Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

TAP extra long landing

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

TAP extra long landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jul 2023, 08:47
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Anywhere and nowhere
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
Wonderful comments from people that do not know how to fly ..Trial by youtube again .. Looking at the winsock in the end of the video that gives a clue as to what most probably hapenned. The A320 has good brakes but a go around would have most probably be better, but we do not know which fuel they had. and what the conditions were in Porto Santo. .Anyway they made it OK in the end , so good landing by the old definition.
Sorry but no. If you know how to fly, you know that was a mandatory go-around. If they're short on fuel, they shouldn't be there in the first place.
Definitely not a good landing, a terrible one actually.
Newcomer2 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2023, 09:16
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I assisted to a SIM for new CPT being trained for FNC, the first thing that said the TRI is : 'The only thing you must be capable, is to take the decision to go around"
IFLYyouBREATH is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2023, 10:12
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
A stable approach and a landing in the TDZ are two not necessarily mutual things. The approach looked great to me, given it was a circle. Plenty of nose-up the whole way in, no drastic pitch or roll yugs.

The landing: had they gone down another 2 feet it would have been perfect, right on the big white squares. Unfortunately, they overflared just a tad and the rest is history.

If there's any doubt, there's no doubt. Go around!
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 2nd Jul 2023, 11:55
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,292
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
The windsock is horizontal. A sudden gutload of headwind and you’ve just gained 20kts as you were about to grease it on.
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2023, 13:42
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 754
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
I am not an armchair expert as I actually did the job into this challenging airport. I was FNC qualified for many years on the B737. That approach and landing was firstly too long and secondly characterised by a lack of discipline. They were extremely fortunate to stop. Those with long memories will recall a horrendous run off the end by a B727 with many fatalities and by the same airline. Not much point having stabilisation criteria and a disciplined approach to landing in the tdz if you are not going to comply. I agree FNC can be challenging and I did my share of go arounds. Always take lots of fuel…
olster is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2023, 14:21
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: EHEH
Posts: 532
Received 239 Likes on 76 Posts
Originally Posted by olster
I am not an armchair expert as I actually did the job into this challenging airport. I was FNC qualified for many years on the B737. That approach and landing was firstly too long and secondly characterised by a lack of discipline. They were extremely fortunate to stop. Those with long memories will recall a horrendous run off the end by a B727 with many fatalities and by the same airline. Not much point having stabilisation criteria and a disciplined approach to landing in the tdz if you are not going to comply. I agree FNC can be challenging and I did my share of go arounds. Always take lots of fuel…
No disagreement, but just for the record at the time of the B727 accident the runway was only 5200 feet long leaving even less margin for error than today. It is now 9100 feet long.
FUMR is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2023, 22:23
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Bradford, Ontario
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Greta_Thunberg
'Old definitions' be dammed, we've learned better definitions. With all due respect, your thoughts on the matter are a little out of date.
But even in the good old days, the 'old definitions' were not meant to be taken literally, no? And just to be pedantic, by the 'old definitions', this was a *great* landing.
400guy2 is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2023, 04:18
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: australasia
Posts: 431
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Not all that familiar with the 320 configurations, however to my untrained eye, he doesn't seem to be carrying much in the way of flap.
Any comments from more experienced eyes appreciated.
Maui
maui is online now  
Old 3rd Jul 2023, 06:25
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: FL390
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by maui
Not all that familiar with the 320 configurations, however to my untrained eye, he doesn't seem to be carrying much in the way of flap.
Any comments from more experienced eyes appreciated.
Maui
There are only two flap configurations on the A320 series - 3 and full. It's difficult to float an A320 in config 3 unless you get a gust in the flare or have added a significant speed increment to Vapp.

I don't think configuration is relevant here since the tendency to float is totally different to the obviously flawed decision making that went on in this landing, to the extent, in fact, that I thought initially that this was a Microsoft Flight Simulator video posted as a troll.
Fursty Ferret is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2023, 07:48
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 754
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
Yes I agree FUMR, you are quite correct, the old runway was seriously short and I should have mentioned that when quoting the catastrophic overrun of the TAP B727. I flew in to the old short, FNC as a youthful (!) first officer on the Boeing 737-200 and it was a fairly buttock clenching exercise…
olster is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2023, 07:52
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oz
Posts: 903
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
I honeslty can't fathom some of the comments, this board has certainly lost it's technical expertise in the 20 years I have been on here.

For me, this landing would definitely qualify for a "please see the Chief Pilot" message in that crews inbox. I would have ripped a new one in one of my student pilots on his first solo, let alone a jet crew.
nomorecatering is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2023, 08:10
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 754
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
I am not sure who you are aiming at nomorecatering but I have personally flown into Funchal on many occasions in challenging and other conditions. I even flew into the as mentioned short version of the airport which contributed significantly to the fear factor. I am not keen on Willy waving but with 25 years on the B737 and 20,000 hours plus associated training quals just how much technical expertise do you need? I really apologise for any perceived immodesty but I have done the day job into FNC as have many other contributors. I have looked over this thread and nobody appears to be condoning what is obviously a badly flown approach underpinned by serious indiscipline which should have resulted in a go around by any company standards. Nobody appears to be disagreeing…
olster is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2023, 08:30
  #33 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's Sean's turn
Posts: 1,888
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by FUMR
No disagreement, but just for the record at the time of the B727 accident the runway was only 5200 feet long leaving even less margin for error than today. It is now 9100 feet long.
5200 feet is probably about what the TAP had left...
Chesty Morgan is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2023, 09:03
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cyprus
Posts: 522
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
TAP Extra Long Landing

Olster ; we might have gone in there together. "Make sure you take lots of fuel"- yes but remember, way back, we were probably LW restricted. We probably worked for a professional outfit but one cowboy outfit would have you in the office for taking 1kg more than FP fuel- anywhere.

Most of us took TFS alternate fuel. If weather was perfect, PortoSanto.. Bort, it sure was butt-clenching all the way, using either alternate.

Interesting read on the Wizzair thread into Madeira too.

As John posted;" glad it's all over".
Gordomac is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2023, 09:49
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Chesty Morgan
5200 feet is probably about what the TAP had left...
Looking at the video it seems to have touched down about level with the 3000 ft to go marker, which means that's about 5000 ft past the threshold.
dixi188 is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2023, 16:23
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Marlow (mostly)
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Off topic but...

Can anyone point to a fix for the problem where the relevant links are just not showing in the post?
slast is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2023, 16:45
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Earth until ..........
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Time to touchdown after Threshold

Never operated into this airport but the airplane took approximately 20 seconds from crossing over the threshold to touchdown ( should be 7-8 seconds normally).
B888 is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2023, 18:36
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That was textbook, great job!
Contact Approach is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2023, 21:20
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Contact Approach
That was textbook, great job!
I think this thread is living in a parallel universe.

Land within the touchdown zone or go-around. This landing was unacceptable for a commercial airline operation.
Dct_Mopas is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2023, 23:01
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: not where I want to be
Posts: 521
Received 49 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by dixi188
Looking at the video it seems to have touched down about level with the 3000 ft to go marker, which means that's about 5000 ft past the threshold.
Having had a quick look via a GIS I concur.

Originally Posted by FUMR
No disagreement, but just for the record at the time of the B727 accident the runway was only 5200 feet long leaving even less margin for error than today. It is now 9100 feet long.
There were also heavy showers, poor vis with 7 Octa's, and they had nil effective braking due to aquaplaning. IIRC there may have been a tailwind component as well. Making no comment on this approach/landing whatsoever, but the conditions are quite different.

FP.
First_Principal is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.