Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Pax Allegedly Plants Camera in United and Emirates Lavatories

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Pax Allegedly Plants Camera in United and Emirates Lavatories

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Aug 2019, 22:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pax Allegedly Plants Camera in United and Emirates Lavatories

It appears that he left incriminating video of himself planting the device.

"Investigators cross-referenced this video with airport footage obtained by the FBI in San Diego for United Airlines Flight 646 passengers boarding the aircraft and footage of passengers arriving at the airport in Houston."

Halliburton employee accused of hiding camera in first class airplane bathroom

Friday, August 9, 2019 7:02PM
HOUSTON, Texas (KTRK) -- A Houston man who works for Halliburton is accused of planting a camera inside an airplane bathroom and using it to record women.

Choon Ping Lee has been charged with video voyeurism within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
The incident happened May 5 on United Airlines flight 646 from San Diego to Houston.

Authorities say a first class passenger, who is also from Houston, told them she went to the bathroom at one point during the flight and noticed a device with a blue blinking light.

She claimed it was near the cabinet and wall area, close to a door hinge. The device was loosely hanging, but she said she wasn't sure if it was part of the plane.

The passenger grabbed it with a paper towel, walked out of the bathroom and gave it to the flight crew.

According to court documents, federal and local law enforcement cross-referenced video surveillance of their own to track the device to Choon Ping Lee, a native of Malayasia. Lee was arrested Thursday and is being held in a Houston detention facility pending a bond hearing.

Investigators first extracted images from the device that showed a man setting up the camera in a bathroom stall. They identified Lee as a suspect by matching it to clothing he was wearing in surveillance video inside the San Diego and Houston airports.
The allegations came to light after a female passenger seated in the last row of the first class cabin found a device with a blinking blue light near the cabinet, wall and door hinge of the restroom.

“The item was loosely hanging and she wasn't sure if the item was part of the aircraft, but thought it was odd,” a special agent from the FBI explained in a sworn statement. “Once done in the lavatory, the identified female passenger stood up, grabbed the item with a paper towel, walked out of the lavatory and gave it to the flight crew.”

The flight crew handed the object to corporate security officials for United at George Bush Intercontinental airport, who determined it was a video recording device.

The FBI agent stated that in the video footage the man’s face is not distinguishable, but his blue short-sleeved shirt, loose-fitting blue jeans, black leather tennis shoes and jewelry were “distinctive.” He wore a watch on his left wrist and a small bracelet on his right wrist.
Investigators cross-referenced this video with airport footage obtained by the FBI in San Diego for United Airlines Flight 646 passengers boarding the aircraft and footage of passengers arriving at the airport in Houston.

In the airport footage, officials noted the letters NJC appeared on back of the man’s shirt and he wore glasses and carried a black backpack.

Houston Police Department at the Houston airport enhanced photos of the suspect’s face, clothing, shoes and jewelry to identify the man who installed the device in the plane’s lavatory.

Video showed the man, wearing the same distinct clothing, leaving the plane after it landed in Houston.

Houston police then used video footage of the man walking through Bush Airport to help track him down.
He was identified as Lee, a Malaysian citizen. United Airlines Corporate Security confirmed Lee sat in first class on the flight.

FBI Houston recovered deleted files on the device showing another airplane bathroom where at least two women were caught on camera. Authorities discovered that the files were from an Emirates flight, and one of the victims was wearing an Emirates flight crew uniform.

Court papers show the FBI contacted Halliburton, who provided them with Lee's travel information and that he flew on Emirates for work.

Halliburton also shared a real time photo of Lee walking down the hallway at his job site. He was wearing the watch and bracelet that matched the jewelry seen on camera on the United Airlines flight on May 5.

The company issued the following statement: "Halliburton is aware of the situation and is cooperating with the FBI and U.S. Attorney's office in their investigation. We have a robust Code of Business Conduct and expect every employee to abide by the standards contained in the Code and all applicable laws."

Authorities requested a warrant for Lee's arrest. If convicted, he could be fined, spend up to a year in prison or both.


Last edited by Airbubba; 11th Aug 2019 at 00:40.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2019, 23:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,911
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Must say seems a pretty incompetent operator...

How did Emirates get part of this story?
atakacs is online now  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 00:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
and how do they know the intent was to record women, was it broadcasting?
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 00:43
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by atakacs
Must say seems a pretty incompetent operator...

How did Emirates get part of this story?


