Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Embraer to introduce 'automatic take-off' for E2s

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Embraer to introduce 'automatic take-off' for E2s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd August 2024 | 06:43
  #41 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 402
Likes: 240
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by Peter H
There will be no statistics to support that claim until there have been millions of pilot-less flights made. As the reliability of current two-man crews is less that one hull loss per million flights.
Imagine saying this in the 1980s:

“As the reliability of current three-man crews is greater than one hull loss per million flights.”

And yet here we are; with two-man crews. So removing a human reduced risk.

The problem to solve is the human factor.
BoeingDriver99 is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2024 | 22:48
  #42 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 198
Likes: 1
From: france
Hello all,
E2TS , if installed and enabled in the operational setup menu, arms the autopilot on the ground
when the pilot pushes the toga button . The pilot still need to manually rotate the aircraft at VR,
the autopilot will automatically engage when the aircraft passes 200ft climbing. That’s all.
Without the E2TS the pilot still can engage the autopilot passing 200ft
Basically the system enables an automatic engagement of the autopilot passing 200ft.
Without it the pilot may engage the autopilot by manually pushing the autopilot button passing
200ft.
blackmail is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2024 | 05:45
  #43 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 629
Likes: 187
From: Netherlands
Originally Posted by blackmail
Hello all,
E2TS , if installed and enabled in the operational setup menu, arms the autopilot on the ground
when the pilot pushes the toga button . The pilot still need to manually rotate the aircraft at VR,
the autopilot will automatically engage when the aircraft passes 200ft climbing. That’s all.
Without the E2TS the pilot still can engage the autopilot passing 200ft
Basically the system enables an automatic engagement of the autopilot passing 200ft.
Without it the pilot may engage the autopilot by manually pushing the autopilot button passing
200ft.
I'm pretty sure it does more, because that would not reduce the take off distance.
procede is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2024 | 06:29
  #44 (permalink)  
V_2
20 Countries Visited
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 222
Likes: 73
From: UK
Originally Posted by procede
I'm pretty sure it does more, because that would not reduce the take off distance.
the system is designed to increase the RTOW, which is not the same as reducing the take off distance. For example if you are obstacle clearance limited
V_2 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2024 | 07:29
  #45 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 385
I seem to remember Boeing discussed a similar optional system some years ago. The core concept was some new autopilot function that would do very steep climbs right after takeoff, still safe and within the envelope, but with not much margin left. It flew right at the steepest angle, steeper than human pilots would typically do it, therefore improving climb, time to altitude and fuel burn. Not sure what happened to it.
Less Hair is online now  
Reply
Old 14th October 2024 | 13:17
  #46 (permalink)  
100 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 105
Likes: 130
From: Asheville
Originally Posted by Less Hair
I seem to remember Boeing discussed a similar optional system some years ago. The core concept was some new autopilot function that would do very steep climbs right after takeoff, still safe and within the envelope, but with not much margin left. It flew right at the steepest angle, steeper than human pilots would typically do it, therefore improving climb, time to altitude and fuel burn. Not sure what happened to it.
Imagine being an unsuspecting passenger during that maneuver. 😉
W9SQD is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2024 | 14:06
  #47 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 385
It might have been the first day when the last rows of economy were served first.
Less Hair is online now  
Reply
Old 14th October 2024 | 15:53
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 345
From: UK
"…that would do very steep climbs right after takeoff, still safe and within the envelope…"

As I recall, that was for a consistent close-in noise abatement procedure.

As pax in a manual manoeuvre - Orange County; pre takeoff special briefing by Capt, but even so surprising. Perhaps automation was to achieve consistency when close to acceptable performance margins; turbulence in that situation would make me nervous.
AFAIK the system was not developed, probably the operator saw little benefit for the cost.

The Embraer system is about takeoff performance over the fence:-

"The Climb-Optimized Takeoff System is an aircraft functionality aimed at improving the takeoff performance. The improvement is obtained by allowing the airplane to rotate to an optimized pitch attitude at and after VR, … "

https://patents.google.com/patent/EP2533122A2/en

download pdf for description: https://patentimages.storage.googlea...P2533122A2.pdf
safetypee is online now  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.