BBC News: Pilot fined for terror threat
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Total tosser, deserves everything he gets; £1000 not nearly enough.
In a climate when many of us are fighting for our jobs because of Jo publics reluctance to travel, comments like this are totally inexcusable.
In a climate when many of us are fighting for our jobs because of Jo publics reluctance to travel, comments like this are totally inexcusable.
Well I'll be very interested to see how you professional aviators react to this one. Personally I think that no matter how frustrated he was about his face-to-face confrontation (and I DO sympathise with the frustrations of dealing with job's worth administrators) he showed great imaturity in dealing with it the way he did. Consequently, I would question his maturity and ability to remain calm in an emergency. Oh, and if this had been a member of the public I guess you would all have said "let him rot in jail!"
Gatvol
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: KLAS/TIST/FAJS/KFAI
Posts: 4,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds like this guy did not know the world has changed a bit since 9/11. Its refreshing to see there are people out there that make comments more stupid than some of mine.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: U.K.
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"he intended to fly an aircraft into the building - which is next door to a school"
I thought that they were over reacting - but next door to a school,
my word, he should be linched.!
I thought that they were over reacting - but next door to a school,
my word, he should be linched.!
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Planet Claire
Age: 63
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well.... I've flown a lot with this guy, which is probably more than most who'll post here.
He's a straightforward normal sort of pilot who made a boo-boo which he'll no doubt never forget.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone!
Never said anything that you wish (about a nanosecond later) you hadn't?
thought not
He's a straightforward normal sort of pilot who made a boo-boo which he'll no doubt never forget.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone!
Never said anything that you wish (about a nanosecond later) you hadn't?
thought not
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Mk. 1 desk at present...
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I want to know is...?
What I want to know is, what in hell, exactly, did the council DO to him to provoke the outburst?
Perhaps brain fade can advise...?
R1
Perhaps brain fade can advise...?
R1
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: England
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never said anything that you wish (about a nanosecond later) you hadn't?
On this scale of stupidity? I certainly havn't, have you?
No. Thought not.
Incredibly lucky to keep his job.
On this scale of stupidity? I certainly havn't, have you?
No. Thought not.
Incredibly lucky to keep his job.
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only mistake this guy made was to say something that would allow the people he was argueing with to get the upper hand. He was obviously pushed to the limits of his temper control and made a futile threat which he never intended to carry out. I strongly suspect that the people he was dealing with knew that too. This exchange obviously has nothing to do with the man's ability to perform his duties as an airline pilot. None of you who are slagging this bloke ever lost your temper then eh? I suggest you keep quiet, you weren't there.
My advice, don't get mad, get even mate.
My advice, don't get mad, get even mate.
stilljustanothernumber
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: the night sky
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I bet the provocation was severe. Also, I can't imagine that anyone actually believed he would carry out the threat. Remember the good old days when you would have been laughed at for making a complaint about such a threat? Maybe the world needs to get back to reality and stop trying to be so PC(oh, I do love a good rant)!!!!!
Grim Sleeper
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What a load of cr@p.
Talk about much ado about nothing. How many idle threats are offered in the heat of the moment that are never ever intended to be carried out (eg "I'll kill you one of these days" etc). Are we then to expect the Gestapo at our door every time we speak out of turn?
As for the professional pilots point of view, i'm with brain fade. We are all human.
Talk about much ado about nothing. How many idle threats are offered in the heat of the moment that are never ever intended to be carried out (eg "I'll kill you one of these days" etc). Are we then to expect the Gestapo at our door every time we speak out of turn?
As for the professional pilots point of view, i'm with brain fade. We are all human.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: NE Surrey, UK
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most of the posters on this thread show admirable tolerance and understanding towards a fellow human being who had a momentary lapse of rationality, whilst apparently under intense and unusual stress, and threatened an extreme action that he was unlikely to carry out in spite of being notionally capable of so doing.
I would like to think that similar tolerance and understanding would be shown to any air traveller who made a similarly unguarded outburst on the spur of the moment whilst undergoing the intense and unusual stress that can occur these days when trying to catch a flight in an overcrowded airport or discover the truth behind why one's flight has been delayed or cancelled.
Somehow though, I doubt it!
I would like to think that similar tolerance and understanding would be shown to any air traveller who made a similarly unguarded outburst on the spur of the moment whilst undergoing the intense and unusual stress that can occur these days when trying to catch a flight in an overcrowded airport or discover the truth behind why one's flight has been delayed or cancelled.
Somehow though, I doubt it!
