A380 combi conversion underway
Thread Starter
A380 combi conversion underway
https://aeronewsglobal.com/lufthansa...go-conversion/
A potentially very interesting use for the A380 given the likely future flying environment, which will surely be focused on consolidating the few travelling pax to hub to hub routes. Keep upper deck for pax, main deck and lower decks for cargo. The whale may live to turn over a buck or two for its operators yet.
A potentially very interesting use for the A380 given the likely future flying environment, which will surely be focused on consolidating the few travelling pax to hub to hub routes. Keep upper deck for pax, main deck and lower decks for cargo. The whale may live to turn over a buck or two for its operators yet.
https://aeronewsglobal.com/lufthansa...go-conversion/
A potentially very interesting use for the A380 given the likely future flying environment, which will surely be focused on consolidating the few travelling pax to hub to hub routes. Keep upper deck for pax, main deck and lower decks for cargo. The whale may live to turn over a buck or two for its operators yet.
A potentially very interesting use for the A380 given the likely future flying environment, which will surely be focused on consolidating the few travelling pax to hub to hub routes. Keep upper deck for pax, main deck and lower decks for cargo. The whale may live to turn over a buck or two for its operators yet.
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: earth
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very interesting indeed.
But why on earth would anyone invest in a dead horse?
I bet you could haul more pax and freight with two 330ies (pax + freighter) and the whole operation would even be cheaper.
Please let the whale die in convenient dignity with the excuse of Corona.
But why on earth would anyone invest in a dead horse?
I bet you could haul more pax and freight with two 330ies (pax + freighter) and the whole operation would even be cheaper.
Please let the whale die in convenient dignity with the excuse of Corona.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Age: 46
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That could be said right now for the entire aerospace industry, especially the MAX..
The A380 might carry the same weight, but will be able to carry a lot more volume. Most package freighters are volume limited.
The A380 might carry the same weight, but will be able to carry a lot more volume. Most package freighters are volume limited.
Last edited by procede; 6th May 2020 at 08:20.
Pegase Driver
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like it is just the same solution Airbus has devised for the 330/350 - i.e. PKCs secured to the cabin floor to save pilling boxes up on the seats (still requiring the hand loading of boxes)
Auxiliary freighters useful for the crisis (and retired soon after if I was a betting man)
Auxiliary freighters useful for the crisis (and retired soon after if I was a betting man)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very interesting indeed.
But why on earth would anyone invest in a dead horse?
I bet you could haul more pax and freight with two 330ies (pax + freighter) and the whole operation would even be cheaper.
Please let the whale die in convenient dignity with the excuse of Corona.
But why on earth would anyone invest in a dead horse?
I bet you could haul more pax and freight with two 330ies (pax + freighter) and the whole operation would even be cheaper.
Please let the whale die in convenient dignity with the excuse of Corona.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Been around the block
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,899
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Yes, a combi is something else. Very few have been operated in the U.S. as far as I know. There are a couple of civilian registered B-734 combis currently used to carry nukes and commandos for the Department of Energy. Alaska Airlines operated B-734 combis on its Milk Run route ANC-SEA until 2017.
FedEx and UPS each had 10 A380 freighters on order and millions were spent on airport facility upgrades at MEM and SDF before the orders were cancelled.
FedEx and UPS each had 10 A380 freighters on order and millions were spent on airport facility upgrades at MEM and SDF before the orders were cancelled.
[QUOTE=Airbubba;10774551]Yes, a combi is something else. Very few have been operated in the U.S. as far as I know. There are a couple of civilian registered B-734 combis currently used to carry nukes and commandos for the Department of Energy. Alaska Airlines operated B-734 combis on its Milk Run route ANC-SEA until 2017.
Canadian North operates several 737 Combis according to their website. I think there are others as well but the airlines serving Northern Canada change a lot. Pretty common for Northern communities at one time.
Canadian North operates several 737 Combis according to their website. I think there are others as well but the airlines serving Northern Canada change a lot. Pretty common for Northern communities at one time.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,899
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
There were some 727 combis made. Reeve Aleutian and Air Mike (Continental Micronesia) operated them I think.
And didn't Eastern and Braniff operate 727 QC's with interiors that could carry seats or pallets?
UPS operated five 727-100s with Rolls engines that had swappable cargo and pax interiors. The interiors were supposed to be usable on any of the five aircraft but, well, the holes didn't exactly line up.
And didn't Eastern and Braniff operate 727 QC's with interiors that could carry seats or pallets?
UPS operated five 727-100s with Rolls engines that had swappable cargo and pax interiors. The interiors were supposed to be usable on any of the five aircraft but, well, the holes didn't exactly line up.
Last edited by Airbubba; 7th May 2020 at 01:41.
It would be very, very difficult to certify a combi to the current regulations - note that all the combi's reference above were certified decades ago. The current regulations for fire protection, passenger/freight segregation, etc. make a combi cert far harder than it used to be. Hard to meet for new production aircraft - probably close to impossible for retrofit of an existing aircraft.
The linked article is short on details, but it doesn't sound like they are talking major structural mods (side cargo door and strengthened floor) - rather it's simply provisioning for a package freighter with hand-loading of the cargo (as others have already been doing with other passenger aircraft). Something that could be readily undone when/if the passenger market comes back.
An A380 Package Freighter conversion will still be handicapped by the A380's low MZFW, capping the total payload at about 85 tons - considerably less than the 777F (~100 tons) with far higher operational costs. Further, I don't even want to think about what the turn time of a A380PF would be with the main deck cargo hand loaded
. Probably a niche freighter aircraft at best.
The linked article is short on details, but it doesn't sound like they are talking major structural mods (side cargo door and strengthened floor) - rather it's simply provisioning for a package freighter with hand-loading of the cargo (as others have already been doing with other passenger aircraft). Something that could be readily undone when/if the passenger market comes back.
An A380 Package Freighter conversion will still be handicapped by the A380's low MZFW, capping the total payload at about 85 tons - considerably less than the 777F (~100 tons) with far higher operational costs. Further, I don't even want to think about what the turn time of a A380PF would be with the main deck cargo hand loaded
. Probably a niche freighter aircraft at best.Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There were some 727 combis made. Reuve Aleutian and Air Mike (Continental Micronesia) operated them I think.
And didn't Eastern and Braniff operate 727 QC's with interiors that could carry seats or pallets?
UPS operated five 727-100s with Rolls engines that had swappable cargo and pax interiors. The interiors were supposed to be usable on any of the five aircraft but, well, the holes didn't exactly line up.
And didn't Eastern and Braniff operate 727 QC's with interiors that could carry seats or pallets?
UPS operated five 727-100s with Rolls engines that had swappable cargo and pax interiors. The interiors were supposed to be usable on any of the five aircraft but, well, the holes didn't exactly line up.
PSU units folded up when cargo configured. Empty weight was somewhat higher than the standard -100s resulting in a slightly increased burn rate, but fuel was pretty cheap back in the lates 60's and early 70's. When you walked into the cabin you KNEW it was a QC as they were kind of beat-up. Standard freight cargo door on port side.
I remember one particular QC had to be significantly crossed trimmed to fly straight.
One of them crashed on takeoff from KORD (1968?) and was demolished. The 3 pilot crew was injured but all survived. Inadvertent selection of 2deg flaps vice 5deg for takeoff.
Eastern had 727QCs, but I'm not certain about Braniff.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Age: 46
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, a combi is something else. Very few have been operated in the U.S. as far as I know. There are a couple of civilian registered B-734 combis currently used to carry nukes and commandos for the Department of Energy. Alaska Airlines operated B-734 combis on its Milk Run route ANC-SEA until 2017.
