China's C919 maiden commercial flight
China’s first domestically produced passenger jet makes maiden commercial flight
"China’s first domestically produced passenger jet took off on its maiden commercial flight on Sunday, a milestone event in the nation’s decades-long effort to compete with western rivals in the air. Beijing hopes the C919 commercial jetliner will challenge foreign models like the Boeing 737 MAX and the Airbus A320, though many of its parts are sourced from abroad. Its first homegrown jetliner with mass commercial potential would also cut the country’s reliance on foreign technology as ties with the West deteriorate..." I can't say I'll be rushing to be one of the first passengers. |
Originally Posted by artee
(Post 11441884)
I can't say I'll be rushing to be one of the first passengers |
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
(Post 11441896)
Any particular reason why not?
|
Originally Posted by artee
(Post 11441897)
I'd like to see an established safety record first.
|
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
(Post 11441899)
Define an established safety record.
|
A tad over 6 years since the C919's maiden flight, and almost 6 months since the first delivery to the launch customer, would suggest that all hasn't gone terribly well in the meantime
|
We are going to poke fun at the Chinese venture into aerospace (naturally) but one thing you need to know about Chinese culture is that they don't like failure, as to fail means to lose face. And so their attitude to engineering right now will be way more robust than Boeing's over the last decade.
|
Quite a progress compared to the recent ARJ21 but I am not sure if they could do a CR929 widebody alone? Let's wait for their first export customers.
|
It would be a brave western airline to order this aircraft. With the Chinese government continuing to make threats against Taiwan orders might never be delivered.
|
Originally Posted by Superpilot
(Post 11441916)
We are going to poke fun at the Chinese venture into aerospace (naturally) but one thing you need to know about Chinese culture is that they don't like failure, as to fail means to lose face. And so their attitude to engineering right now will be way more robust than Boeing's over the last decade.
|
I can see it now" "Please hold for the next available airliner salesperson..."
|
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
(Post 11441913)
A tad over 6 years since the C919's maiden flight, and almost 6 months since the first delivery to the launch customer, would suggest that all hasn't gone terribly well in the meantime
From my experience in engineering development (electronics / high tech), getting out on schedule / fast can be a good or bad thing, often means immature management: gotta get out fast, worry about problems later, optimistic rather than careful. Design verification can be done _properly_ or going through the motions. Eg the testing on the Max. I respect a team that takes the time rather than rushes. (If that was the case). Not meaning to be critical of your comment, just been in this type of situation a lot. |
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
(Post 11441913)
A tad over 6 years since the C919's maiden flight, and almost 6 months since the first delivery to the launch customer, would suggest that all hasn't gone terribly well in the meantime
|
or converting the 767 to a tanker...................
|
Even after allowing for the US bias, still a pretty realistic assessment of China's troubled commercial aircraft manufacturing industry, and COMAC in particular. |
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
(Post 11441896)
Any particular reason why not?
The FAA gave up trying to help them. Their heart wasn’t in it, only their pocketbook. |
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
(Post 11441896)
Any particular reason why not?
|
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
(Post 11441941)
I'm not casting any aspersions on Chinese engineering But, at the end of the day, it's not good engineering that sells airliners, but many other factors.
FP. |
Interesting situation that China finds itself in. A natural customer would be Russia after the war, but sanctions on engines and avionics are likely to be long-lasting. China itself cannot rattle sabres across the Taiwan strait for the same reasons.
While I personally eschew Chinese products where I have an option I don’t doubt their engineering prowess per se. |
And so their attitude to engineering right now will be way more robust than Boeing's over the last decade. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:20. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.