Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

BA - Fire Suppression System Malfunction

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

BA - Fire Suppression System Malfunction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd May 2020 | 20:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Stansted
BA - Fire Suppression System Malfunction

Saw this on Facebook, apparently happened today, oops!

Source: AeroNews on Facebook

Image: facebook.com/AeronewsGlobal/photos/pcb.2930760220333392/2930759787000102/?type=3&theater

Last edited by LS737; 3rd May 2020 at 20:22. Reason: I can't attach images due to my number of posts...
LS737 is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd May 2020 | 22:00
  #2 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 2,030
From: Reading, UK
That won't be the first time a foam party has got out of hand.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Reply
Old 3rd May 2020 | 22:30
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 1
From: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Presumably an accident. Pictures from the Facebook post linked above.

Today’s incident from Heathrow airport: a fire suppression system apparently malfunctioned at TBJ or Tech 6, in the hangar where a Boeing 777-200ER (G-YMMB) BA was parked.








Airbubba is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 00:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 961
From: Seat 1A
As we say in Australia... "Mr Hart, What a mess!".
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 07:57
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 935
Likes: 52
From: Scotland
Is the new “bio friendly” blood based foam any better/worse for airframes than AFFF?
Jwscud is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 08:47
  #6 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 405
Likes: 30
From: Freedom Sound
Functional check carried out - "Satis".
esscee is online now  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 08:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: UK
I see no fire. Worked well.
create_it83 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 09:26
  #8 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 22
From: UK
Interesting that the system just spreads a blanket of foam at low level when a fire could start at any height.

In 1993 I was one of the two pilots who took a BA B747-400 down to the new maintenance facility at Cardiff. Everybody there was very proud of the place and we were given a guided tour. We were also shown some pictures of the fire suppression system test during commissioning of the building. This is also a foam system. What was quite amazing was that the hangar in the photograph we were shown had foam that was probably 30' or 40' deep! That would be effective.
M.Mouse is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 09:42
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 103
Likes: 1
From: CYUL
Originally Posted by M.Mouse
Interesting that the system just spreads a blanket of foam at low level when a fire could start at any height.

In 1993 I was one of the two pilots who took a BA B747-400 down to the new maintenance facility at Cardiff. Everybody there was very proud of the place and we were given a guided tour. We were also shown some pictures of the fire suppression system test during commissioning of the building. This is also a foam system. What was quite amazing was that the hangar in the photograph we were shown had foam that was probably 30' or 40' deep! That would be effective.
Something like this? Remember a foam mishap in a USAF hangar around 2012 as well.



admiral ackbar is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 09:45
  #10 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 22
From: UK
That is exactly the sort of image I was shown!
M.Mouse is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 09:51
  #11 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 176
From: The sky
What happens to any injured or immobilised personnel under that foam?
Locked door is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 10:47
  #12 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 22
From: UK
What happens to any injured or immobilised personnel under that foam?
They are far cheaper to replace than the aircraft.
M.Mouse is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 13:01
  #13 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by Locked door
What happens to any injured or immobilised personnel under that foam?
They escape Alex Cruz's cull of BA staff.
cashash is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 15:59
  #14 (permalink)  
bnt
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 755
Likes: 26
From: Dublin, Ireland. (No, I just live here.)
According to some folks on Reddit, where they posted video, the foam system was triggered by someone starting the plane's APU in the hangar.
bnt is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 16:12
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 1
From: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Delta had one of these foam mishaps at LAX five weeks ago.




Airbubba is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 18:27
  #16 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 3
From: Brexitland
Isn't this an example of the system designed to deal with a problem causing more trouble than the problem itself?
Arfur Dent is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 18:58
  #17 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 605
Likes: 25
From: EGLL
Originally Posted by Arfur Dent
Isn't this an example of the system designed to deal with a problem causing more trouble than the problem itself?
(until you see a hangar on fire...)
G-ARZG is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 19:00
  #18 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by Jwscud
Is the new “bio friendly” blood based foam any better/worse for airframes than AFFF?
Dunno 'bout "new"... The blood-based stuff is what the US Navy used before AFFF was invented!
Intruder is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 19:01
  #19 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,672
Likes: 3,316
From: Everett, WA
Originally Posted by Arfur Dent
Isn't this an example of the system designed to deal with a problem causing more trouble than the problem itself?
I think an aircraft on fire inside a hangar (without proper fire suppression) could case quite a bit of trouble.
I have a vague memory of Air France loosing a nearly new 747 when there was a hangar fire back in the 1980s.
tdracer is offline  
Reply
Old 4th May 2020 | 19:11
  #20 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 229
Likes: 2
From: New York
Originally Posted by tdracer
I think an aircraft on fire inside a hangar (without proper fire suppression) could case quite a bit of trouble.
I have a vague memory of Air France loosing a nearly new 747 when there was a hangar fire back in the 1980s.
MX was telling me the other day that LED Beacons can kick off the foam, and the strobes are guaranteed to. Job 1 in the hangar is to pull breakers for every external light..
neilki is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.