PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   Airliner crash in Teheran (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/545312-airliner-crash-teheran.html)

Carbon Brakes 300 10th Aug 2014 06:13

Airliner crash in Teheran
 
Another airliner down in Teheran, Sepahan Air, no details yet, apparently on take-off, climb-out phase.:confused:

Evanelpus 10th Aug 2014 06:15

Sky News reporting up to 40 dead.

Apparently crashed into a Tehran suburb.

Dysonsphere 10th Aug 2014 06:27

BBC have it now saying "crashed AT Mehrabad airport" no other info there either

DaveReidUK 10th Aug 2014 06:36

IrAn-140 (An-140) of Sepahan Air bound for Tabas.

Reportedly came down on the outskirts of Tehran, shortly after takeoff.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bup_eoaIAAAcUJt.jpg

Toc Vil 10th Aug 2014 06:57

Said to be an AN 140 of which wing detached after T/O.

http://rt.com/news/179252-tehran-airport-plane-crash/

Passenger 389 10th Aug 2014 07:40


TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Iranian state television reports 48 people have been killed in the passenger plane crash near the capital, Tehran.

Iranian state television said 40 passengers and eight crew members were killed Sunday in the crash. The plane, operated by Sepahan Air, was heading to Tabas, a town in eastern Iran. State TV said it took off at 9:20 a.m. local time (4:50 GMT) and crashed shortly afterward.

The aircraft, an Iran-140 jet typically used for short domestic flights, crashed near Mehrabad airport, west of Tehran.
News from The Associated Press

Capetonian 10th Aug 2014 07:47

Sad news. It's an Antonov 140 built under licence in Iran. Twin turbo high wing, capacity about 50.

Dubaian 10th Aug 2014 08:45

Lots of densely built-up areas close to Mehrabad. It's at the lower, poorer part of Tehran.
(I thought it was supposed to be replaced by the new airport way out of town near the Ayatollah's Shrine?)

EDIT - Imam Khomenei International handles international flights. Mehrabad still does domestic and some Haji charters. (According to Wikipedia & the AP link above)

glendalegoon 10th Aug 2014 10:01

according to wikipedia ( I was looking up this type of plane), the accident in question indicated that a wing came off. look it up yourself.

DaveReidUK 10th Aug 2014 11:36


According to Wikipedia, the accident in question indicated that a wing came off
Or, depending on who you believe:

"[Managing-Director of Iranís Airport Company Mohammad Ilkhani] confirmed that the pilot was about to take off at the end of the runway when he lost his starboard engine and crashed the plane seconds after take-off."

Presumably he doesn't actually mean an engine failure prior to commencing the takeoff roll ...

Passenger plane crashed with 48 persons on board in Tehran

Alanwsg 10th Aug 2014 12:00

Some video of the aftermath is on liveleak / PressTV

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=879_1407658995

finfly1 10th Aug 2014 17:32

Re live leak link. AT 1:06 he mentioned McDonnell-Douglas aircraft. A few seconds later he confuses AM/PM. Fog of confusion.

twochai 10th Aug 2014 20:20

Airport elevation 4,000' ASL, 40C ambient temp, heavily loaded,

Hmmmmmm..... What could possibly go wrong?

jmmilner 10th Aug 2014 21:03

The BBC has already solved the accident so no need to continue here. In their view it is down to the poor condition of the pre-1979 aircraft still in use in Iran, all due to the US. Details of the model, age, and source of the aircraft in question don't enter into it, nor does the aircraft's history of prior accidents due to the fuel system.

LiveryMan 10th Aug 2014 21:32

I noted in a video showing the tail being lifted away that the port stabiliser has a lot of sooting/greasing that the right stabiliser doesn't.

Perhaps some sort of engine problem?

Also visible in this pic:

Photos: Antonov (HESA) An-140-100 Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net


EDIT:

Perhaps not. The port side does seem to get more greased up than the starboard:

http://www.airliners.net/photo/HESA/...fde9f54479409e

Coochycool 10th Aug 2014 22:57

Supposedly the tail hit an electricity pylon after take off.

Heard it on a TV report of uncertain source.

Does this explain why the tail structure is from the photos available apparently distinct from the majority of the wreckage?

stranger12 10th Aug 2014 23:38

it is due to us sanctions preventing Iran from buying planes.

they have no choice apart from either resorting to ukranine and russian planes which have crashed so many times in the past few years or simply stop all iranian flights which simply is not an option.

They even struggle to get parts and sometimes get uncertified parts !!

LGW Vulture 11th Aug 2014 02:05

No need for an investigation into this incident. Stranger12 has done his homework and has concluded as per above. :ugh:

Keef 11th Aug 2014 06:26

The aeroplane isn't airworthy, and the people we call"the great Satan" won't sell us any spares. Odd, that. Oh well, let's just fly it anyway.

LiveryMan 11th Aug 2014 06:32


Originally Posted by stranger12
it is due to us sanctions preventing Iran from buying planes.

they have no choice apart from either resorting to ukranine and russian planes which have crashed so many times in the past few years or simply stop all iranian flights which simply is not an option.

They even struggle to get parts and sometimes get uncertified parts !!

Care to explain the A300, A310s, A320s and A340s in Iran then?
The sanctions have not stopped them buying used "western" jets through brokers in countries that do not fall under US or European jurisdiction and are free to trade with Iran.
And yes, there are plenty of US manufactured components on Airbus models, so the sanctions would include them.

Iranian airlines operating old or sub par Russian or Ukranian metal are doing so because it's cheap. Much like a lot of African nations have airline fleets made up of older Boeing jets (737-200, DC-9, etc)


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:50.


Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.