Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

EasyJet to cut A319 to 150 Seats

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

EasyJet to cut A319 to 150 Seats

Old 8th May 2022, 13:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 36
EasyJet to cut A319 to 150 Seats

EasyJet to take out seats so it can fly with fewer crew
By Simon Browning
BBC News 2022.05.09

"By taking out the back row of seating on its A319 fleet, EasyJet said it will be able to fly with three cabin crew instead of four."
EddyCurr is offline  
Old 8th May 2022, 13:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: It used to be an island...
Posts: 236
They did that a few years ago on a trial from STN (maybe other bases too). They blocked the centre seats in the first three rows, then had the SCCM on their own up front. Easy crews don't slack at the best of times but the poor SCCM on the flights I saw was at it non stop the whole flight - boarding pax, pre departure checks, handling the ground staff, announcements, then setup of the buffet, run the buffet down the front of the aircraft on their own, take down the buffet, prepare for landing... very very busy the whole time.

The trial didn't last long. As far as I know the crew weren't very happy with it (and crew then could seek other opportunities if they wanted, and now they can seek them even faster). I also think it hit the boarding and therefore turnaround time, and the F&B revenues because it took longer for one crew to serve than two.

At least taking out the rear row is removing the worst seats in the aircraft - each seat is 5cm narrower than the usual seats.

I appreciate Easy are pretty desperate for crew (who isn't?), but they're going to have to be careful not to burn out the existing crew. This might be a better idea for longer flights, where there's a no-service mid-section of the flight, rather than the short ones like intra-UK, Amsterdam, Ireland, etc.
nicolai is offline  
Old 8th May 2022, 16:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockport MAN/EGCC
Age: 68
Posts: 973
I suspect this is the difference between redundancy and furlough policy showing through ?
The AvgasDinosaur is offline  
Old 8th May 2022, 18:30
  #4 (permalink)  
bnt
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin, Ireland. (No, I just live here.)
Posts: 726
I heard something related on a podcast the other day: Betty In the Sky talked about how her airline may reduce cabin service on international flights, so that they can reduce staff to the minimum required by FAA regulations.
bnt is offline  
Old 8th May 2022, 18:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 13,932
Originally Posted by nicolai View Post
At least taking out the rear row is removing the worst seats in the aircraft - each seat is 5cm narrower than the usual seats.
Presumably you mean that the overall width of the rearmost triple is 2 inches less, rather than each individual passenger's seat ?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 8th May 2022, 22:17
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,075
Somewhat of a non-story whipped up by know-nothing BBC journalists. Where's Raymond Baxter when you need him ?

Easyjet have not added any A319s to the fleet for some years, only A320s. So the larger aircraft are not involved in this. The A319s are now I believe the minority fleet.

I always thought it bizarre for Easy to specify a 156-seat A319, with the further added cost of the double overwing exit. The chances of selling those last six seats are only a fraction of flights they make, possibly less than 20% of flights, yet the added costs of an extra FA are required on every flight, because the cabin crew requirement is based on seats fitted, not sat in, and every other A319 operator I'm aware of only fits up to 149 seats. In fact I wonder why Easy did not do this long ago.

If you are short of crew then going for a step which reduces crew requirements seems sensible.

If, like most LCCs, the cabin crew are on incentive commission for cabin sales, which is then divided among the crew on board, dividing the commission three ways instead of four will appeal to some.

Last edited by WHBM; 9th May 2022 at 06:55.
WHBM is online now  
Old 8th May 2022, 22:37
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 36
EasyJet Fleet Matrix:

A319: 55 (3 parked) - 34%
A320: 97 (2 parked) - 60%
A321: 10 - 6%
.
as per PlaneSpotters.net (last update: 2022.05.08)
EddyCurr is offline  
Old 8th May 2022, 23:22
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Age: 47
Posts: 86
That would be UK only. For EZY as a group the numbers would be:

319: 92 -29%
320: 214 -67%
321: 15 -4%



Originally Posted by EddyCurr View Post
EasyJet Fleet Matrix:

A319: 55 (3 parked) - 34%
A320: 97 (2 parked) - 60%
A321: 10 - 6%
.
as per PlaneSpotters.net (last update: 2022.05.08)
A319 is online now  
Old 8th May 2022, 23:45
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 36
Originally Posted by A319 View Post
That would be UK only. For EZY as a group the numbers would be:

319: 92 (5 parked) -29%
320: 214 (4 parked) -67%
321: 15 -4%
Thank you.

