Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

A380 combi conversion underway

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

A380 combi conversion underway

Old 6th May 2020, 02:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: BNE, Australia
Posts: 311
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
A380 combi conversion underway

https://aeronewsglobal.com/lufthansa...go-conversion/

A potentially very interesting use for the A380 given the likely future flying environment, which will surely be focused on consolidating the few travelling pax to hub to hub routes. Keep upper deck for pax, main deck and lower decks for cargo. The whale may live to turn over a buck or two for its operators yet.
chuboy is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 04:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Where the Money Takes Me
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to remember that LHT were at the forefront of the first VVIP A380 conversion. That went well.

This will undoubtedly go the same way.
LGW Vulture is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 04:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 312
Received 20 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by chuboy
https://aeronewsglobal.com/lufthansa...go-conversion/

A potentially very interesting use for the A380 given the likely future flying environment, which will surely be focused on consolidating the few travelling pax to hub to hub routes. Keep upper deck for pax, main deck and lower decks for cargo. The whale may live to turn over a buck or two for its operators yet.
Reportedly Airbus is designing similar mods for the 330 and 350. All change!
Pearly White is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 05:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: earth
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very interesting indeed.

But why on earth would anyone invest in a dead horse?
I bet you could haul more pax and freight with two 330ies (pax + freighter) and the whole operation would even be cheaper.

Please let the whale die in convenient dignity with the excuse of Corona.
glofish is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 05:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,834
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Knew you wouldn't stay quiet for long on this thread glofish
White Knight is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 06:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,863
Received 221 Likes on 104 Posts
A380 combi conversion underway

The article - correctly - does not use the word "combi".
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 07:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Age: 46
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by glofish
But why on earth would anyone invest in a dead horse?
That could be said right now for the entire aerospace industry, especially the MAX..
Originally Posted by glofish
I bet you could haul more pax and freight with two 330ies (pax + freighter) and the whole operation would even be cheaper.
The A380 might carry the same weight, but will be able to carry a lot more volume. Most package freighters are volume limited.

Last edited by procede; 6th May 2020 at 08:20.
procede is online now  
Old 6th May 2020, 07:05
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Age: 46
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
The article - correctly - does not use the word "combi".
Unloading the top deck might be a bit of an issue.
procede is online now  
Old 6th May 2020, 08:03
  #9 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,701
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by glofish
Very interesting indeed.

But why on earth would anyone invest in a dead horse?
Please let the whale die in convenient dignity with the excuse of Corona.
I bet you some said the same about the DC10/MD11 at the time ..
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 08:28
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Looks like it is just the same solution Airbus has devised for the 330/350 - i.e. PKCs secured to the cabin floor to save pilling boxes up on the seats (still requiring the hand loading of boxes)

Auxiliary freighters useful for the crisis (and retired soon after if I was a betting man)
Diverskii is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 09:59
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,092
Received 68 Likes on 42 Posts
A Combi is something else.
Less Hair is online now  
Old 6th May 2020, 10:28
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by glofish
Very interesting indeed.

But why on earth would anyone invest in a dead horse?
I bet you could haul more pax and freight with two 330ies (pax + freighter) and the whole operation would even be cheaper.

Please let the whale die in convenient dignity with the excuse of Corona.
Hmmm, why did the shipping industry over the sea go to giant container ships? Could it be because it was cheaper to load/unload one ship instead of several at a time?
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 17:18
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Been around the block
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lomapaseo
Hmmm, why did the shipping industry over the sea go to giant container ships? Could it be because it was cheaper to load/unload one ship instead of several at a time?
dock space is one reason.
4runner is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 17:31
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
The article - correctly - does not use the word "combi".
Yes, a combi is something else. Very few have been operated in the U.S. as far as I know. There are a couple of civilian registered B-734 combis currently used to carry nukes and commandos for the Department of Energy. Alaska Airlines operated B-734 combis on its Milk Run route ANC-SEA until 2017.

