Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

A380 + Taxiway = OOPS!

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

A380 + Taxiway = OOPS!

Old 17th Apr 2020, 20:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 978
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Devil A380 + Taxiway = OOPS!

BA A-380

- Ed

Sorry, meleagertoo! I attempted to attach photos to no avail. Try visiting
https://simpleflying.com/heavy-briti...AXFZP4ffPXVk88

If that fails, try searching Chateauroux Airport Incident.

Last edited by cavuman1; 17th Apr 2020 at 22:41. Reason: Add Address
cavuman1 is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 21:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 1,558
Received 98 Likes on 53 Posts
Not visible due to site restrictions.
meleagertoo is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2020, 22:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hawaii
Age: 76
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kind of a non issue. They were being guided into long term parking on the taxiway.
hunbet is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2020, 01:23
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 978
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
You may be right, hunbet, but the damage to the taxiway seems rather substantial in the accompanying photographs. Were you able to follow the link referenced in my initial post? Another consideration is the long-term storage of BA 380's; I think only one or two are left to fly for BA. I wonder if the story is a scam?

- Ed
cavuman1 is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2020, 06:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: International
Age: 76
Posts: 1,394
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The a/c went off the taxiway onto a nil strength shoulder.
B772 is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2020, 07:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,757
Received 179 Likes on 86 Posts
Originally Posted by cavuman1
I think only one or two are left to fly for BA. I wonder if the story is a scam?- Ed
All but two of BA's 12 A380s are at Châteauroux, one is in Manila on heavy maintenance and the last is still at LHR, presumably a Christmas tree by now.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2020, 09:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockport MAN/EGCC
Age: 70
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Doesn’t matter probably won’t be needed again, use for spares to keep the few they might return to service healthy!
David
The AvgasDinosaur is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2020, 10:12
  #8 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 16,969
Received 1,357 Likes on 619 Posts
Doesn’t matter probably won’t be needed again, use for spares to keep the few they might return to service healthy!
David
I wonder.

With airlines potentially having to leave one empty seat between every two passengers has anyone done the maths on how many pax a, say, 777 will be able to carry as compared to an 380? What will that do to operating costs?
ORAC is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2020, 11:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,757
Received 179 Likes on 86 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
With airlines potentially having to leave one empty seat between every two passengers has anyone done the maths on how many pax a, say, 777 will be able to carry as compared to an 380?
You probably don't want passengers sitting immediately in front of or behind other pax, as well as beside them.

So, for example using a narrow-body for simplicity, passengers would sit in A, C and E in one row, then B, D and F in the rows immediately in front and behind. Same on a wide-body, just more letters.

That would make the math/maths relatively simple, in that a maximum of 50% of seats could be occupied (though you may be able to fill a higher percentage of seats in F and C where they are more widely spaced).

Whether that would be an effective way of mitigating the risk is another question ...

Originally Posted by ORAC
What will that do to operating costs?
It wouldn't make much difference to operating costs, but that's probably not what you meant.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2020, 14:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,215
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Probably worth its own thread (for those who like science-magazine math puzzlers)

I thought the spacing still had to be 2m/6 feet in any direction, minimum. I think the max in narrow bodies would be no pax on alternate rows, 2 pax for other rows (window or center)

O = empty seat, X = Pax

XOO OXO
OOO OOO
OXO OXO
OOO OOO
XOO OOX
....etc.

pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2020, 16:26
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: EGLL
Posts: 557
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by B772
The a/c went off the taxiway onto a nil strength shoulder.
BA - 'Bonjour Chateauroux, about our refund for the damaged A380?'

CHR - 'Ah sorry, m' sieur, we can only offer you a voucher for re-use in next 12 months... '
G-ARZG is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2020, 22:25
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pattern_is_full
Probably worth its own thread (for those who like science-magazine math puzzlers)

I thought the spacing still had to be 2m/6 feet in any direction, minimum. I think the max in narrow bodies would be no pax on alternate rows, 2 pax for other rows (window or center)

O = empty seat, X = Pax

XOO OXO
OOO OOO
OXO OXO
OOO OOO
XOO OOX
....etc.

no point even bothering then , that’ll likely make a massive loss
Meester proach is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2020, 10:03
  #13 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 16,969
Received 1,357 Likes on 619 Posts
Simplistically, half the rows empty, 3/6, and one third of the rest, 2/6, gives a pax load of about 30-35%, so tickets three times the price.

(As I said simplistic, as the hold fright will contribute).

Long distance tourist traffic will collapse, but LC carriers such as EasyJet might be able to cope at reduced volumes - an extra £150 on a Summer holiday won’t put everyone off, and the hotel prices will be lower as they will be desperate fir costumers - and it will still be cheaper than hotel costs in the UK fir stsycstions.

My question was more on the lines of do the operating seat costs per mile scale directly across all types?

e.g. If it is cheaper to fly a 90% full 777 than a 70% full A-380, will it still be cheaper to fly a 30% full 777 than a 30% full A-380?
ORAC is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2020, 10:21
  #14 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One option being looked at are , one by one boarding / deplane , special masks plus gloves and disinfecting aircraft before every flight ,no drinks served, adjacent /middle seats free.etc , maybe good for short haul.. Cannot see this on 10+ hours flights ...you cannot drink eat without taking the masks off. . one cough or sneeze, and off you go... . Probably just all ideas from marketing guys in offices making plans ...as to using A380s for short haul.. been discussed and even tried at the beginning , abandoned .
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2020, 12:48
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tring, UK
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
This is the future:



FullWings is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2020, 13:31
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pattern_is_full
Probably worth its own thread (for those who like science-magazine math puzzlers)

I thought the spacing still had to be 2m/6 feet in any direction, minimum. I think the max in narrow bodies would be no pax on alternate rows, 2 pax for other rows (window or center)

O = empty seat, X = Pax

XOO OXO
OOO OOO
OXO OXO
OOO OOO
XOO OOX
....etc.
The X at the bottom left being coughin' corner?
timpara is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.