Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

A340 Rotation Problems

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

A340 Rotation Problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jul 2019, 19:40
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,907
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Thanks for linking the report. I tried to find it by myself to no avail.
All in all I think that there is an informal consensus that the 340 is somewhat below expectations when it comes to take-off performances. At the same time the type is in service for many years and except for some "close calls" it has not been plagued by TO accidents, so it is probably not that bad. and now that every competent driver is aware of this I hope things should be under control.
atakacs is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2019, 23:28
  #42 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Paisley, Florida USA
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by futurama
I don't know... the engineering calculations and simulations were actually prepared by Airbus, then reviewed by experts from BEA, Air France, and Lufthansa. Furthermore, since Air France & Lufthansa actually implemented operational changes, presumably the analysis was also reviewed by the union safety rep pilots.

But what do they know, they should have just consulted pprune experts who got to the actual root cause even without any access to the data.
This is a forum for ideas, comments and opinions on things aviation, and there should be no sacred cows immune to criticism. The BEA is a respected organization, and its reports and findings are well able to stand up to criticism and discussion. Technical reports are usually subjected to questioning, and from that questioning comes understanding. With all that said, perhaps the opening sentence of my Post #38 stating that the BEA report " ... is not correct", was too declarative. I believe that the wording would have been better stated as " ... is not entirely correct."

Outside questioning of the processes of respectable investigative agencies such as the BEA and NTSB is often quite beneficial. An example of which was the questioning of the initial focus of the NTSB investigation into the crash of UAL 585, paying too much attention to mountain wave "rotor" phenomena, to the exclusion of other possible factors, such as uncommanded rudder movement. Yes, I was one of those questioners way back then, but I'm still no expert on much of anything.

Cheers,
Grog
capngrog is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.