Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Official : British Airways Retires Concorde (merged)

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Official : British Airways Retires Concorde (merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th May 2003, 06:07
  #221 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: YBBN
Age: 50
Posts: 41
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dr Jekyll, Interesting comments. I have often wondered how much sonic booms do actually affect the population.

When I was a kid in South Wales we often heard some dull booming sounds which were alledged to be Concorde accelerating out over the Bristol channel, it wasnt that unpleasant, but then I have always been interested in aircraft.

The SR71 and the Tu144 must have flown quite a lot over land, both probably over sparsely populated areas of the former Soviet Union.
Surely the SR71 would have given away its presence on a mission with a sonic boom. Anybody like to comment.
JetFixer is offline  
Old 6th May 2003, 17:03
  #222 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, England
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0...307282,00.html

Someone has done a photoshop job on Concorde to show it in Virgin colours.
Simon W is offline  
Old 6th May 2003, 17:56
  #223 (permalink)  
mainfrog2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just for Branson and others benefit, Concorde is an Anglo-French concern ( Concord - literal dictionary definition is ' of one heart' ). If his lordship would like to see Concorde continue to fly why doesn't he go and badger Air France for some of theirs, their retiring at the end of this month I think. Concorde is about the aircraft not about the company.

Personally I agree with a few of the posts above. He's a publicity seeking ****.

If this wasn't more about giving BA a bloody nose rather than keeping Concorde flying he'd be spending some time down in France talking to AF I would think that they are just as passionate about the aircraft as the British are.
 
Old 6th May 2003, 18:07
  #224 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Notts & Derbyshire border
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow Concorde Statue

What about the model at the entrance to the LHR tunnel??
Whats going to happen to G-CONC?
I heard some Saudia businessmen offered to buy it for GBP £5 million and were turned down by BA.

It will seem pointless to stay there when BA dont operate them anymore later this year.

Or, will it just be reliveried into VS colors? who knows...
PR
BRISTOLRE is offline  
Old 6th May 2003, 21:18
  #225 (permalink)  
Mistrust in Management
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 973
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BRISTOLRE

I don't know about the model at the entrance but I'm told on reasonably good authority that a real one will be permanently on show in Terminal 5.

Thats if they can manage to tow it over there without too many bits falling off.


Regards
Exeng
exeng is offline  
Old 6th May 2003, 21:31
  #226 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Where the streets have no name...
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I personally hope that Branson gets Concorde for Virgin Atlantic, just to keep it flying. I don't see why BA don't want to sell it to him, if all they are going to do is stick it in some museum. Anyway, if they stick to the idea that absolutely no-one could operate it at a profit, seeing as Virgin is one of BA's competitors, it would make sense for them to sell them to Virgin, as they would be losing money.

Concorde is a beautiful aircraft and it has many years left in it. Just look at how long other aircraft have been flying, and how Concorde has flown comparatively little.

Anyway good luck to you Sir RB!
Wobbles is offline  
Old 6th May 2003, 22:02
  #227 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: 24/7 Hardcore Heaven
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought RB had already approached AF about buying their SSCs but BA jumped in and said that it had to be a bi-lateral agreement by BA and AF to sell them,hence no sale.Anyone know if this is true?
For those of you who think it's a bad idea for VS to get them,at least give them a fair go!They're only going to end up in the museum anyway,so RB might as well try....if he can't make a success of it,then they'll be off to the museums.I can't believe theres so much opposition from people within the industry to him at least trying to make a go of it....I'd rather that than see them end up in T5.
777

P.s those of you who question RBs motives should try reading "Dirty Tricks" by Martyn Gregory,about the BA campaign against VS in the early 90s......maybe you might understand why he acts the way that he does towards BA.
mr.777 is offline  
Old 7th May 2003, 01:00
  #228 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If Virgin did manage to get hold of BA's Concorde, I wonder would he be willing to sign a contract that ensures that if the aircraft subsequently go to a museum then they have to be painted in BA colours
Brit312 is offline  
Old 7th May 2003, 03:24
  #229 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Virgin role for Concorde has been ruled out. This BBC story quotes Patricia Hewitt as saying in a letter, ""It is not for the government to make a decision on either the cessation of Concorde services or the disposal of the aircraft concerned."
Ringwayman is offline  
Old 8th May 2003, 03:17
  #230 (permalink)  
mgc
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've only just got around to replying, Thanks to under-exposed for your posting about flynow.com (page 13) having a few of the cheapie tickets. I phoned 20 mins after your posting and got 2

