Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Are UK airlines pushing for the UK CAA to recognise EASA licences.

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Are UK airlines pushing for the UK CAA to recognise EASA licences.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th June 2025 | 16:01
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 240
Likes: 152
From: Edinburgh
Originally Posted by Old King Coal
Obtaining a UK CAA License (on the back of ones 'foreign' license) is one thing... but also required is the right to live & work in the UK (assuming that's where the G reg aircraft that one's going to fly is based) and obtaining the former does not, necessarily, beget the latter.
Well yes, that's exactly the point. The idea that making the licence transfer stupidly expensive, time consuming and stressful beause that "protects British pilot jobs for British pilots" and "stops European pilots from just transfering their EASA to a CAA and stealing jobs" doesn't really stand up.
richpea is offline  
Reply
Old 7th June 2025 | 17:05
  #42 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 954
Likes: 64
From: england
I see some UK airlines are sponsoring pilots for work permits in the U.K due to a lack of applications from Uk based pilots. Perhaps they should raise the salaries on offer?
hunterboy is offline  
Reply
Old 7th June 2025 | 19:12
  #43 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 359
Likes: 221
From: Yorkshire
Originally Posted by richpea
Well yes, that's exactly the point. The idea that making the licence transfer stupidly expensive, time consuming and stressful beause that "protects British pilot jobs for British pilots" and "stops European pilots from just transfering their EASA to a CAA and stealing jobs" doesn't really stand up.
Stop being so 'precious'!

There are many, many professions where moving from one country to another requires even more than just sitting a few exams! Depending on the country, I know of nurses, pharmacists, accountants and lawyers who face huge retraining and exams to be accepted in another country. If you want to move to another country for a job, just do what is required in that country and quit moaning about it! (I feel that I am entitled to say just that having sat the full ATPL exams in two different countries. I just got on and did it!)
NoelEvans is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2025 | 09:45
  #44 (permalink)  
V_2
20 Countries Visited
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 222
Likes: 73
From: UK
If there’s a shortage of pilots for certain UK based airlines to recruit from, they could simply introduce FUNDED training courses and recruit as many cadets as needed. Just a BA, TUI and Jet2 have done. There’s no shortage of people wanting to join this career after all
V_2 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2025 | 11:16
  #45 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 38
From: UK
Originally Posted by NoelEvans
Stop being so 'precious'!

There are many, many professions where moving from one country to another requires even more than just sitting a few exams! Depending on the country, I know of nurses, pharmacists, accountants and lawyers who face huge retraining and exams to be accepted in another country. If you want to move to another country for a job, just do what is required in that country and quit moaning about it! (I feel that I am entitled to say just that having sat the full ATPL exams in two different countries. I just got on and did it!)
I forgot your British registered 737 was different from a French registered 737.
Dannyboy39 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2025 | 13:10
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 240
Likes: 152
From: Edinburgh
Originally Posted by NoelEvans
Stop being so 'precious'!

There are many, many professions where moving from one country to another requires even more than just sitting a few exams! Depending on the country, I know of nurses, pharmacists, accountants and lawyers who face huge retraining and exams to be accepted in another country. If you want to move to another country for a job, just do what is required in that country and quit moaning about it! (I feel that I am entitled to say just that having sat the full ATPL exams in two different countries. I just got on and did it!)
But there are also many many countries that recognize qualifications across borders and that helps to facilitate both ease of recruiting workers and opens up beneficial training opportunities. With reference to pharmacists, accountants and lawyers... of course you need to retrain to work in other countries, regulatory and legal frameworks for those professions vary widely country by country.... when it comes to nurses and doctors, the same applies, and in most cases it is nurses coming from countries with lower standards of training that need to prove they can operate in more highly regulated jurisdictions. Aviation is deliberately not like this... it is the point of ICAO and the SARPS, because aviation is by nature an international endeavour. But having sat both (I assume) EASA and CAA ATPLS, you tell me... can you spot the massive difference in standards and regulations that demand that you needed to prove to two different regulators that you can operate under their (presumably) massively different standards and norms? Or did you just participate in a bureaucractic waste of time and money?
For reference, I have an airline job, based in the UK... I don't need to do anything to get a job, I have one. I just think its absurd that the CAA take the position they do, it helps no one.
richpea is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2025 | 14:51
  #47 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,970
Likes: 326
From: Hong Kong
It's absurd that you can have two people flying an identical aircraft on the same day from LHR to JFK yet one requires a CAA licence and one an FAA certificate, simply because of where the aircraft is registered.
rudestuff is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2025 | 16:39
  #48 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 359
Likes: 221
From: Yorkshire
Originally Posted by richpea
But there are also many many countries that recognize qualifications across borders and that helps to facilitate both ease of recruiting workers and opens up beneficial training opportunities. With reference to pharmacists, accountants and lawyers... of course you need to retrain to work in other countries, regulatory and legal frameworks for those professions vary widely country by country.... when it comes to nurses and doctors, the same applies, and in most cases it is nurses coming from countries with lower standards of training that need to prove they can operate in more highly regulated jurisdictions.
The rules for these qualifications vary hugely from one country to another: I know of a pharmacist whose qualifications were not accepted in one country but were perfectly acceptable in another (both being highly respected 'first world' countries). Similar happens with other professions. Life is like that.

