50 Airbus A321XLR for AA
|
Boeing is sleeping
Thats because boeing has nothing in the single aisle long range market. Everybody wants to have the a321XLR. Boeing schould have made a B757NG. Boeing is sleeping |
As SLF I don't like single aisle on LR.:=
|
It's been nice knowing you, NMA.
|
Originally Posted by babemagnet
(Post 10497961)
Thats because boeing has nothing in the single aisle long range market. Everybody wants to have the a321XLR. Boeing schould have made a B757NG. Boeing is sleeping Every A321XLR sale potentially erodes the NMA business case. Announcement any day now... :} |
It depends on LR.
We flew B757 across the pond ten years ago (MAN - New York) and the flights were absolutely fine. Seat pitch, IFE, food, all as good as a wide-body I had experienced before. The real issue on these planes is the number of toilets available to economy class passengers. Flying in Europe on a traditional airline with different classes (Lufthansa A321) they reserve the front toilet for Business Class (say 28 people) meaning that two toilets have to serve about 166 passengers. Easy and Ryanair have three toilets for 180 passengers on A320/B737. It makes a difference on a flight if you are hanging around waiting for the toilet and disturbs passengers seated near the toilets.. |
Originally Posted by babemagnet
(Post 10497961)
Boeing schould have made a B757NG. Boeing is sleeping To do a 757NG , it would need a new engine, meaning a new engine would have needed to exist in that thrust class (~40k lbs.). Not only was that not the case, none of the engine manufactures saw a business case for developing one. In fact that's still the case - for the NMA to be viable someone will need to step forward and develop the engine. |
Boeing will make the 737-XLR a MAX with upgraded landing gear for increased MTOW and bigger fuel tanks :}
|
Originally Posted by FrequentSLF
(Post 10498052)
Boeing will make the 737-XLR a MAX with upgraded landing gear for increased MTOW and bigger fuel tanks :}
|
Timing, as they say, is everything. Boeing (apparently) wanted to do the New Small Airplane back in 2010ish, and this would have replaced both the 737 and 757. They couldn't crack large volume composite curing (think they were hoping for cold cure technology), and then were forced to compete with Airbus for the massive AA order...which gave birth to the MAX. Had they had the composite technology they wanted, the outcome could have been very different. A 797-8/9 to replace the 757 and a 797-3/4/5 (or somesuch) to replace the 737...the A320 would now be looking old hat.
|
Originally Posted by NWSRG
(Post 10498084)
Timing, as they say, is everything. Boeing (apparently) wanted to do the New Small Airplane back in 2010ish, and this would have replaced both the 737 and 757. They couldn't crack large volume composite curing (think they were hoping for cold cure technology), and then were forced to compete with Airbus for the massive AA order...which gave birth to the MAX. Had they had the composite technology they wanted, the outcome could have been very different. A 797-8/9 to replace the 757 and a 797-3/4/5 (or somesuch) to replace the 737...the A320 would now be looking old hat.
https://www.google.com/search?q=euro...81zQqb5qqi53M: |
Originally Posted by Espada III
(Post 10497992)
The real issue on these planes is the number of toilets available to economy class passengers. Flying in Europe on a traditional airline with different classes (Lufthansa A321) they reserve the front toilet for Business Class (say 28 people) meaning that two toilets have to serve about 166 passengers. Easy and Ryanair have three toilets for 180 passengers on A320/B737. It makes a difference on a flight if you are hanging around waiting for the toilet and disturbs passengers seated near the toilets..
|
On a recent shorthaul flight with BA, the two rear toilets were dis pensed with, to fit on another row of seats and part of the rear galley was taken over by a single toilet!
CB |
Look carefully Bobcat, there are two toilets down the back, the 2nd one has the cabin crew jump seat attached to the door so its easily missed. Bloody stupid layout that doesn't really work but there it is, more bums on seats is what the company want and is largely what they are getting.
|
Toilets? Really? I'm more concerned about the wing the 321 has. Hoping they redesign the thing for the XLR or an awful long time will be spent bouncing along at FL 300 while you all worry about your crappers...
|
Originally Posted by gearlever
(Post 10497963)
As SLF I don't like single aisle on LR.:=
|
NMA will be another knee jerk reaction...a frankenplane with a 767 metal hull with a 787 wing...
|
B
Boeing will make the 737-XLR a MAX with upgraded landing gear for increased MTOW and bigger fuel tank |
NMA will be another knee jerk reaction...a frankenplane with a 767 metal hull with a 787 wing... I wonder what could possibly go wrong there????? :oh: |
Originally Posted by Smythe
(Post 10499073)
B
Sorry, they already did that, its called the 737-800ERX...well, not a MAX, but .the P-8 Poseidon is based on this (as no airlines bought it) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:40. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.