outfits and yes, you can always find another company where things are worse. However, we used to be the best paid charter airline. More recently, we at least aspired to keep up with BY. We were always a happy company. Now moral is at an all time low. Most pilots are ready for a "work to rule".

Welcome to the world of 21st century Aviation!

Skyman...

Thanks for that - much as I thought (and did hint!)... I was really trying to point out how weak CH are as a source of good info on a company. As you point out - it's SQ who enforce the legitimacy of VS accounts now - not CH (or RB!)

I only knew (roughly) what went on when I was at VS, and that's well before SQ came along...

ATB
NoD

Only us make that famous 21st century aviation. But we're too shy to come out with even the slightest move, apart from barking on Pprune.

We are digging our own graves.

firstly thanks to everyone for their inputs and comments and can i clarify a few points..
with regards to the 757 tel aviv operation, i actually meant the fleet operates 3 night tel avivs weekly on level 2 using heavy crews. these crews rest in the cabin with those lovely passengers, i must ask if any company managenemt pilot has ever operate one of these.
With regard positioning after flights, please check again to see how many times crews are givan hotac after long night flights. YOU WILL FIND MOST CREWS ARE ROSTERED TO POSITION BACK. true the company will provide a hotel if one pushes for it but only if you are prepared to accept no extra allowances! BY and even my travel offer their crews hotac after night flights.
True we never had 350/250 pounds for working a day off, but the rate is still below BY ( almost double ) and virgin. WE were also never so short of crews before. The poor crewing staff not only get grief from pilots but also by their managers, its a thankless task when you don't have the tools.
Quite rightly you say only about 5 pilots have left this year , believe me there are many who are thinking of going. Just watch this space. Of course a lot depends on this years pay negotiations and conditions.
The CTC chaps are mostly good but they lack experience and when the level in the right seat is constanly low, it could prove expensive one day. Of course it makes the CEO's books look very good if he is only paying them / CTC half the salary, after all that is the bottom line.
ps. iam working harder then i have ever done.
pps. Its still a great company, its the guys working here who make it that, it would be sad to see it go the way of others.
good points, you can carry how much fuel you like aand if you make a decision in good faith the company will stick by you

Please take your whinges to the Monarch forum, many would like to discuss, but won't on the open forum.

EGGW

On the contrary EGGW, Tony's post isn't whinging or ranting, it's merely a factual account from his perspective. ALL of us in this business in the UK wish that things were better. The fact is that it's bad for most UK operators this year, so perhaps we can get a little strength from knowing that we are all in the same boat and hope that we all have a brighter 2004. If not, it seems the exodus to Middle East may continue.

Thanks for the post Tony, let's hope we weather the storm :ok:

Of course he's whinging, like most pilots he thinks the airline exits for his benefit and career. Why instead of putting this stuff on a public forum anonymously doesn't he go and see his managers? If you think that Monarch will see a mass exodus look around mate you don't know your born. Pilot shortage, dream on, they are two a penny and when out of work what are they qualified to do? Sourcing the company accounts is a joke most wouldn’t know if they were holding them upside down.

carruthers!

Good answer, couldn't agree more.

Carruthers, please don't comment until you have at least a rough idea what you are talking about!

Carruthers,
Please don't assume that we have only been educated to 'cleaning staff' level such as your goodself! A fair percentage of us have degrees in relatively academic subjects such as aeronautical engineering, chemical engineering, quantity surveying etc. So trying to make sense of a balance sheet doesn't really pose a great problem. As for being qualified to do anything else, a number of us run projects outside of flying ranging from property management to a lawnmower repair business.
We are all exremely concerned about the wellfare of the company and our pay and conditions. After 9/11 we agreed to a pay freeze in return for some form of redress at a later stage. Now we have reached that later stage and things have gone rather quiet!

But you don't have to be educated beyond 'cleaning staff' level, some may be, but a scan of these forums shows that most aren't. You all demand respect as professionals, what other profession posts publicly in this manner?

"what other profession posts publicly in this manner?"

Good point. Bye bye Carruthers.

Quantity surveying? Guess that Groundstar's field of excellence (??) then!! LOL

I'd suggest that we ignore Carruthers who is either unaware that much of the comment on this website is posted by people who are not professional flight crew or is himself one of those to whom the red warning at the bottom of this page refers.
I wonder if he is sufficiently educated or well read to be aware of one of the more famous literary sources from which his/her nom-de-web is derived.

Far From The Madding Crowd

Nope! but very apposite for parts of our website. ;)

If Hardy is to heavy going try Conan Doyle.

He is indeed!
How about Childers?

