Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

PIA A320 Crash Karachi

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

PIA A320 Crash Karachi

Old 22nd May 2020, 12:09
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Muscat, Oman
Posts: 45
So the had a go-around because of landing gear extension issue and then dual engine flame-out?! Doesn't make sense.

https://www.aviation24.be/airlines/p...achi-pakistan/

Live ATC (4:47)
oxide is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 12:17
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 50
Posts: 1,600
Originally Posted by tubby linton View Post
Fuel penalty with the gear extended is 180%
Still you'd need to do quite a few circuits to exhaust all your reserve fuel assuming "normal" operations. Hard to tell but from the posted footage landing gear does not seem extended.
No ADS-B data available apparently
My only reasonable explanation would be a very bad case of bird strike but I'm sure they would have reported it..
atakacs is online now  
Old 22nd May 2020, 12:18
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 1,798
Engine noise

The video that claims to be from the last moments of the flight has audible engine noise (doesnít look or sound like it is in surge).

The video may turn out to be something other than claimed of course.

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 12:21
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Potomac Heights
Posts: 468
I'm betting on technical problem leading to go-arounds -- and in focus on fixing technical problem, forgetting about fuel state and flame out. It has happened before. United Airlines in 1978. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...nes_Flight_173
SeenItAll is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 12:25
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northants
Age: 41
Posts: 111
There's 5.5 mins between the go-around and impact.... Doesn't that make lack of fuel less likely?
KarlADrage is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 12:28
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Posts: 707
Iím not sure if that video showing the port side is the real deal. Seems like a normal approach to me. If it is the video, then glide speed is good and I assume they simply landed short. Gear is down.

PoppaJo is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 12:34
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Middle East
Posts: 331
There is a post crash fire. Fuel exhaustion highly unlikely.
metro301 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 12:35
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Oslo
Posts: 23
Flight time from Lahore to Karachi appears normal. Impossible that it was a fuel leak that went undetected flying overland, many alternates. Improper fuelling in Lahore? Did they forget to retract gear for some reason, or that the gear didn't retract?
aerobus123 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 12:47
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 136

This just up on the net. Both engines are charred underneath significantly. Light smoke behind engines.
Flava Saver is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 12:48
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: same planet as yours
Posts: 267
The bottom video of this tweet (marked 'The video of #planecrash') is a low quality video (probably capturing on-screen playback of a security cam??), apparently shows an a/c crashing


DIBO is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 12:48
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Posts: 707
There is no alert on the 320 if you choose to fly gear down the entire trip. Itís been done before. There would be significant noise flying in such configuration also.

However they would be aware of such low fuel state prior to the first approach. Why the heck would anyone even contemplate a missed approach with nothing in the tanks. Which is why I would be opening up the engineering books!

PoppaJo is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 12:48
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sudbury, Suffolk
Posts: 181
Originally Posted by Flava Saver View Post

This just up on the net. Both engines are charred underneath significantly. Light smoke behind engines.
eek. ran them along the ground ??
Maninthebar is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 12:53
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 11,885
Quick-and-dirty vertical profile from 5000', per FR24 data:



DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 12:55
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Midlands
Posts: 6
Originally Posted by Flava Saver View Post
This just up on the net. Both engines are charred underneath significantly. Light smoke behind engines.
Did they forget to lower the gear on the first landing attempt?!
ZH871 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 13:00
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: same planet as yours
Posts: 267

DIBO is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 13:01
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 186
WOW! Those engines look like they've been run around the ground to me..... Gear up landing, lifted of again, engines failed due to damage, crashed?
logansi is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 13:02
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sudbury, Suffolk
Posts: 181
Originally Posted by Bob Viking View Post
I can see what you’re thinking but the FR24 track shows a go around before 0 feet.

BV
KHI elevation is 100ft......
Maninthebar is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 13:04
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In the shadow of R101
Posts: 239
Could the dirty lower nacelles be due to oil leaks, maybe over the whole flight? I know it's both engines but maybe there was some sort of systematic maintenance error.

If the oil loss is total then both engines could run down due to lack of lubrication.
Feathers McGraw is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 13:07
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 7
Originally Posted by DIBO View Post
...
Bloody hell...
Are we sure this is the aircraft from today? RAT looks deployed, the engine undersides look quite bad... The left one has bits hanging off oft he lip?
drdino is offline  
Old 22nd May 2020, 13:10
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Boston USA
Age: 64
Posts: 74
Originally Posted by ZH871 View Post
Did they forget to lower the gear on the first landing attempt?!
Looking closely at the lower edge, definitely looks like a little bit of damage? (Both engines) It could be heat haze or graininess of the image though.
jewitts is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.