Just got back from JFK, what a plane, what a loss

Have been surfing the BA website and there appears to be quite a few tickets available at around the £2300 price one way, which were not visible last week, so if you want one....
mgc is offline  
Old 8th May 2003, 20:02
  #231 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: 100 Group Country
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just heard Sir Richard on the BBC, had a good point about the Airbus support which I hadn't thought of;

"as launch customer for the A330, A340-600 and A380 we have a bit of leverage with Airbus"

Meeting with them in two weeks apparently.

Good luck
Vick Van Guard is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 00:27
  #232 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London UK
Posts: 531
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Question

Naive question I know. But why on earth would Airbus not want to sell parts to an Airline wishing to buy them?

Is it that it would involve them in a large investment which they would lose if Concorde's future service life is limited?

Or is it just that they are French?
Dr Jekyll is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 06:47
  #233 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having just watched Rod Eddington been crucified on BBC Question time- I can only give Richard Branson the best of British Luck in getting Concorde.

I think its impossible- but I'll keep every finger crossed for him
Goforfun is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 07:09
  #234 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was good entertainment seeing Rod Eddington ambushed on Question Time - not just on Concorde but on age 55 retirement! - not surprising and makes me wonder whether it was inept or just arrogant of BA to have their guy appear on QT right now - particularly without much of a brief. If you don't want to have a debate, don't walk into one!
carb is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 07:13
  #235 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't quite get over what I have just seen of Eddington.

What a plonker rodders!

Goforfun is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 07:59
  #236 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Dr. J: "Naive question I know. But why on earth would Airbus not want to sell parts to an Airline wishing to buy them?"

I am not, by nature, a conspiracy theorist but ... Airbus Industrie's link to AF is probably stronger than the one it has to BA.

Sorry to have missed Q.T. sounds like it was a giggle.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 17:08
  #237 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: 100 Group Country
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Naive question I know. But why on earth would Airbus not want to sell parts to an Airline wishing to buy them?
Branson said Airbus want to re-deploy the people who look after Concorde on to other projects, as they make more money on new aircraft than they do looking after old ones.

Its not just spare parts though, its technical support for the aircraft which is necesary to maintain the C of A.
Vick Van Guard is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 17:43
  #238 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VVG

I think you must have have misheard the bearded wonder -

VS have never had 330s that I recall, especially as they are evil things with "only two engines"

Spot on on the 380 though, something I also thought of as an "I do for you, you don't do for me" leverage issue.
MarkD is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 19:08
  #239 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Malton
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VVG

A/c maufacturers tend to discount the new price of aircraft and offer all sorts of incentives to operate new aircraft etc. (see eJ deal with Airbus).

Typically, it's in the aftersales, spares and support where manufacturers make their money.

It must be a political decision because - if Airbus were a plc and not a GIE, then they would seek to make money for their shareholders.

In this case, they would say to RB - "yes, you can av ze spares but zere are many euros (more likely US $) attached to zem". If the price were too much then RB could decide.

Got say though with ten aircraft available you could still operate say three comfortably and use the other 7 as Christmas trees -providing Airbus would continue to produce the paperwork. BA effectively did that with the "spare" whitetail at BAE Filton for many years.

I am surpised Stelios hasn't launched a bid for them as he is used to operating loss making operations. I bet he's got easyConc. already registered.

AA
Avro Arrow is offline  
Old 9th May 2003, 22:02
  #240 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

AA,

Airbus today legally is Airbus SAS not Airbus GIE anymore. It is a "normal" company owned by it's shareholders EADS and BAE Systems. And yes they want to make a profit.
Anyway I wonder how Sir Richard would manage to do so using old Concs that would need heavy reengineering for another 15 yrs in service.

Regards, Kraut

Last edited by Kerosene Kraut; 10th May 2003 at 00:28.
Kerosene Kraut is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.