Are Easyjet taking advantage.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: near EGKK
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Running the risk of further slating and becoming a new GUV, let me put these three points to you all.
Ryanair operate from LGW DUB STN to name 3. All major airports in my book.
Even with a refund free rebook policy, if your operating low yield, low load flights(Not all are 83%)it's financial sense to park it refund pax and save a few grand.
Stellios first stated that flights were cancelled to help take pressure off over crowded sky's. Were the skys over crowded (any more than usual) perhaps he was expecting flights to return sooner than they did, in fact he probably was good on ya Stellios. That still leaves the question why did others not follow?
As stated earlier I regret naming EZY in the question title, but, I can't change it!
[ 18 September 2001: Message edited by: Desk Driver ]
Ryanair operate from LGW DUB STN to name 3. All major airports in my book.
Even with a refund free rebook policy, if your operating low yield, low load flights(Not all are 83%)it's financial sense to park it refund pax and save a few grand.
Stellios first stated that flights were cancelled to help take pressure off over crowded sky's. Were the skys over crowded (any more than usual) perhaps he was expecting flights to return sooner than they did, in fact he probably was good on ya Stellios. That still leaves the question why did others not follow?
As stated earlier I regret naming EZY in the question title, but, I can't change it!
[ 18 September 2001: Message edited by: Desk Driver ]
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DD -
As stated several hundred times on this thread - we cancelled flights to make our programme workable with the increased DTLR security requirements on the ground - plus our own increased security requirements. Proof we're taking the issue very seriously. Which bit don't you understand ????
What RYR or anyone else do, does not interest me as long as EZY flights are as safe as we can make them for pax and crew.
Moderator - please amend this disgusting thread title. I knew many people that worked in the Pentagon, and I would not work for a company that would take advantage of their tragic loss as suggested by the title here.
As stated several hundred times on this thread - we cancelled flights to make our programme workable with the increased DTLR security requirements on the ground - plus our own increased security requirements. Proof we're taking the issue very seriously. Which bit don't you understand ????
What RYR or anyone else do, does not interest me as long as EZY flights are as safe as we can make them for pax and crew. Moderator - please amend this disgusting thread title. I knew many people that worked in the Pentagon, and I would not work for a company that would take advantage of their tragic loss as suggested by the title here.
