PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   China's C919 maiden commercial flight (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/652954-chinas-c919-maiden-commercial-flight.html)

artee 28th May 2023 11:26

China's C919 maiden commercial flight
 
China’s first domestically produced passenger jet makes maiden commercial flight

"China’s first domestically produced passenger jet took off on its maiden commercial flight on Sunday, a milestone event in the nation’s decades-long effort to compete with western rivals in the air.

Beijing hopes the C919 commercial jetliner will challenge foreign models like the Boeing 737 MAX and the Airbus A320, though many of its parts are sourced from abroad.

Its first homegrown jetliner with mass commercial potential would also cut the country’s reliance on foreign technology as ties with the West deteriorate..."

I can't say I'll be rushing to be one of the first passengers.

Capt Fathom 28th May 2023 11:45


Originally Posted by artee (Post 11441884)

I can't say I'll be rushing to be one of the first passengers

Any particular reason why not?

artee 28th May 2023 11:50


Originally Posted by Capt Fathom (Post 11441896)
Any particular reason why not?

I'd like to see an established safety record first.

Capt Fathom 28th May 2023 11:55


Originally Posted by artee (Post 11441897)
I'd like to see an established safety record first.

Define an established safety record.

artee 28th May 2023 12:08


Originally Posted by Capt Fathom (Post 11441899)
Define an established safety record.

I'm not being scientific about this, I'd just rather not fly on one until they have a track record. Unreasonable, possibly.

DaveReidUK 28th May 2023 12:13

A tad over 6 years since the C919's maiden flight, and almost 6 months since the first delivery to the launch customer, would suggest that all hasn't gone terribly well in the meantime

Superpilot 28th May 2023 12:31

We are going to poke fun at the Chinese venture into aerospace (naturally) but one thing you need to know about Chinese culture is that they don't like failure, as to fail means to lose face. And so their attitude to engineering right now will be way more robust than Boeing's over the last decade.

Less Hair 28th May 2023 12:58

Quite a progress compared to the recent ARJ21 but I am not sure if they could do a CR929 widebody alone? Let's wait for their first export customers.

Pain in the R's 28th May 2023 13:28

It would be a brave western airline to order this aircraft. With the Chinese government continuing to make threats against Taiwan orders might never be delivered.

DaveReidUK 28th May 2023 13:42


Originally Posted by Superpilot (Post 11441916)
We are going to poke fun at the Chinese venture into aerospace (naturally) but one thing you need to know about Chinese culture is that they don't like failure, as to fail means to lose face. And so their attitude to engineering right now will be way more robust than Boeing's over the last decade.

I'm not casting any aspersions on Chinese engineering But, at the end of the day, it's not good engineering that sells airliners, but many other factors.

averow 28th May 2023 14:48

I can see it now" "Please hold for the next available airliner salesperson..."

YRP 28th May 2023 16:31


Originally Posted by DaveReidUK (Post 11441913)
A tad over 6 years since the C919's maiden flight, and almost 6 months since the first delivery to the launch customer, would suggest that all hasn't gone terribly well in the meantime

I don't know if that is the correct interpretation. It might be but it might not. Lots of possibilities: 1. they took the time to get it right, 2. reduced investment / team size, 3. inexperienced team that was learning as they went, 4. difficulties, as you said. And probably a few others.

From my experience in engineering development (electronics / high tech), getting out on schedule / fast can be a good or bad thing, often means immature management: gotta get out fast, worry about problems later, optimistic rather than careful. Design verification can be done _properly_ or going through the motions. Eg the testing on the Max.

I respect a team that takes the time rather than rushes. (If that was the case).

Not meaning to be critical of your comment, just been in this type of situation a lot.

Ben_S 28th May 2023 16:43


Originally Posted by DaveReidUK (Post 11441913)
A tad over 6 years since the C919's maiden flight, and almost 6 months since the first delivery to the launch customer, would suggest that all hasn't gone terribly well in the meantime

Doesn't seem terrible given similar timescales are likely for sticking a new wing and engines on the 777...

Asturias56 28th May 2023 16:55

or converting the 767 to a tanker...................

DaveReidUK 28th May 2023 17:15



Even after allowing for the US bias, still a pretty realistic assessment of China's troubled commercial aircraft manufacturing industry, and COMAC in particular.

GlobalNav 28th May 2023 18:50


Originally Posted by Capt Fathom (Post 11441896)
Any particular reason why not?

The Chinese did everything they could to avoid full compliance with certification standards, pencil-whipping wherever possible.
The FAA gave up trying to help them. Their heart wasn’t in it, only their pocketbook.

hans brinker 28th May 2023 21:44


Originally Posted by Capt Fathom (Post 11441896)
Any particular reason why not?

I think I can see where you are coming from. I did a lot of home improvement, and every bit of the parts I used were miC. All certified safe and legal. But a casual search on YouTube for escalator/elevator deaths will show a lot of videos from china.

First_Principal 28th May 2023 21:44


Originally Posted by DaveReidUK (Post 11441941)
I'm not casting any aspersions on Chinese engineering But, at the end of the day, it's not good engineering that sells airliners, but many other factors.

Tex Johnston would have you believe it's tipping people upside down in a machine that sells them...

FP.

Australopithecus 28th May 2023 22:11

Interesting situation that China finds itself in. A natural customer would be Russia after the war, but sanctions on engines and avionics are likely to be long-lasting. China itself cannot rattle sabres across the Taiwan strait for the same reasons.

While I personally eschew Chinese products where I have an option I don’t doubt their engineering prowess per se.

His dudeness 29th May 2023 07:45


And so their attitude to engineering right now will be way more robust than Boeing's over the last decade.
Which is a very, very low bar set.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:20.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.