Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Airliner crash in Teheran

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Airliner crash in Teheran

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Aug 2014, 06:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: texas
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airliner crash in Teheran

Another airliner down in Teheran, Sepahan Air, no details yet, apparently on take-off, climb-out phase.
Carbon Brakes 300 is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 06:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: on the beach
Age: 68
Posts: 2,027
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sky News reporting up to 40 dead.

Apparently crashed into a Tehran suburb.
Evanelpus is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 06:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Age: 66
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BBC have it now saying "crashed AT Mehrabad airport" no other info there either
Dysonsphere is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 06:36
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
IrAn-140 (An-140) of Sepahan Air bound for Tabas.

Reportedly came down on the outskirts of Tehran, shortly after takeoff.

DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 06:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Paris, france
Age: 71
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Said to be an AN 140 of which wing detached after T/O.

http://rt.com/news/179252-tehran-airport-plane-crash/
Toc Vil is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 07:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Iranian state television reports 48 people have been killed in the passenger plane crash near the capital, Tehran.

Iranian state television said 40 passengers and eight crew members were killed Sunday in the crash. The plane, operated by Sepahan Air, was heading to Tabas, a town in eastern Iran. State TV said it took off at 9:20 a.m. local time (4:50 GMT) and crashed shortly afterward.

The aircraft, an Iran-140 jet typically used for short domestic flights, crashed near Mehrabad airport, west of Tehran.
News from The Associated Press
Passenger 389 is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 07:47
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In transit
Age: 70
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sad news. It's an Antonov 140 built under licence in Iran. Twin turbo high wing, capacity about 50.
Capetonian is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 08:45
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sussex UK
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lots of densely built-up areas close to Mehrabad. It's at the lower, poorer part of Tehran.
(I thought it was supposed to be replaced by the new airport way out of town near the Ayatollah's Shrine?)

EDIT - Imam Khomenei International handles international flights. Mehrabad still does domestic and some Haji charters. (According to Wikipedia & the AP link above)

Last edited by Dubaian; 10th Aug 2014 at 09:06.
Dubaian is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 10:01
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: glendale
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
according to wikipedia ( I was looking up this type of plane), the accident in question indicated that a wing came off. look it up yourself.
glendalegoon is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 11:36
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
According to Wikipedia, the accident in question indicated that a wing came off
Or, depending on who you believe:

"[Managing-Director of Iran’s Airport Company Mohammad Ilkhani] confirmed that the pilot was about to take off at the end of the runway when he lost his starboard engine and crashed the plane seconds after take-off."

Presumably he doesn't actually mean an engine failure prior to commencing the takeoff roll ...

Passenger plane crashed with 48 persons on board in Tehran
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 12:00
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London
Age: 64
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some video of the aftermath is on liveleak / PressTV

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=879_1407658995
Alanwsg is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 17:32
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: long island
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re live leak link. AT 1:06 he mentioned McDonnell-Douglas aircraft. A few seconds later he confuses AM/PM. Fog of confusion.
finfly1 is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 20:20
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On the lake
Age: 82
Posts: 670
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airport elevation 4,000' ASL, 40C ambient temp, heavily loaded,

Hmmmmmm..... What could possibly go wrong?
twochai is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 21:03
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago, IL, US
Age: 73
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The BBC has already solved the accident so no need to continue here. In their view it is down to the poor condition of the pre-1979 aircraft still in use in Iran, all due to the US. Details of the model, age, and source of the aircraft in question don't enter into it, nor does the aircraft's history of prior accidents due to the fuel system.
jmmilner is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 21:32
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I noted in a video showing the tail being lifted away that the port stabiliser has a lot of sooting/greasing that the right stabiliser doesn't.

Perhaps some sort of engine problem?

Also visible in this pic:

Photos: Antonov (HESA) An-140-100 Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net


EDIT:

Perhaps not. The port side does seem to get more greased up than the starboard:

http://www.airliners.net/photo/HESA/...fde9f54479409e
LiveryMan is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 22:57
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Fife
Posts: 271
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Supposedly the tail hit an electricity pylon after take off.

Heard it on a TV report of uncertain source.

Does this explain why the tail structure is from the photos available apparently distinct from the majority of the wreckage?
Coochycool is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2014, 23:38
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it is due to us sanctions preventing Iran from buying planes.

they have no choice apart from either resorting to ukranine and russian planes which have crashed so many times in the past few years or simply stop all iranian flights which simply is not an option.

They even struggle to get parts and sometimes get uncertified parts !!
stranger12 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2014, 02:05
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Where the Money Takes Me
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No need for an investigation into this incident. Stranger12 has done his homework and has concluded as per above.
LGW Vulture is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2014, 06:26
  #19 (permalink)  

Official PPRuNe Chaplain
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Witnesham, Suffolk
Age: 80
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The aeroplane isn't airworthy, and the people we call"the great Satan" won't sell us any spares. Odd, that. Oh well, let's just fly it anyway.
Keef is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2014, 06:32
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stranger12
it is due to us sanctions preventing Iran from buying planes.

they have no choice apart from either resorting to ukranine and russian planes which have crashed so many times in the past few years or simply stop all iranian flights which simply is not an option.

They even struggle to get parts and sometimes get uncertified parts !!
Care to explain the A300, A310s, A320s and A340s in Iran then?
The sanctions have not stopped them buying used "western" jets through brokers in countries that do not fall under US or European jurisdiction and are free to trade with Iran.
And yes, there are plenty of US manufactured components on Airbus models, so the sanctions would include them.

Iranian airlines operating old or sub par Russian or Ukranian metal are doing so because it's cheap. Much like a lot of African nations have airline fleets made up of older Boeing jets (737-200, DC-9, etc)

Last edited by LiveryMan; 11th Aug 2014 at 09:18.
LiveryMan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.