Originally Posted by richpea
But having sat both (I assume) EASA and CAA ATPLS, you tell me... can you spot the massive difference in standards and regulations that demand that you needed to prove to two different regulators that you can operate under their (presumably) massively different standards and norms? Or did you just participate in a bureaucractic waste of time and money?
No, I never sat EASA ATPLs. Actually, the other ATPLs that I sat were more difficult than the CAA ATPLs that I subsequently sat. I don't "participate in [any] bureaucractic [[i]sic] waste of time and money", I chose carefully.

Originally Posted by rudestuff
It's absurd that you can have two people flying an identical aircraft on the same day from LHR to JFK yet one requires a CAA licence and one an FAA certificate, simply because of where the aircraft is registered.
It has always been "absurd". Many thousands of people have just got on with it for many, many decades. I suggest that you learn to do so too.
NoelEvans is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2025 | 18:24
  #49 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,970
Likes: 326
From: Hong Kong
Originally Posted by NoelEvans
It has always been "absurd". Many thousands of people have just got on with it for many, many decades. I suggest that you learn to do so too.
Don't panic, I have both anyway.
rudestuff is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2025 | 19:11
  #50 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 184
Likes: 56
From: Dubai, once... now London
Originally Posted by NoelEvans
Stop being so 'precious'!

There are many, many professions where moving from one country to another requires even more than just sitting a few exams! Depending on the country, I know of nurses, pharmacists, accountants and lawyers who face huge retraining and exams to be accepted in another country. If you want to move to another country for a job, just do what is required in that country and quit moaning about it! (I feel that I am entitled to say just that having sat the full ATPL exams in two different countries. I just got on and did it!)
5 years ago the UK CAA was a pillar of the EASA regulations. Overnight they switched to “EASA? What’s that?”. So your examples do not make sense.
nickler is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2025 | 22:22
  #51 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 359
Likes: 221
From: Yorkshire
Originally Posted by nickler
... Overnight they switched to “EASA? What’s that?”. ...
When I gained my UK CAA ATPL, EASA did not exist. Neither did the JAA. So yes, “EASA? What’s that?”

Live with it!!
NoelEvans is offline  
Reply
Old 9th June 2025 | 19:26
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 240
Likes: 152
From: Edinburgh
Originally Posted by NoelEvans
The rules for these qualifications vary hugely from one country to another: I know of a pharmacist whose qualifications were not accepted in one country but were perfectly acceptable in another (both being highly respected 'first world' countries). Similar happens with other professions. Life is like that.
Pretty much exactly my point. The rules for a pharmacist, or a lawyer, or a teacher, or a nurse, vary by country because they have very different approaches, laws and regulations by country. Aviation does not have massively different rules and standards across jurisdictions, for the most part, they are purposely kept similar.

Originally Posted by NoelEvans
No, I never sat EASA ATPLs. Actually, the other ATPLs that I sat were more difficult than the CAA ATPLs that I subsequently sat. I don't "participate in [any] bureaucractic [[i]sic] waste of time and money", I chose carefully.
If you never sat EASA ATPLs why are you engaging in a conversation how people should just accept they are different, when you have no knowledge to back that up?


Originally Posted by NoelEvans
It has always been "absurd". Many thousands of people have just got on with it for many, many decades. I suggest that you learn to do so too.
Originally Posted by NoelEvans
When I gained my UK CAA ATPL, EASA did not exist. Neither did the JAA. So yes, “EASA? What’s that?”

Live with it!!
So because you gained your licneses many year ago at a time when everything was much more convoluted and difficult, people should just suck it up and live with it being more convoluted and difficult again for no reason because "how'd ya like them apples"? To be honest, exactly the "I'm old enough for it to not effect me" attitude of the average ignorant Brexiteer... live with it!
richpea is offline  
Reply
Old 10th June 2025 | 09:19
  #53 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 386
Likes: 134
From: N/A
Originally Posted by richpea
So because you gained your licneses many year ago at a time when everything was much more convoluted and difficult, people should just suck it up and live with it being more convoluted and difficult again for no reason because "how'd ya like them apples"? To be honest, exactly the "I'm old enough for it to not effect me" attitude of the average ignorant Brexiteer... live with it!
Self-proclamed "more difficult" if I may add...
bulldog89 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th June 2025 | 21:54
  #54 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 73
Likes: 9
From: UK
Reciprocity

I think any decision by the UK CAA to recognise EASA licences would need full reciprocity.
The UK behaved in a much more cordial and gown up way than EASA in that the UK recognised EASA licences for 2 years. As far as I know there was nil recognition the other way round. Rather childish I thought.
SAM 2M is offline  
Reply
Old 20th June 2025 | 20:10
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 178
Likes: 8
From: UK
Originally Posted by kenparry
It was dogma - EASA is ultimately overseen by a European court, and that was deemed to be unacceptable by the "purist" Brexiteers.