I inadvertently left out the EK reference in the story, thanks for catching it :

FBI Houston recovered deleted files on the device showing another airplane bathroom where at least two women were caught on camera. Authorities discovered that the files were from an Emirates flight, and one of the victims was wearing an Emirates flight crew uniform.
It appears that this guy commutes from IAH to Halliburton headquarters in DXB for his job of Chief Commercial Counsel Eastern Hemisphere. At least he did...
Airbubba is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 06:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
better for him he was caught at this end of the journey..
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 10:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a blue balloon
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He thought he could film people taking a bath ..
oldchina is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 12:19
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,537
Received 51 Likes on 32 Posts
The footage would undoubtedly have been sold to an internet site specialising in this sort of thing.
krismiler is online now  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 12:43
  #8 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,884
Received 157 Likes on 50 Posts
​​​​​​​With his job.. he needs money?
SOPS is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 13:05
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,825
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by krismiler
The footage would undoubtedly have been sold to an internet site specialising in this sort of thing.
Undoubtedly? Pure speculation on your part.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 13:26
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So far Mr. Lee has been represented by a court provided public defender. He is charged with a violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1801 (a)(b)(1), Video voyeurism, a misdemeanor:

(a) Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, has the intent to capture an image of a private area of an individual without their consent, and knowingly does so under circumstances in which the individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(b) In this section—

(1) the term “capture”, with respect to an image, means to videotape, photograph, film, record by any means, or broadcast;
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1801

Lee has consented to a trial by a magistrate judge in this misdemeanor case.

A copy of the criminal complaint is attached to this post.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Choon Ping Lee Complaint.pdf (143.5 KB, 47 views)
Airbubba is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 15:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Korea
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No mention of "male victims". Are the lavatories on this model not unisex?
Euclideanplane is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 16:57
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On the lake
Age: 82
Posts: 670
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

Must say seems a pretty incompetent operator...
Most cons are not very bright or they wouldn't be in that job!
twochai is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 17:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 706
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Now lots of men get to watch him take a shower.
Fonsini is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 21:27
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,911
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
What kind of sentence can he expect?
atakacs is online now  
Old 11th Aug 2019, 23:05
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by atakacs
What kind of sentence can he expect?
I was wondering the same thing. If he has a green card he can be deported even for a misdemeanor if it is a crime of moral turpitude.

I would think a first time offender would probably get a plea deal for time served, a suspended sentence and a period of supervised release. Also, a couple of years listing in a sex offender registry. As long as the videos stay under court seal and the victims are not identified that may be the end of it.

However, in the post-Jeffrey Epstein media feeding frenzy some Pulitzer seeking reporter may file a motion to unseal the videos and try to find the people from the flights. In that case Lee, the airlines and 'everybody within a ten mile radius of the incidents', as one aviation attorney put it, could be the targets of civil litigation for years to come.

Since Emirates is mentioned as a venue for Lee's video misdeeds I'm not sure he's welcome in Dubai. Also, I don't know how a conviction would affect Mr. Lee's standing with the Malaysian Bar.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2019, 01:30
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Yakima
Posts: 592
Received 213 Likes on 84 Posts
Originally Posted by Euclideanplane
No mention of "male victims". Are the lavatories on this model not unisex?
They're facing away from the camera. At least I would be on a short flight.
Winemaker is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2019, 08:51
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: back out to Grasse
Posts: 557
Received 28 Likes on 12 Posts
Interesting that in travelling First, he might well have hoped to capture an A-Lister (or two!), flagrante dilecto, and then take the opportunity to significantly increase his income.

I suspect the judge may not take a lenient view of this activity.

IG
Imagegear is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2019, 13:37
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Imagegear
Interesting that in travelling First, he might well have hoped to capture an A-Lister (or two!), flagrante dilecto, and then take the opportunity to significantly increase his income.

I suspect the judge may not take a lenient view of this activity.

IG
In my view it isn't worth prosecuting. Just the exposure against the suspect is enough.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2019, 02:48
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,537
Received 51 Likes on 32 Posts
Undoubtedly? Pure speculation on your part.
Videos of this nature are easily found on the internet if that is someones cup of tea. Why go to the expense and risk of collecting your own video when you can get it for free with a few clicks of the mouse ? Some perverts will target a certain woman they like the look of and try to obtain "upskirt" footage of her using a camera concealed in a shopping bag but often the intention is to sell it on for profit to websites charging a subscription fee or which offer free viewing and rely on advertising revenue.
krismiler is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.