Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Latest Boeing News

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Latest Boeing News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Apr 2024, 21:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: S.E.Asia
Posts: 1,954
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Latest Boeing News

Claims that Boeing knew of safety flaws in the manufacture of one of its largest passenger jet aircraft, but covered them up to speed production, are under investigation by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), according to a reports.

The information came from a whistleblower inside the beleaguered US aircraft maker, and relates to the structural integrity of the 787 Dreamliner jet, a report published by the New York Times alleges.

The engineer, identified as Sam Salehpour, told the newspaper that sections of the fuselage of the Dreamliner were improperly fastened together and could eventually break apart mid-flight.

Salehpour said he had worked for the company for more than a decade, including on the jets in question, and claimed Boeing employed “shortcuts” in the manufacturing process intended to reduce production bottlenecks – but which ultimately compromised safety.
WASHINGTON, April 9 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is investigating a Boeing whistleblower's claims that the company dismissed safety and quality concerns in the production of the planemaker's 787 and 777 jets, an agency spokesperson said on Tuesday.In a statement, Boeing said it was fully confident in the 787 Dreamliner, adding that the claims "are inaccurate and do not represent the comprehensive work Boeing has done to ensure the quality and long-term safety of the aircraft."
Boeing shares were down nearly 2% at $178.19 on Tuesday afternoon after the FAA confirmed the investigation, which was first reported by the New York Times.

Boeing engineer Sam Salehpour said he identified engineering problems that affected the structural integrity of the jets and claimed Boeing employed shortcuts to reduce bottlenecks during the 787 assembly process, his attorneys said in a release.In a statement,
Reuters was not able to independently verify the whistleblower's claims.
Source https://www.theguardian.com/business...igation-report and https://www.reuters.com/business/aer...ts-2024-04-09/

Last edited by Mike Flynn; 9th Apr 2024 at 21:27.
Mike Flynn is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2024, 22:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: same planet as yours
Posts: 550
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
More of the same: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/09/u...le-blower.html
DIBO is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2024, 22:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 855
Received 202 Likes on 111 Posts
Could people heading to the press about problems include specific detail about what the shortcut was and what they believe the effect of it to be?

No doubts about some shortcut and no tolerance for them, but knowing the potential problem gives a bit more information for risk management. Is this "may allow a leak to develop at 10,000 landings" or "these should be grounded immediately?"
MechEngr is online now  
Old 9th Apr 2024, 22:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Within AM radio broadcast range of downtown Chicago
Age: 71
Posts: 848
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Complete "Agree" with MechEngr as to importance of knowing the particulars insofar as any engineering, manufacturing and production, and potentially certification, issues are concerned.

For the present, this SLF/attorney comments that the individual raising these concerns has engaged the services of a truly heavy-hitter attorney. Based only on press reports and absolutely no personal knowledge whatsoever, consider that Attorney Debra Katz, founding partner of Katz Banks Kumin in Washington, has already evidently driven extensive media and press coverage, and arranged for a spotlight appearance before Ccongress.

From the New York Times article: "Mr. Salehpour’s concerns are set to receive an airing on Capitol Hill. Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut and the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee’s investigations subcommittee, is planning to hold a hearing with Mr. Salehpour on April 17. Mr. Blumenthal said he wanted the public to hear from the engineer firsthand.

'Repeated, shocking allegations about Boeing’s manufacturing failings point to an appalling absence of safety culture and practices — where profit is prioritized over everything else,' Mr. Blumenthal said in a statement." (internal quotation as in NYT article).

And, according to the law firm's website, Attorney Katz was "[r]ecognized by the Washington Post as 'the feared attorney of the #MeToo movement,' [and she] has been successfully litigating employment discrimination, civil rights, and whistleblower protection cases for nearly 40 years." (internal quotation as in original)

In my law firm years I had exactly one matter defending claims brought by a D.C. whistleblower legal specialist; there was pretty extensive use of press releases (it was circa 2006) and it was, in a word, a wild ride. (Health care field, not aviation, client). Based on all this, and discounting some for "politics", Boeing appears highly likely to be gettin' into some chop over this, I'll bet.

[proper form of law firm name corrected, WR 6-3]



Last edited by WillowRun 6-3; 9th Apr 2024 at 22:50.
WillowRun 6-3 is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2024, 23:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Seattle
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And of course to balance the blood sucking lawyers viewpoint above… the 737 Max has smashed to pieces 346 people.

346 people are dead and unrecognisable due to Boeing mismanagement and failings. And that’s only until the next disaster.
BoeingDriver99 is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2024, 23:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Under the radar, over the rainbow
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WillowRun 6-3
Based on all this, and discounting some for "politics", Boeing appears highly likely to be gettin' into some chop over this, I'll bet.
Yes, I'd make the same bet. Katz's firm didn't take this case without being very confident that it has legs. Almost certainly, Salehpour doesn't have nearly deep enough pockets to pay for the level of representation that this will require, which means that Katz & Co. have probably agreed to fund it. And that means that they expect recovery under whistleblower statutes is likely.
OldnGrounded is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2024, 23:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Within AM radio broadcast range of downtown Chicago
Age: 71
Posts: 848
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BoeingDriver99
And of course to balance the blood sucking lawyers viewpoint above… the 737 Max has smashed to pieces 346 people.

346 people are dead and unrecognisable due to Boeing mismanagement and failings. And that’s only until the next disaster.
Excuse me, but that slam on lawyers doesn't apply to yours truly. My interest in threads on this site isn't to be found in any form of pecuniary gain. You might take note, for example, of the extensive (totally voluntary and - happily - unpaid in any way) work I did on-thread, attempting to derail the unfair scapegoating prosecution of Forkner. I am NOT taking any credit for his being found not-guilty.... but it was the outcome for which I advocated in a good number of posts.

