PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   Convair 440 crash on approach to Toledo-Express airport (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/625423-convair-440-crash-approach-toledo-express-airport.html)

Airmotive 12th Sep 2019 10:40

In the late 90s I worked the overnight shift on the ramp in Norfolk, VA (ORF), home of Ford’s F-150 production line. Ford was continuously working out the bugs of just-in-time inventory control, and so it was rare for an evening to pass without some classic (if not antique) cargo plane to pull up unannounced with a load of parts. No expense was spared to keep the production line running. The most memorable was a DC-8...taxied in, the pilot opened his cockpit window and dropped a paper grocery bag down to the ramp. I never did learn what was in the bag. It weighed maybe five pounds. Whatever it was, it warranted a DC-8 flight at 2AM.

Surlybonds 12th Sep 2019 12:34


Originally Posted by Airmotive (Post 10568158)
The most memorable was a DC-8...taxied in, the pilot opened his cockpit window and dropped a paper grocery bag down to the ramp. I never did learn what was in the bag.

Emergency donut order? :rolleyes:

Spooky 2 12th Sep 2019 14:00


Originally Posted by srjumbo747 (Post 10567954)
Condolences to all concerned.
Is it normal in the US to have pilots over 65 to fly commercially together?

I don't believe there are any age restrictions under Part 125 as long as it remains domestic. This reminds me of a Flying Tigers L1049 accident at KBUR back around 1962.

MarkerInbound 12th Sep 2019 14:47


Originally Posted by srjumbo747 (Post 10567954)
Condolences to all concerned.
Is it normal in the US to have pilots over 65 to fly commercially together?

You would have to define normal. Parts 91k, 125 and 135 do not have any age restrictions. But of the ~283 thousand active commercial and ATP pilots in the US there were 46,511 older than 65 the beginning of this year or about 16 percent. So over all.

Old Boeing Driver 12th Sep 2019 17:48

Condolences to the families and may the pilots RIP. In looking at their certificates, I wonder if they were ex Air America or Continental Air Services guys.

Raffles S.A. 12th Sep 2019 17:51

From the above pictures the direction of the crash appears to have been roughly in the direction of the arrow, which would make it a very steep turn onto final from that position. The flightaware track shows they made a left hand downwind pattern for the runway.

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....f7f775fbc0.png

Raffles S.A. 27th Sep 2019 12:01

NTSB preliminary reort. No indication as to what may have happened.

https://app.ntsb.gov/pdfgenerator/Re...relim&IType=MA

Lord Farringdon 28th Sep 2019 09:58

A sad event. Condolences to all the families concerned. N24DR in better times.

(Image attributed to Flightaware.)
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....00c04cd27b.jpg

XB70_Valkyrie 28th Sep 2019 14:46

A not-helpful statement in the media:

"“I’m surprised it does not have a black box. Obviously, the black box is proved to be an extremely useful tool in aviation investigations and I don’t know if this plane was required to have a black box or not,” said James Hall, a former NTSB board chairman and current managing partner of Hall & Associates in Washington."

https://www.toledoblade.com/local/po...es/20190912111

I'll throw out some possibilities: load/CG shift or PIC medical event on final.

A Squared 29th Sep 2019 05:45


Originally Posted by MarkerInbound (Post 10567910)


Under 121 or 125 they would have to have a basic 11 channel FDR. There is no requirement for a CVR. Given the ambient background noise a CVR wouldn’t pick up much that’s not on the ATC tapes.


FDR's are not required for recip aircraft, even under Part 121.


A Squared 29th Sep 2019 05:47


Originally Posted by MarkerInbound (Post 10567913)
Interesting that both of them have, besides the recip Convair type, DC-3 types, CW-46 types and YS-11 types. Guessing they had worked together for many years.

Not necessarily, DC-3s, Recip Convairs, and C-46's were all pretty common in the non-sked world in the 1960's and 70's even into the 1980's there's a few of each still operating in various places.


Raffles S.A. 29th Sep 2019 21:58


Originally Posted by XB70_Valkyrie (Post 10581586)

I'll throw out some possibilities: load/CG shift or PIC medical event on final.

Overbanking to get onto final? Looks at the image I posted above. Also 2am in the morning, in their WOCL.


cats_five 30th Sep 2019 09:22


Originally Posted by Raffles S.A. (Post 10582590)
Overbanking to get onto final? Looks at the image I posted above. Also 2am in the morning, in their WOCL.

If the turn is balanced and airspeed is constant the only extra force on the load is some g - how much depends on the angle of bank.

BRE 30th Sep 2019 10:59

Was this plane piston-engined, as the turbo retrofits were designated CV-660?

aterpster 30th Sep 2019 13:05


Originally Posted by BRE (Post 10582925)
Was this plane piston-engined, as the turbo retrofits were designated CV-660?

The only conversion I recall was the Convair 580.


EastMids 30th Sep 2019 13:09


Originally Posted by BRE (Post 10582925)
Was this plane piston-engined, as the turbo retrofits were designated CV-660?

Yes it was. Turboprop conversions are Convair 580 / 5800 (Allison 501), Convair 600 / 640 (Rolls Royce Dart) and Convair 540 (Napier Eland)

ironbutt57 30th Sep 2019 13:14

yes, it is still piston powered...(see the photo)...and the above mentioned YS-11 is a turboprop, RR Dart powered, never was a recip

ironbutt57 30th Sep 2019 13:19


Originally Posted by cats_five (Post 10582861)
If the turn is balanced and airspeed is constant the only extra force on the load is some g - how much depends on the angle of bank.

and what causes the increase in G load??? increase in angle of attack, if the speed being flown is not increased as a factor of stalling speed (min maneuver) to account for the increased AOA during the bank,or the wing is not unloaded by reducing the pitch (AOA),(thus changing the aircraft's trajectory) the classic stall/spin occurs..one of the most prevalent accident scenarios in general aviation today..

MarkerInbound 30th Sep 2019 15:52


Originally Posted by A Squared (Post 10582013)
FDR's are not required for recip aircraft, even under Part 121.

Yes, you’re right. I was remembering we had to upgrade the recorders on one of our CV fleets. It was the 600/640, not the recip.

MarkerInbound 30th Sep 2019 16:18


Originally Posted by A Squared (Post 10582014)
Not necessarily, DC-3s, Recip Convairs, and C-46's were all pretty common in the non-sked world in the 1960's and 70's even into the 1980's there's a few of each still operating in various places.

I spent most of the 80s behind 1820s, 1830s and 2800s and went through LRD a lot so I remember that business. It’s just the YS was such an oddball and to have two pilots with the type would be very rare. Piedmont, Reeve Aleutian and Mid Pac were the only major US operators.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:31.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.