Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Go Airlines 737 Decompression

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Go Airlines 737 Decompression

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jun 2001, 23:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Trainee pilot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post Go Airlines 737 Decompression

A few days ago a Go 737 enroute from Belfast to Nice after a 7 hour delay had a decompression at 35,000 feet. It was not rapid but needless to say the oxy masks dropped out and a rapid decsent to 14,000 feet was made with a diversion back to base at Stansted. Apparently a cargo door had not been closed properly at Belfast. Go Airlines had 5 unservicable aircraft at Stansted and a further delay was forced upon the poor passengers. The worst part of it is, they made the SAME crew take the replacement to nice that same day. Might they have been a bit stressed by then to conduct a safe flight? One lucky passenger was sitting on the jumpseat throughout the said flight and witnessed all the dealings as they had 149 passengers and only 148 seats (or there abouts). Oh well, 6 sectors a day as usual!
 
Old 2nd Jun 2001, 00:07
  #2 (permalink)  
OrsonCart
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I thought that the low-cost had taken a bog out to make 149.

Go, I think, do not operate EGAA-LFMN direct???

So who is winding WHO up?
 
Old 2nd Jun 2001, 00:20
  #3 (permalink)  
Herod
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Journo alert?? BTW, Easy I believe are going to take a toilet out, but I don't think Go have.
 
Old 2nd Jun 2001, 00:26
  #4 (permalink)  
Trainee pilot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

ORSONCART:

I am not too sure why it was from Belfast but I was told the story by a member of the crew. Certainly not a wind up....
 
Old 2nd Jun 2001, 01:15
  #5 (permalink)  
Wee Weasley Welshman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Exclamation

TP - lots of factual errors there my friend but yes their was a depress resulting in a PAN state and rapid descent. A/c landed at EGSS without further incident.

No big deal.

WWW
 
Old 2nd Jun 2001, 01:37
  #6 (permalink)  
160to4DME
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

WWW is quite correct

Decompression, 7700, rapid descent, other traffic vectored clear, initially declared div to MAN, then decided to continue to STN at FL100, got direct BPK.

Total non-event.

'nuff said.
 
Old 2nd Jun 2001, 04:36
  #7 (permalink)  
Phil McCavity
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Well, just a wee event perhaps?

[This message has been edited by Phil McCavity (edited 02 June 2001).]
 
Old 2nd Jun 2001, 05:20
  #8 (permalink)  
DanJ
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Improperly closed a baggage door? They're practically idiotproof. (least, I've never had trouble with one so they MUST be idiot proof :-) )
DanJ
 
Old 2nd Jun 2001, 05:35
  #9 (permalink)  
dallas dude
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post


Trainee Pilot,

If GO were to put passengers on flight deck jumpseats there would probably be a fight amongst the other 146 "unlucky" pax.

Are you sure?

dd
 
Old 2nd Jun 2001, 11:11
  #10 (permalink)  
Yak Hunt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Sounds like a good reason to keep pax off the J/S!!! Impropely shut cargo door - don't think so!! Cargo door warning perhaps (microswitch) however the procedure is to carry on as normal if there no loss of pressure.
' Last week a crippled Airliner belonging to the Airline GO, which is owned by British Airways had a lucky escape when it made an emergency landing at Stansted. Mr Doris Scruggs who was sat in one of the pilots seats said 'The two young men done brilliant, they saved my life, and they avoided landing on a local school' This is not the only problem to have affected the beleagured Airline, a month ago a baggage trolley is believed to have touched the side of the aircraft - scratching the paint'
Imakeitup@thedailymisinformer
 
Old 2nd Jun 2001, 12:07
  #11 (permalink)  
Trainee pilot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Dallas Dude.........

As I said before and as WWW pointed out, not all of the information might be totally correct. All I know is that I was told by a member of the crew who is a good friend of mine.......perhaps after such a long delay they were desperate to get all the pax away and thought it stupid to leave one behind, I don't quite know. If it is true then he/she was a lucky B*****D and I'm very jeleaus! I always seem to get the excuse when I travel:"Sorry sir but it is a training flight today"!
 
Old 2nd Jun 2001, 15:12
  #12 (permalink)  
Raw Data
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

Trainee Pilot: sorry, but there are times (usually on the last sector of a long day) when we don't really want people on the flight deck, as they tend to ask inane questions, talk over ATC transmissions, and generally prevent us from relaxing a bit. Usually, you are most welcome... just try and respect our decision if you aren't!!

I thank you...
 
Old 2nd Jun 2001, 21:56
  #13 (permalink)  
nice_beaver
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

Accepted most of the incident seems to be mis reported, but is it legal to put a fare paying passenger on the jump seat and hence carry 149 when the insurance cover is for 148 pax???
 
Old 2nd Jun 2001, 22:07
  #14 (permalink)  
Lord Fulmer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angry

To set the record straight, ........it was apparently a rear cargo door seal that failed ,and, as to the jump seat punter, it is against company policy to carry fare paying pax on the jumpseat .
 
Old 3rd Jun 2001, 01:42
  #15 (permalink)  
E. MORSE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

A Non-event ?
No big deal ?


Excuse me !
 
Old 3rd Jun 2001, 02:22
  #16 (permalink)  
Wee Weasley Welshman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

There was no fare paid for the jumpseat. Standard emergency, standard drills, standard outcome.

WWW
 
Old 3rd Jun 2001, 15:55
  #17 (permalink)  
160to4DME
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

E Morse

It's just that as a professional body on a professional forum, I don't think we should hype up things which might attract the attention of journos who read these boards in search of nothing more than a cheap story.

Regards
 
Old 3rd Jun 2001, 18:39
  #18 (permalink)  
Lance
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink

Well I haven't laughed so much for ages. Thanks WWW for trying to get some of these skewed facts correct.
Go is insured for 149 pax.
Yes pax on jumpseat.
Yes rear cargo door seal failure.
Flight EGAA-EGSS.
Crew happy to continue duty.
 
Old 3rd Jun 2001, 21:06
  #19 (permalink)  
mach78
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

Perhaps the pax didn't concur this was a non-event at the time!?!
 
Old 3rd Jun 2001, 21:26
  #20 (permalink)  
Wee Weasley Welshman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

The Pax behaved remarkably well displaying all the traits of british stoicism that one normally assumes to be absent these days.

WWW
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.