No apologist for Boeing here, and if you can point to even one single solitary post within the past 10 years on this forum where I have expressed a viewpoint intended to line my own or anyone else's pockets, do tell.
WillowRun 6-3 is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 03:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,208
Received 133 Likes on 60 Posts
WR 6-3

I value your lawyerly perspective as it brings additional context to important issues. I hope you continue to contribute to this forum.
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 04:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good luck pal trying to taint the 777 which in 31 years of service has had 8 hull losses where all the deaths were due to either pilot error / input (Asiana SFO, MH370) or external factors (SAM hit over the Ukraine). Zero deaths due to Boeing defects. In terms of years in the sky, the safest plane (if we take into account no Boeing faults in the 3 death-related accidents)

Better have deep pockets for the slander lawsuits against you that will be forthcoming by Boeing - I am strictly referring to the 777 which I have intimate knowledge in.

Enjoy your 15' of fame pal
.
Claybird is online now  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 07:45
  #10 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ WR 6-3
" The dogs bark but the caravan pass by " ( Arab and French proverb) Do not pay too much attention , your input and legal remarks on this forum are highly appreciated as it gives another side perspective and brings knowledge most of us do not have. .
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 07:53
  #11 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the CNN web there is a quote from the whistleblower
“I literally saw people jumping on the pieces of the airplane to get them to align,” Salehpour said. “By jumping up and down, you’re deforming parts so that the holes align temporarily … and that’s not how you build an airplane.”
If true and can be sustained by a video or by more witnesses , then this will become another nightmare for the Boeing PR team .
But it it is all made up to attract attention and cannot be sustained , then we enter another game .
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 08:52
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: s england
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Claybird
Good luck pal trying to taint the 777 which in 31 years of service has had 8 hull losses where all the deaths were due to either pilot error / input (Asiana SFO,

.
Ok I’ll bite on this one.
iirc this incident involved the APFDS in a mode that would not provide speed protection. I’ve seen posters adorned to walls warning of the A/T speed trap. The use of the word TRAP is telling. I believe there is /was a mod to change the logic.
To simply say pilot error is somewhat simplistic imho.
sudden twang is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 08:59
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Far East
Posts: 227
Received 40 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
On the CNN web there is a quote from the whistleblower

If true and can be sustained by a video or by more witnesses , then this will become another nightmare for the Boeing PR team .
But it it is all made up to attract attention and cannot be sustained , then we enter another game .
Video is probably too much to ask. Other witnesses, yes. To confirm the whistleblowers credibility. But it sounds very specific - and terrible.

Another way: if he remembers the day it happened, maybe the airframe(s) can be identified and that particular part inspected for evidence?
waito is online now  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 09:02
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Too far South
Age: 50
Posts: 120
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Claybird
Good luck pal trying to taint the 777 which in 31 years of service has had 8 hull losses where all the deaths were due to either pilot error / input (Asiana SFO, MH370) or external factors (SAM hit over the Ukraine). Zero deaths due to Boeing defects. In terms of years in the sky, the safest plane (if we take into account no Boeing faults in the 3 death-related accidents)

Better have deep pockets for the slander lawsuits against you that will be forthcoming by Boeing - I am strictly referring to the 777 which I have intimate knowledge in.

Enjoy your 15' of fame pal
.
Until the wreckage of MH370 is found, and the CVR and FDR analysed, you have no way of knowing what the cause of its disappearance was. The flight could have been down to pilot error, it could just as easily have been a sudden decompression which incapacitated the crew and the autopilot just kept on flying until it fell out of the sky.
Lomon is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 09:07
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: If this is Tuesday, it must be?
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Claybird
Good luck pal trying to taint the 777 which in 31 years of service has had 8 hull losses where all the deaths were due to either pilot error / input (Asiana SFO, MH370) or external factors (SAM hit over the Ukraine). Zero deaths due to Boeing defects. In terms of years in the sky, the safest plane (if we take into account no Boeing faults in the 3 death-related accidents)

Better have deep pockets for the slander lawsuits against you that will be forthcoming by Boeing - I am strictly referring to the 777 which I have intimate knowledge in.

Enjoy your 15' of fame pal
.
A total red herring since he is talking about the 787, not the 777
BizJetJock is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 09:43
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Age: 46
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Claybird
Good luck pal trying to taint the 777 which in 31 years of service has had 8 hull losses where all the deaths were due to either pilot error / input (Asiana SFO, MH370) or external factors (SAM hit over the Ukraine). Zero deaths due to Boeing defects. In terms of years in the sky, the safest plane (if we take into account no Boeing faults in the 3 death-related accidents)
On that train of thought, the A340 wins hands down, with no fatalities whatsoever in 33 years. And the A380 for example has not even had a single accident, with the exception of QF32.

procede is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 10:15
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clarty Waters, UK
Age: 58
Posts: 950
Received 60 Likes on 31 Posts
And the 787 itself has had zero hull losses and zero fatal accidents / incidents in 15 years of service.
Andy_S is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 10:19
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,075
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Not fatal but it had those battery fires early on.
Less Hair is online now  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 13:52
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Under the radar, over the rainbow
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WillowRun 6-3
No apologist for Boeing here, and if you can point to even one single solitary post within the past 10 years on this forum where I have expressed a viewpoint intended to line my own or anyone else's pockets, do tell.
I've read your posts for most of that decade and have never seen the slightest indication that you've done any such thing. You're a valuable contributor to these conversations.
OldnGrounded is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2024, 14:39
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by BizJetJock
A total red herring since he is talking about the 787, not the 777
Multiple news sources are reporting that the whistleblower is alleging problems with both the 787 and 777.

I thought the problem of 787 fuselage section mating tolerances was known and already addressed.
BFSGrad is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.