Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

freak congo accident

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

freak congo accident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th May 2003, 20:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy freak congo accident

Scores die in freak air tragedy


More than 120 people are feared dead in the Democratic Republic of Congo after being sucked out of a cargo plane.

Military officials are quoted as saying that the rear ramp of a plane became detached soon after it had taken off from the capital, Kinshasa, on an internal flight.

Airport sources told the BBC in Kinshasa that only the Russian crew members survived.

An inquiry is said to be under way.
fruitbat is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 20:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This link will provide further information from the BBC...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/3013911.stm
jetstream7 is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 20:52
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: I'm the asshole next door
Age: 61
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just heard the same thing, except it was Singapore Airlines??
flynverted is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 21:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Africa
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Many Feared Dead in Congo After Plane Door Opens

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...tic_accident_dc

KINSHASA (Reuters) - Passengers were sucked out of a Russian-made plane over the Democratic Republic of Congo late on Thursday after a door opened accidentally during the flight, a military official said on Friday.

'The doors opened including the ramp as the pressure system broke down. Everybody was sucked out and is presumed dead,' the official in the capital Kinshasa said.

It was not immediately clear how many passengers were on board. A Russian aviation official in Kinshasa, who declined to be named, said he believed there were 129 people on board.

He said the pilot had managed to turn the plane around and land in Kinshasa after the accident.

Congo's Minister for Peace Vital Kamerhe confirmed that a cargo door had opened mid-flight and that there was some damage.

The Russian official said the plane was an Ilyushin 76 and had been chartered by the Congolese army to fly from Kinshasa to Lubumbashi, Congo's second biggest city in the southeast and home to a big military base.

He said he believed the passengers were a mixture of military officials and civilians.

The four-engined Ilyushin 76 is a versatile transport aircraft widely used in Africa, the Middle East, India and China, and remains in service despite its age because of the shortage of cargo aircraft worldwide.

The ruined state of Congo's road network means that long-distance journeys have to be made by air, though many aircraft are old and poorly maintained.
canileb is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 22:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

All pax sucked out while the plane managed to return? Doesn't that sound a little odd to you? So many mil a/c fly with an open backdoor for paradrops and stuff. Even a rapid decompression can't blow the whole cabin overboard can't it? And only special forces and their relatives onboard...
Kerosene Kraut is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 22:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No not odd. With a sudden decompression at altitude, there would be an awful drift off the ramp. The same happened to a Lockheed Galaxy carrying scores of Vietnamese orphans being evacuated during the Vietnam war before crashing. Paradrops are controlled conditions, not sudden decompressions. Remember the BAC-111 that lost its flight deck windscreen and went into Southampton? That was only at 17,000', yet it blew off the Flight Deck door and would have sucked the Captain out had he not been lapstrapped. As it was he ended up outside the aeroplane with his head getting battered on the fuselage above the window! Sudden pressurisation effects are immensely powerful, even at medium altitudes.
Notso Fantastic is offline  
Old 10th May 2003, 00:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy Freak Congo Accident

I'm with Kerosene Kraut on this one.... something very fishy! The Galaxy and BHX 1-11 incidents are not comparable (by the way Capt Tim Lancaster wasn't strapped in). If it was uncommanded ramp opening or loss the difference in pressures would have balanced swiftly..and once pressure balance was restored, passengers could not be "sucked out". Wait for the report or more news. All passengers sucked out but aircraft returns to land safely? Round up the usual suspects! BM
BoeingMEL is offline  
Old 10th May 2003, 01:21
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: HK
Age: 49
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I do not think this accident can be reported as freak. I am sure the accident was a long time coming, but I doubt the government of Congo will prove any safety violations when they are trying to fly for free or as close to it as possible. BTW, CNN reported that only the back 12 were sucked out.

BBB
bigbeerbelly is offline  
Old 10th May 2003, 02:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: England
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Received this email from an old mate: (Anyone know the IL-76 system/able to verify these possibilities?)

"The doors opened including the ramp as the pressure system broke down," a military official told Reuters news agency.

"Everybody was sucked out."


Methinks no-one checked that the rear electrically activated door-locks were made before they got airborne - or that an electrical/wiring failure unmade them (or see further more likely possibility below in italics). The C130/C133/C141/C117 rear ramp upper doors are plug type (open inwards) and cannot open while pressurized. Petal doors such as on the IL76 aren't plug-type but wouldn't (like cargo-doors) be on a ground-bus that's safely deactivated airborne. Why not? Well because it's used for aerial drops and para-trooping just like C130's. So an active inflight bus plus non-plug petal-type doors? Lethal combo. A manufactured mishap.

