Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Crash in Indonesia

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Crash in Indonesia

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Jan 2002, 18:58
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Hounslow, Middlesex, UK
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

NNT

I have made no speculation about the possible causes of the Garuda accident only posted the comment that, according to unofficial sources, the aircraft appears to have had fuel when it ditched.

As to the accident record of some of the Indonesian operators - that's just the point I indended - if you have to operate mainly in difficult terrain, in poor weather with limited aids then you can expect to have more accidents eg the stats show that, all else being equal, a non-precission approach is some 4 or 5 times more risky than a precission approach. You'll note that most of the accidents in Indonesia happen 'up country' at airports with very limited aids and in virtually every case no ILS.
MrNosy is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2002, 02:51
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: beyond PNR .. as always
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Preliminary story is both engine flame-out during descend inside Wx. at 23.000 ft. They never light up.Nor the APU (battery went flat during APU start attempt) Breaking clouds less than 8.000 ft.The crew decide ditching.
arba is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2002, 11:27
  #43 (permalink)  
Alba Gu Brath
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Merseyside
Age: 55
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Just out of interest, how much water are the engines able to ingest before flame-out? I've been through some of the rain storms in Indonesia and it's like walking through Niagara Falls.
Big Tudor is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2002, 18:40
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It used to be about 12%, but after the Tacca incident they figured that the processing energy necessary inside the engine was more related to temperature and state e.g. is the water partially contained as a frozen state like hail.

Rain is pretty insignificant in the bypass section and the amount that gets into the compressor is affected by the fan spinner shape so 12% water entering the inlet does not translate to as much as 12% going into the compressor. However like I stated earlier if you put the water into the compressor as hail it's a lot more potent.

For rough ballpark numbers it would take in excess of 30% water alone in the compressor to cause the engine to spool down at flight idle. Of course if you manage to operate the engine at something lower than placarded flight idle these numbers are meaningless.

To put it in real world standards the CFM56 engine can sustained better than one in 100 million storms
Al Weaver is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2002, 20:21
  #45 (permalink)  
Alba Gu Brath
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Merseyside
Age: 55
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Lomapaseo

Informative, succinct and polite. Not three words that describe a lot of postings on Pprune but they definately describe that one of yours. Thank you very much.

It will be interesting to see the outcome of the inquiry into this accident.

BT
Big Tudor is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2002, 06:42
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

<It will be interesting to see the outcome of the inquiry into this accident.>

I shouldn't be difficult to quickly assay the engines, for fuel, ash or compressor damage. If it's a fuel problem things will get very quite over there. If it's an ash problem, the phones will start ringing in all the international airline ops sections within hours.

If it's a weather problem, Boeing will be on this big time putting out reminders/restrictions with Airbus following suit.
Al Weaver is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2004, 17:20
  #47 (permalink)  
"The INTRODUCER"
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London
Posts: 437
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone aware of a firm diagnosis of the cause yet?
Algy is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2004, 21:43
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I heard that it was a weather problem affecting the engines.
lomapaseo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.