PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   Pia being escorted by typhoons from man to stn (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/515553-pia-being-escorted-typhoons-man-stn.html)

MarkJJ 24th May 2013 17:23

75 taken alive, 76 in a fix, 77 going to heaven. Some one told me this wickedness.. made it easy to remember :)

5711N0205W 24th May 2013 17:55

Yes don't put squawk codes here this is a special place, instead invest 2 seconds for a quick google and they're everywhere....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transponder_(aviation)

xcitation 24th May 2013 18:54

Nutters
 
I know facts are thin on the ground however I find it frustrating that passengers can try it on at will and then if unsuccessful they could be dismissed as "sorry I thought it was the loo door and i was desperate to get in" with a slap on the wrist.
Most likely this was a genuine false alarm however it is all too easy to trigger a full emergency response and incurr huge costs and distress. I really hope there is some point of law that can be brought against these kind of nutters and set an example. There has to be some dis-incentive or else we will end with every other flight going through a anti terrorism exercise.

McTall 24th May 2013 19:52

7500 is unlawful interference (hijacking is given as an example) and the pic from Dak Man looks more like An F15 from lakenheath.

Basil 24th May 2013 21:38


7500 is Interference not hijack, (7600 Comms, 7700 Emergency).
That's all been changed because too many people knew those codes.
I can't tell you the new ones or I'd have to kill you ;)

Basil 24th May 2013 21:41

Ww/W, I'm a seaman and airman of many years experience and I can assure you that scale and distance are/is very deceptive. Eyes, camera, recollection all lie.

Blind Squirrel 24th May 2013 22:39

A pair of halfwits having a row...
 
...who proceeded to talk themselves into an arrest, per the London Evening Standard:-


It is believed a passenger on the flight allegedly threatened to blow up the plane after other passengers tried to intervene in a row he was embroiled in. Murtaza Ali Shah, a journalist, said he had spoken to a friend on board the plane, Fakhir Iqbal, a political activist, who was sitting behind the man who made the threat. Mr Shah said his friend told him: "Two guys started a row with a girl and lots of other people. Some people tried to calm them and asked them not to be rowdy and abusive. Fakhir told them to calm down. They said 'don't bloody speak to us or we will blow up the plane'. The crew came and spoke to them and they were openly threatening the staff. Fakhir went to other crew members and told them they were making threats."

Two men quizzed on mid-air 'fight' | London Evening Standard

CargoOne 24th May 2013 22:48

A silly question - what is the purpose of scrambling fighters if the comms were normal? Or let me re-phrase it: what is the chain of decision making in UK to shoot down an airliner?

Sunnyjohn 24th May 2013 22:54


Stansted is the airport of choice for the UK government to divert aircraft...
because geographically it is near the East coast in an area of low population compared to Manchester or Heathrow and also because with a prevailing wind across the UK of West to East, any incident which might involve toxicity, such as chemical or nuclear, will likely result in dangerous substances being blown out to sea, rather than over areas of dense population.

garpal gumnut 24th May 2013 23:07

All in all, a good result.

Passengers and machine safe.

A good Action by RAF, which will assist in training.

I really fail to see what all the kerfuffle is about.

Nutters or drunks will be charged.

PIA continues it's good case as an Airline of choice :eek:

Admiral346 25th May 2013 01:52


A silly question - what is the purpose of scrambling fighters if the comms were normal? Or let me re-phrase it: what is the chain of decision making in UK to shoot down an airliner?
Not so silly, me thinks.

I would think hard on who to tell what in sn incident like this. Depending on the country you are over, maybe nothing,just declare emergency and land.
There are those itchy trigger fingers...

pull-up-terrain 25th May 2013 08:24

I'm assuming there weren't any Air Marshals on board, but in a scenario like this, surely they would have intervened? I'm kind of surprised there weren't any Air Marshals on board especially from a higher risk country like Pakistan...

tonker 25th May 2013 09:36

Yesterday i asked why the moderators are they allowing the discussion of sensitive transponder codes, but the mere mention of a certain middle east airline and your immediately censored.

I am aware this information is available if you dig enough, but don't believe that it should be broadcast on a forum open to the public.

Safety first my arse.

Lon More 25th May 2013 09:59


Could it have been being escorted out of a different European Airspace to the UK, Belgium or Holland maybe, don't they have F-16s?
Seems to have happened near GOLES so would have come via MUAC Delta Sectors. SOP there is F16s

25F 25th May 2013 12:03

Why are they "sensitive transponder codes"? If there is anything secret about ATC procedures not covered somewhere in these 700 pages:
http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/ATC.pdf,
do you really think that it would be hard for the Bad Guys to find out?

overthewing 25th May 2013 12:50

The transponder codes are publicly available from many sites - just Google 'transponder codes UK' and nearly half a million results come up. Pprune is not the first result in the search. We're certainly not giving highly secret information away.

PPRuNe Radar 26th May 2013 12:25


Seems to have happened near GOLES so would have come via MUAC Delta Sectors. SOP there is F16s
There was no incident notified prior to reaching UK airspace, so although your reasoning is logical and sound, it's all simply down to the Daily Fail getting it wrong and publishing a photo from a totally different event.

We can put that part of this topic discussion to bed now.

Thanks

PR

Daermon ATC 26th May 2013 19:46

Post 33 made me chucle but instead of a DON'T PANIC button better make that a towel :ok:

Sable Knight 26th May 2013 22:49

Basil i find our story VERY hard to believe. If you ask people who have lived and worked in the middle east you will find there are two sets of rules. one set for GCC and the other for non-GCC. If you are non-GCC they are far from lenient.

Basil 27th May 2013 12:31


Basil i find our story VERY hard to believe. If you ask people who have lived and worked in the middle east you will find there are two sets of rules. one set for GCC and the other for non-GCC. If you are non-GCC they are far from lenient.
Did you mean "your story".
If so, don't listen to your friends; speak to someone who's been there, done it, got the T-shirt.
Bas - GF 4yrs living in Manama, frequent trips to DXB whilst working for CX, trips to Persian Gulf whilst working for BA.


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:06.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.