Indeed 'The Riddle of the Sands' rather a common name! Biggles is favourite here of course, except for lawn mower manuals.

Groundstar, I think you will find that most aeronautical engineering graduates would consider their degree more than ‘relatively’ academic! But the point is that no level of academic achievement is necessary to become a pilot. Cramming for a few multi choice questions from the CAA demands little but a spot of application, indeed many of our colleagues failed to achieve A level standard even current A level. You may also find that engineers, surveyors and lawn mower mechanics are least qualified to understand a balance sheet.

So tell us, Carruthers, why do you hate pilots?

Like children in a playground if you criticise us you hate us. Read the postings, you know better than the managers, ‘bean stealers’, bosses and everyone else, but you never have to put your money where your mouth is. All in all you are better paid with less hassle and responsibility than any other worker, which is simply what you are. You whinge, bitch and moan but the writing is on the wall, you have been sussed. It is the low cost carriers that have shown that you can be hired by the hour, are not a rare and exclusive profession and are available in abundance. It is ludicrous to suggest that the terms and conditions at Monarch are not extremely good, they will not be seen in future companies enjoy it while you can.

Carruthers....wouldn't be a suit by any chance, would you?
 

Of course we've been sussed, it's 2003 and everybody's been sussed. There isn't a profession left that 's not under pressure for more work and less pay with T's and C's heading south. Doesn't hide the fact though that running these airlines are a bunch of empty suits who haven't really been doing an exemplary job of late, fact is, most of the decision making would have been equally effective if made using the dart/dart board principle.
Wasn't aware that the suits were putting their own money where their mouth's were, thought they were losing other peoples cash while collecting an over generous salary for a job poorly done prior to bailing out on golden parachutes. Silly me, live and learn I suppose.
Metaphorically speaking, pilots rarely end up in a smoking hole but the suits seem to crash with monotonous regularity. Come on suits; sit up straight, pull your socks up, put the thinking caps on and give us pilot types nothing to whinge, bitch and moan about. Asking too much from the suits isn't it? Bit like expecting a leopard to change its spots.

From this thread one would deduce that pilots are generally regarded as professional whingers & suits as nitpicking beancounters, but please wake up - both groups are needed to run an airline. If this truth was accepted, then both groups could work towards a common goal, but suspect that views are too entrenched for this to happen.

Unfortunately I don't think that QAR ASR and XL5 are non pilot 'flamers'. Such arrogance and stupidity are typical of the trade.

OK, Carruthers, you imply that you don't hate pilots, but why are you spending your time writing this stuff? What do you do for a living?

Carruthers -

Why so poisonous?

Get turned down for a job with spotty m?

No "hangar floor sweepers" thread on this forum for you?

GET A BL**DY LIFE MAN!

Carruthers is just a common or garden Troll, just out to cause trouble. :*

Remember trolls hate silence!!!

EGGW

Speaking as an ex-suit (in another industry), I think it must be difficult to manage pilots.
They have massive responsibility whilst flying, but little at other times. They are paid as well as most of the suits, often better. Due to crewing restrictions they have the time to 'network' and whinge. Unusually for highly-paid staff they are (in some airlines) unionised. Their skills can not be replaced, and are central to the organisation. In short, they are educated professionals doing the kind of job that in many other industries would be blue-collar (because flying is high-tech).
Any comments?

PS not all suits are CEOs earning millions

LGS6753

Your comments on the whole are correct, with 100's of people seated behind you it is a massive responsibility and they are highly trained and worth the money they are paid. You are also right they are educated (I would add highly) professionals.

But when you put more than one in a room together, all you hear is how much better they can run the compnay and what a hard life they have and what is the best pension scheme on the market etc etc etc. But I think that's just human nature, we all feel we can do better than others.

I must point out I am not a pilot, never wished to be one and have no need to be one.


But they do deserve our respect for what they do and how they do it.

For those in Monarch complaining about declining terms and conditions and lack of pay rises. I would say that you should recognise that this is a recession, and most of us are lucky to even retain our jobs. If you need convincing then ask those in Buzz, Debonair, Sabena, Swissair,etc . All pilots in all the airlines are working harder than previously. The CAA website gives the following profit/(loss) before tax for the tax year ending 2002.

Monarch £300,000

Last year will have been worse (ie a sizeable loss), and the coming year worse still.

For comparison:

BA loss ( £187,000,000)
Thomas Cook loss ( £29,000,000)
Brit Mid loss ( £2,200,000)
FlyBE loss ( £16,900,000)
Virgin loss ( £14,500,000)

Britannia profit £63,300,000
Easyjet profit £40,100,000
Go profit £13,900,000
GB profit £12,900,000