FedEx and UPS each had 10 A380 freighters on order and millions were spent on airport facility upgrades at MEM and SDF before the orders were cancelled.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 17:59
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: US
Posts: 507
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
[QUOTE=Airbubba;10774551]Yes, a combi is something else. Very few have been operated in the U.S. as far as I know. There are a couple of civilian registered B-734 combis currently used to carry nukes and commandos for the Department of Energy. Alaska Airlines operated B-734 combis on its Milk Run route ANC-SEA until 2017.

Canadian North operates several 737 Combis according to their website. I think there are others as well but the airlines serving Northern Canada change a lot. Pretty common for Northern communities at one time.
20driver is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 18:23
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There were some 727 combis made. Reeve Aleutian and Air Mike (Continental Micronesia) operated them I think.

And didn't Eastern and Braniff operate 727 QC's with interiors that could carry seats or pallets?

UPS operated five 727-100s with Rolls engines that had swappable cargo and pax interiors. The interiors were supposed to be usable on any of the five aircraft but, well, the holes didn't exactly line up.

Last edited by Airbubba; 7th May 2020 at 01:41.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 20:04
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,457
Received 199 Likes on 98 Posts
It would be very, very difficult to certify a combi to the current regulations - note that all the combi's reference above were certified decades ago. The current regulations for fire protection, passenger/freight segregation, etc. make a combi cert far harder than it used to be. Hard to meet for new production aircraft - probably close to impossible for retrofit of an existing aircraft.
The linked article is short on details, but it doesn't sound like they are talking major structural mods (side cargo door and strengthened floor) - rather it's simply provisioning for a package freighter with hand-loading of the cargo (as others have already been doing with other passenger aircraft). Something that could be readily undone when/if the passenger market comes back.
An A380 Package Freighter conversion will still be handicapped by the A380's low MZFW, capping the total payload at about 85 tons - considerably less than the 777F (~100 tons) with far higher operational costs. Further, I don't even want to think about what the turn time of a A380PF would be with the main deck cargo hand loaded . Probably a niche freighter aircraft at best.
tdracer is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 20:47
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Airbubba
There were some 727 combis made. Reuve Aleutian and Air Mike (Continental Micronesia) operated them I think.

And didn't Eastern and Braniff operate 727 QC's with interiors that could carry seats or pallets?

UPS operated five 727-100s with Rolls engines that had swappable cargo and pax interiors. The interiors were supposed to be usable on any of the five aircraft but, well, the holes didn't exactly line up.
UAL had either 20 or 25 of the 727-100QC (Quick Change) model. Pax seats on pallets or air freight tied down to pallets. The pallets with the passenger seats were stored in a big van like mobile unit.

PSU units folded up when cargo configured. Empty weight was somewhat higher than the standard -100s resulting in a slightly increased burn rate, but fuel was pretty cheap back in the lates 60's and early 70's. When you walked into the cabin you KNEW it was a QC as they were kind of beat-up. Standard freight cargo door on port side.

I remember one particular QC had to be significantly crossed trimmed to fly straight.

One of them crashed on takeoff from KORD (1968?) and was demolished. The 3 pilot crew was injured but all survived. Inadvertent selection of 2deg flaps vice 5deg for takeoff.

Eastern had 727QCs, but I'm not certain about Braniff.
longisland is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 21:10
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Age: 46
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Airbubba
Yes, a combi is something else. Very few have been operated in the U.S. as far as I know. There are a couple of civilian registered B-734 combis currently used to carry nukes and commandos for the Department of Energy. Alaska Airlines operated B-734 combis on its Milk Run route ANC-SEA until 2017.
KLM actually brough a 744 combi back from storage a few weeks ago.
procede is online now  
Old 7th May 2020, 00:19
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern Shores of Lusitania Kingdom
Age: 53
Posts: 859
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Talking about the 380...is this really the end..???

https://simpleflying.com/emirates-a380-is-over/
JanetFlight is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.