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Planet Claire
Age: 63
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ranger
For info i believe it was a dispute with the local Council over 'Council Tax'. More than that I don't know.
I must say tho' that slagging this guy off for shooting his mouth off is a bit like slagging someone off who's involved in a flying incident. there, but for the Grace of God go any of us!
For info i believe it was a dispute with the local Council over 'Council Tax'. More than that I don't know.
I must say tho' that slagging this guy off for shooting his mouth off is a bit like slagging someone off who's involved in a flying incident. there, but for the Grace of God go any of us!
Well said Seloco! It seems that some of the above posters are advocating one rule for aircrew and another for pax. Regardless of the circumstances, in the present climate, to have vented his frustration in the manner which he did was inexcusable.
Just another number
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree BRUpax. It seems to me that some people are advocating double standards. Several airlines have banned passengers for life for making unwise comments at security. Recently a passenger was jailed in Australia for making what he thought was a humourous comment on an aeroplane.
If somebody said that he was going to come and burn your house down while you were in it, then you would go to the police and he would be prosecuted. Is this not what, in effect, this guy was saying?
He may be a nice guy, but that is not the point. He broke the law through his own stupidity and should accept the consequences.
Airclues
If somebody said that he was going to come and burn your house down while you were in it, then you would go to the police and he would be prosecuted. Is this not what, in effect, this guy was saying?
He may be a nice guy, but that is not the point. He broke the law through his own stupidity and should accept the consequences.
Airclues
Moderator
While I can't imagine why a pilot would make a statement like the one above, I also wasn't there to witness the context in which it was made.
Pilots in the states have been jailed for stating obvious facts when their personal toiletries were pilfered at passenger screening checkpoints.
There should not be a double standard. How about a common sense standard?
Pilots in the states have been jailed for stating obvious facts when their personal toiletries were pilfered at passenger screening checkpoints.
There should not be a double standard. How about a common sense standard?
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Glasgow, U.K.
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with the advocates for a little commom sense here.
When I heard about this I thought that it was a rather silly thing for any aircrew to say - especially nowadays, but when I heard who had made the remark, I was doubly surprised!
I know Ken, he is normally the most level headed sensible of people, and though not condoning what he said, it was always crystal clear to anyone who knows anything about him ( and that probably includes the council officials who complained), that there was never a snowball in hell's chance that he was in anyway serious.
If you intend to carry out a threat like that you don't do it face to face with the intended victim - especially when he knows who you are and where you live.
I also agree that there are many people prosecuted unecessarily for similar offences - mainly because they are complete strangers to the people that they are making the remarks to.
Political correctness can diminish the seriousness of the genuine threats that are with us these days, and we really need to concentrate our attentions on those who really are a threat.
When I heard about this I thought that it was a rather silly thing for any aircrew to say - especially nowadays, but when I heard who had made the remark, I was doubly surprised!
I know Ken, he is normally the most level headed sensible of people, and though not condoning what he said, it was always crystal clear to anyone who knows anything about him ( and that probably includes the council officials who complained), that there was never a snowball in hell's chance that he was in anyway serious.
If you intend to carry out a threat like that you don't do it face to face with the intended victim - especially when he knows who you are and where you live.
I also agree that there are many people prosecuted unecessarily for similar offences - mainly because they are complete strangers to the people that they are making the remarks to.
Political correctness can diminish the seriousness of the genuine threats that are with us these days, and we really need to concentrate our attentions on those who really are a threat.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South of France
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Absolutely right Seloco...!
A few weeks ago I saw a guy arrested at LHR for getting into an argument with a bolshie Despatcher. Luckily, a number of us (including air-crew) saw what happened and protested vehemently. He was released by the Police with a warning he did not deserve...presumably to save face. He could so easily been carted off as a "threat to security" and sentenced accordingly.
Given the tense situation since 9/11 and the terrorist threats currently being experienced in the UK, this Pilot was dealt with very lightly indeed. There is no excuse, surely what's good for the goose must also be good for the gander!
A few weeks ago I saw a guy arrested at LHR for getting into an argument with a bolshie Despatcher. Luckily, a number of us (including air-crew) saw what happened and protested vehemently. He was released by the Police with a warning he did not deserve...presumably to save face. He could so easily been carted off as a "threat to security" and sentenced accordingly.
Given the tense situation since 9/11 and the terrorist threats currently being experienced in the UK, this Pilot was dealt with very lightly indeed. There is no excuse, surely what's good for the goose must also be good for the gander!