A319's adjusted numbers for EasyJet (Group) Fleet Matrix as per PlaneSpotters.Net (last update 2022.05.08)
EddyCurr is offline  
Old 9th May 2022, 08:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 13,932
Originally Posted by WHBM View Post
I always thought it bizarre for Easy to specify a 156-seat A319, with the further added cost of the double overwing exit. The chances of selling those last six seats are only a fraction of flights they make, possibly less than 20% of flights, yet the added costs of an extra FA are required on every flight, because the cabin crew requirement is based on seats fitted, not sat in, and every other A319 operator I'm aware of only fits up to 149 seats. In fact I wonder why Easy did not do this long ago.
IIRC, at the time EasyJet ordered the A319 the aircraft was limited to 145 seats with the single E/E, so the ability to fit 156 seats generated almost 8% more ASKs per flight. I would be very surprised if the 4th F/A increased DOCs by that amount - presumably EZY's bean-counters had sharpened their pencils.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 9th May 2022, 08:22
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 747
I seem to recall that when Easy were purchasing the Airbuses they proposed doing this but the legal requirement for cabin crew was based on seats certificated not seats fitted and thus had to employ a fourth crew member much against their will.
Or is this senility setting in?
meleagertoo is online now  
Old 9th May 2022, 10:12
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 99
Originally Posted by meleagertoo View Post
I seem to recall that when Easy were purchasing the Airbuses they proposed doing this but the legal requirement for cabin crew was based on seats certificated not seats fitted and thus had to employ a fourth crew member much against their will.
Or is this senility setting in?
What is "seats certificated"? So every A380 operator would have to carry crew for 800 passengers? It is the number of seats installed that determines crew requirements, you could install 19 seats and not have any flight attendants.
Alan Baker is offline  
Old 9th May 2022, 11:19
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: in the sky
Posts: 104
Or worse, I used to fly a BBJ2, we had 19 seats, bedroom etc...... and only One Cabin Crew, I am sure she would have liked the extra help 3 others would have brought though.
Brian Pern is offline  
Old 9th May 2022, 20:44
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 13,932
Originally Posted by Dct_Mopas View Post
So leaving ezy with A319ís sporting unnecessary twin overrwing exits and still needing 4 crew.
Surely it's the presence of the twin E/Es that has permitted EZY to carry 156 pax ?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 10th May 2022, 00:45
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,376
So basically 1/3 of the fleet is A319. My previous employer had a couple in 144 configuration which was tight enough. Ended up getting rid of them as the operating cost wasn't that far enough below the A320 to justify losing 36 seats, and it couldn't cover a swap when a full A320 went AOG.

Customised aircraft tend to have lower value on the second hand market as potential buyers are put off adding something which requires different training or spares holding compared to the rest of their fleet. Bog standard is much easier to sell.

​​​​

krismiler is offline  
Old 10th May 2022, 01:15
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 36
Originally Posted by Brian Pern View Post
... I used to fly a BBJ2, we had 19 seats, bedroom etc...... and only One Cabin Crew, ...
BBJ2 (aka 737-800).

Hmph. So someone configured a BBJ2 for 19 seats, then only provisioned it with one Cabin Crew ?

So nouveau riche ...
EddyCurr is offline  
Old 10th May 2022, 14:22
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: U.K.
Posts: 548
No, mealeagertoo, you are absolutely correct. Virtually none of the flight deck were involved in the 737 or A319 decision, but it took a couple of senior flight deck to point out once the spec was finalised that with 156 seats you had to have 4 cabin crew. But rarely are the full 156 seats sold was the reply. To which we said it was number of seats, not number of passengers.
The twin overwings were a result of wanting to pack in 156 passengers.

Last edited by kriskross; 10th May 2022 at 14:24. Reason: extra info
kriskross is offline  
Old 10th May 2022, 17:19
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: France
Age: 66
Posts: 81
Well that didn't take long

Considering this was in the news only a couple of days ago, Mrs R came home on an Easyjet A319 today. She had been allocated seat 26B. you can guess the rest.
Repos is offline  
Old 10th May 2022, 18:25
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: gatwick
Age: 48
Posts: 141
Originally Posted by EddyCurr View Post
BBJ2 (aka 737-800).

Hmph. So someone configured a BBJ2 for 19 seats, then only provisioned it with one Cabin Crew ?

So nouveau riche ...

If only you knew. How about a G650 out in front to check for turbulence. Now that's true.

Not me, but a good mate who was following on the BBJ.

That's style.
rotorwills is offline  
Old 10th May 2022, 18:49
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 13,932
Originally Posted by Repos View Post
Considering this was in the news only a couple of days ago, Mrs R came home on an Easyjet A319 today. She had been allocated seat 26B. you can guess the rest.
She had to stand ?
DaveReidUK is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.