Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Pilots of United Boeing 737 report striking drone on takeoff from San Francisco

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Pilots of United Boeing 737 report striking drone on takeoff from San Francisco

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Mar 2024, 16:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,020
Received 2,900 Likes on 1,242 Posts
Pilots of United Boeing 737 report striking drone on takeoff from San Francisco

United Boeing 737 MAX9 was on the initial climb when the pilots reported they had probably hit a drone.

The aircraft (registration N37535) climbed to 5,000 ft when the pilots contacted the tower and requested to return to SFO.

The flight was vectored back to SFO on runway 28R.An American Airlines pilot, waiting for takeoff, reported that animals were crossing the runway.

The flight landed 40 minutes after departure with 187 souls onboard after ILS approach.

It’s still not sure if the Boeing 737 MAX really hit a drone or if it was a more common birdstrike.

https://airlive.net/emergency/2024/0...​​
Spoiler
 
NutLoose is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2024, 16:45
  #2 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's Sean's turn
Posts: 1,889
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Boeing really have shot themselves in the foot with the Max haven't they? This would not have happened if it was an Airbus!
Chesty Morgan is online now  
Old 31st Mar 2024, 18:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: EHEH
Posts: 532
Received 243 Likes on 77 Posts
Originally Posted by Chesty Morgan
Boeing really have shot themselves in the foot with the Max haven't they? This would not have happened if it was an Airbus!
Lol, good one Chesty!
FUMR is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2024, 19:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Alberta
Posts: 281
Received 17 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
https://airlive.net/emergency/2024/0...​​
Spoiler
 
​​​​​​​FAA now claiming it was a bird strike so guessing they found bird remains
Bksmithca is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2024, 23:07
  #5 (permalink)  
Psychophysiological entity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tweet Rob_Benham Famous author. Well, slightly famous.
Age: 84
Posts: 3,270
Received 37 Likes on 18 Posts
Given that the European Robin has a Head Up Display in its right eye, it remains to be seen. (see what I did there)

Really, angle of dip data is fed to its right eye.
Loose rivets is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2024, 23:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Loose rivets
Given that the European Robin has a Head Up Display in its right eye, it remains to be seen. (see what I did there)

Really, angle of dip data is fed to its right eye.
What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?
B2N2 is online now  
Old 31st Mar 2024, 23:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Originally Posted by B2N2
airspeed velocity
Interesting concept... ​​​​​​​
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2024, 01:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Capn Bloggs
Interesting concept...
​​​​​​​https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_con...ture=emb_title
B2N2 is online now  
Old 1st Apr 2024, 03:26
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Melbourne,Vic. Australia
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by B2N2
What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?
African or European……
Cunning_Stunt is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2024, 09:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 1,634
Received 135 Likes on 64 Posts
A return for a drone/birdstrike with no report of evidence of damage? Sounds a bit extreme doesn't it?
meleagertoo is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2024, 13:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: US
Age: 66
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
A return for a drone/birdstrike with no report of evidence of damage? Sounds a bit extreme doesn't it?
If you hit a decent sized bird on a cockpit window it sounds like a small explosion in the cockpit. Would you be comfortable pressurizing the aircraft fully while sitting next to that window?
Sailvi767 is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2024, 08:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 1,634
Received 135 Likes on 64 Posts
Certainly happy if not visibly damaged, why ever not?
meleagertoo is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2024, 13:34
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,221
Received 407 Likes on 253 Posts
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
A return for a drone/birdstrike with no report of evidence of damage? Sounds a bit extreme doesn't it?
How about this PoV: if the crew chose to return, I'll not second guess them. It was their call to make.
They made their own risk assessment based on what info they had, and if they chose conservatively so be it.
Lonewolf_50 is online now  
Old 2nd Apr 2024, 20:13
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wherever I go, there I am
Age: 43
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Certainly happy if not visibly damaged, why ever not?
I should think that if their initial observation was that they hit a drone and not, as seems to have happened, a bird, then I should also think they were more concerned about those parts of the aircraft that cannot be seen from the front.

While I would tend to agree with you where the strike is obvious and it is clear there was no damage done continue on, it doesn't sound as though that was the impression here. In which case, excellent job to ensure the safety of all onboard.
+TSRA is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2024, 23:22
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: US
Age: 66
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
Certainly happy if not visibly damaged, why ever not?
You would have no idea what damage may have occurred to the structure not visible from inside the cockpit. The kinetic energy from even a modest sized bird is enormous at 250 knots. I hit a bird at 250 knots in a USN trainer and the aircraft never flew again. Most of the structural damage was not visible. I had what we considered a minor strike in another aircraft that broke a frame internally. A visual inspection showed nothing until they borescoped inside.

Sailvi767 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2024, 00:07
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Within AM radio broadcast range of downtown Chicago
Age: 71
Posts: 849
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
How about this PoV: if the crew chose to return, I'll not second guess them. It was their call to make.
They made their own risk assessment based on what info they had, and if they chose conservatively so be it.
Like button, "on."
WillowRun 6-3 is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2024, 11:41
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: England
Age: 78
Posts: 158
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much of the external can be seen from inside? Glad you have retired.
Shytehawk is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.