Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

FAA proposal: ETOPS for 4 engine a/c

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

FAA proposal: ETOPS for 4 engine a/c

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th December 2002 | 07:03
  #21 (permalink)  
Evertonian
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 13,471
Likes: 278
From: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
So, shouldn't it become EQOPS now?
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 20th December 2002 | 09:13
  #22 (permalink)  
gjp
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: TBD
4 over 2

Well said Rabbit

The quad I fly has 240 mins fire protection - thats pretty good I'd say
gjp is offline  
Old 20th December 2002 | 15:41
  #23 (permalink)  
Union Goon
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey, USA
But not all of them do, and None of them are REQUIRED to.

That is the rule that is being changed gjp. Just because your company opted to take the expense of adding the firefighting beyong the regulations required of it does not mean that all operators did.

So basically, it will be to your advantage to have etops rules extended to all aircraft as the firefighting expenses willnow have to be born by all quad operators, not just your company.

Rabbit, its not the same on all aircraft, some operators have virtually none other than the theoretical "Self smothering" compartments that worked so well for valujet down in the everglades.

Cheers
Wino
Wino is offline  
Old 20th December 2002 | 21:52
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
All US operators have been required to fit fire suppression and extinguishing equipment to aircraft cargo holds since the 2001 deadline.
Nothing new here.

And...a very good idea, IMO.
411A is offline  
Old 21st December 2002 | 03:53
  #25 (permalink)  
Union Goon
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey, USA
411a yeah but the length of supression time is being increased.

Cheers
Wino
Wino is offline  
Old 21st December 2002 | 13:15
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Timbuktu
Buster Hyman, it's being named LROPs - Long Range Ops.
maxalt is offline  
Old 21st December 2002 | 13:40
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Buster Hyman, it's being named LROPs - Long Range Ops.
Interesting, does that mean that no regard is to be taken of long routes that are over lots of land masses with lots of airports.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 22nd December 2002 | 16:40
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Timbuktu
lomapaseo there's a much better explanation of this concept at THIS link than I could give.

Last edited by maxalt; 22nd December 2002 at 20:13.
maxalt is offline  
Old 22nd December 2002 | 20:15
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Timbuktu
Apologies...link edited and now correct!
maxalt is offline  
Old 22nd December 2002 | 20:58
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 1
From: Florida
there's a much better explanation of this concept at THIS link than I could give.


Uh, thanks. However I notice that it was an Airbus document written with the statistical non-descript word may in several places justifying its intent.

I prefer to read a regulatory justification instead if it indeed has one.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 26th December 2002 | 06:22
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: Australasia
Cool

Buster and Max,

I always thought that ICAO and others referred to EROPs (Extended Range Operations), of which ETOPS was a subset specifically for twins. Mind you, that was 10 years ago so it is probably time to re-invent the wheel.
4dogs is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.