Ho hum.
Remaining in EASA would have meant that a small number of UK citizens would, for limited purposes, be ultimately subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. A prospect completely unacceptable to the Conservative government.
Then the Conservative government signed up to the Windsor Framework for Northern Ireland which meant that a small number of UK citizens would, for limited purposes, be ultimately subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.
Rivet gun is offline  
Old 21st June 2025 | 02:24
  #56 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 696
From: Brit living in Malaysia
From a personnel licensing point of view, I would suggest that the easiest solution is one which is used in most of the rest of the world - an endorsement on one's licence. EASA licence holders would be given a UK CAA endorsement on their EASA licence once they are given a job in UK on a G Reg aircraft. The licence would be for a fixed period (2-3 years) but renewable with contract renewal. But, similarly, that means that UK CAA licence holders would have to be given an EASA endorsement on identical terms if they were offered a job in the EU. Issues such as which TRI/TRE can carry out check/training and on who and in which sim should be fairly simple to resolve. It keeps the UK CAA licence 'sovereign' but gives each host country control over the continued use of the respective licence as it would control the endorsement. It would also keep UK licence holders out of ECJ jurisdiction and allow for a larger/shared pool of pilots to work throughout EU/UK - subject to residency etc. No technical reason for it not to work easily but politics is another matter!

Last edited by BANANASBANANAS; 21st June 2025 at 02:43.
BANANASBANANAS is online now  
Reply
Old 21st June 2025 | 06:07
  #57 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,970
Likes: 326
From: Hong Kong
You don't need to be a member of EASA to recognise it. The CAA director (is that a job title?) could determine that an EASA licence is valid in UK aircraft with a stroke of a pen.
rudestuff is offline  
Reply
Old 21st June 2025 | 07:29
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2024
Posts: 574
Likes: 429
From: Outbush
Originally Posted by rudestuff
It's absurd that you can have two people flying an identical aircraft on the same day from LHR to JFK yet one requires a CAA licence and one an FAA certificate, simply because of where the aircraft is registered.
Actually it is not. You could be operating said aircraft in a totally different environment. For example, operating an A320 in Europe with almost total radar coverage and in controlled airspace is completely different to operating the A320 in Australia with CTAFs, operating in the open FIR (not in controlled airspace), extreme weather variations on any given day, or operating the same aircraft in Asia.
If you are going to base yourself with a local carrier based overseas from where you are, then it’s essential to at least sit a series of conversion exams and a skills test. Maybe not the full 15 exams, but enough to make you competent in your new area of operation
Newhairdo is offline  
Reply
Old 21st June 2025 | 07:31
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2024
Posts: 574
Likes: 429
From: Outbush
Originally Posted by rudestuff
You don't need to be a member of EASA to recognise it. The CAA director (is that a job title?) could determine that an EASA licence is valid in UK aircraft with a stroke of a pen.
It would have to be written into the regulations.
The problem is, too many regulators appear to act in their own interest rather than in the interests of aviation. In many cases, this may be down to inexperienced staff.
Newhairdo is offline  
Reply
Old 21st June 2025 | 10:05
  #60 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,970
Likes: 326
From: Hong Kong
Originally Posted by Newhairdo
Actually it is not. You could be operating said aircraft in a totally different environment. For example, operating an A320 in Europe with almost total radar coverage and in controlled airspace is completely different to operating the A320 in Australia with CTAFs, operating in the open FIR (not in controlled airspace), extreme weather variations on any given day, or operating the same aircraft in Asia.
If you are going to base yourself with a local carrier based overseas from where you are, then it’s essential to at least sit a series of conversion exams and a skills test. Maybe not the full 15 exams, but enough to make you competent in your new area of operation
Thats what the OMC is for. It covers ITCZ , icing, local winds etc. Ultimately anyone operating a big jet IFR globally should have broadly the same knowledge and experience. They certainly can't be expected to hold a licence for every country they operate to but for some reason we tie them to a specific registration and expect them to get a new licence to switch registrations even if they're operating to exactly the same places. A wing is a wing, a cloud is a cloud, bernoulli works the same everywhere. Air law or some kind of AIP exam should be the global standard for conversion between ATPLs.
rudestuff is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.