I'm only guessing but it's probable that to open the doors the primary latchings would have been powered away but the doors would still be held closed (against indicator-light driving microswitches) by hydraulic pressure (and then reversed hyd pressure through the door-jacks would be required to open them at a damped rate/stop them fluttering in the breeze).

But if the electrical latching had failed (at some earlier date) due to an intermittent wiring fault, they'd probably not be aware of that. Why not? Well as long as the hyd system held the doors positively closed against the microswitches, those microswitches would keep the loadmaster's panel lights and the cockpit caution lights from illuminating. However once they then had the hyd system failure that these guys had, the latent defect in the primary locks meant that they wouldn't have been there as the (now effectively) "secondary" safety-latching system...... and the doors just blow open, courtesy of the differential, as the hyd pressure falls away.

Latent undetected faults are a real bitch....particularly when they only show up at the point where their system's performance is critical.


TheShadow is offline  
Old 10th May 2003, 02:33
  #10 (permalink)  
Everything is under control.
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
7,000 feet ?!?

According to this Evening Standard article, they were sucked out at 7,000 feet. Does it still make sense?

http://www.thisislondon.com/news/art...ing%20Standard
Eboy is offline  
Old 10th May 2003, 02:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this Evening Standard article
Seems to be at odds with other reports, which include quotes from surviving passengers. How many were sucked (or fell) out remains unconfirmed (between 7 and 200 !), as does the actual passenger count. Probably be days before the real numbers are known.
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 10th May 2003, 05:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: London
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very strange things happen in Africa.

About 15 years ago there was an almost unbelievably catastrophic railway accident in Ethiopia. In spite of the fact that the state of the track means that speeds of over 15 mph are impossible, they still managed to kill over 150 people in the accident!
ockham hold is offline  
Old 10th May 2003, 06:21
  #13 (permalink)  

Still behind the curtain
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I can't understand from some of the news media is that there were injured survivors. That seems unreasonable if people were sucked out at 7,000 feet, or even lower. It seems to me that if you're out of there at that altitude without a parachute, it is all over.
LatviaCalling is offline  
Old 10th May 2003, 07:59
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm guessing here but it sounds as though the pax may not have been seated or strapped in but loaded behind some freight etc. and may even have been sitting ON the doors? Possible?
BlueEagle is offline  
Old 10th May 2003, 08:07
  #15 (permalink)  
Swounger
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: New York, NY USA
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think there's any question they were not strapped in.
Bubbette is offline  
Old 10th May 2003, 11:40
  #16 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: poll position
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blue Eagle,
Very possible.A while ago now i was drinking with a chap in africa called igor or ivan i cant remember(i'm serious) who flew the last aircraft (il76 )out of kigali. it was so full that when the ramp came up people rolled off it squashing the people on the main deck and vice versa. Still better than being chopped to little bits by a hutu with a serious chip, and an even more serious machete.
Having flown a ramp a/c round east and central africa nothing surprises me, it doesnt need a war to over fill an aircraft by a factor of two or three. dont worry the conspiricy theorists will be out in force anyway as they do for any death in africa.particularly ones connected to the establishment. any thing can kill you in africa except hiv, and natural causes, apparrantly.

just another victim of the free for all in african avaition.
jolly good fun as well.

interesting to note , not a single pprune cheesy "our thoughts are with them etc" .or is that only reserved for middleclass white pilots and their associated mishaps.How about a " ooo the poor things" at least


yours chippily

dicksy
dicksynormous is offline  
Old 10th May 2003, 16:25
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've seen a report from someone stood next to the aircraft at Kinshasa who says that one of the rear loading doors is bent back on itself.
Konkordski is offline  
Old 10th May 2003, 22:30
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Latvia, the survivors were not ejected. One describes hanging on to the (cargo ?) netting while people and things flew past. No IL-76 has 200 seats, most would have been standing/sitting on the floor. As others have said, not unknown in the 'third world'.
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 10th May 2003, 23:07
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not too sure
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
african style

I had a little flying experience in Africa and I am not surprised something like that can happen. Every time I used to walk on african aprons it was a very interesting show to watch the loading phase of the military flights: for example people hanging out from the front door while the IL 76 was already taxying, etc....
The maintenance standards are often very different from what we are used to. But that's Africa. And the flying activity in those skyies is amazing.
To understand what could have happend you have to forget the normal operations we have in mind in the "first world countries". Sorry for the poor passengers that will never fly again on the IL76.
planetblu is offline  
Old 11th May 2003, 00:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any pic available of the a/c or any of their crew's comments on what really happened?
Kerosene Kraut is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.