Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Iran Air F100 Fire on Landing Tehran

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Iran Air F100 Fire on Landing Tehran

Old 19th Mar 2019, 20:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 4,712
Iran Air F100 Fire on Landing Tehran



From a Reuters report:

Plane Catches Fire At Iran Airport, 100 Evacuated Unhurt: Report

Pir-Hossein Kolivand said the fire broke out after the aircraft's landing gear did not open properly, and was later brought under control.


Reuters | Updated: March 20, 2019 01:04 IST GENEVA: An airliner caught fire on landing at Tehran's Mehrabad airport on Tuesday but all 100 passengers were evacuated without injury, the head of Iran's emergency department said on state television.

Pir-Hossein Kolivand said the fire broke out after the aircraft's landing gear did not open properly, and was later brought under control.

The airplane was a Fokker 100 belonging to Iran Air, the Fars news agency reported.

The pilot was not able to open the back wheels of the plane and circled the airport attempting to open all the wheels before landing the plane on its body, according to Fars.


Airbubba is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2019, 15:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 876
Some landing video here - https://www.9news.com.au/2019/03/20/...ed-fire-tehran

Looks like the "fire" was just the impressive shower of sparks from the gear-up landing and skid. Dies down rapidly as the aircraft slows. Probably foamed as a precautionary measure (quite rightly).
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2019, 20:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,345
Fokker 100, gear problems, who would have thought it Huh
captplaystation is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2019, 21:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 360
Originally Posted by captplaystation View Post
Fokker 100, gear problems, who would have thought it Huh
We had 9 for over 10 years.
No gear up landings, a couple of inflight shutdowns. Excellent dispatch reliability. Fun to fly.
As long as the engineers were on top of them. .......
Nubboy is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2019, 00:32
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,251
captplaystation, you're not getting confused with the Dash-8 are you?
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2019, 10:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: by the seaside
Age: 69
Posts: 750
Dowty?

Iirc the gear was from the fokker 50.
I was on one of the first courses when it was launched. We fitted DC9 shimmy dampers which only partly solved the problem as at extremely light weights we would get an ossilation and if you weren't strapped in properly you wouldn't be able to hit the brakes. Had it on the first Sunday after the new Munich airport opened and I grounded the aircraft. Ossilation triggered by the joints in the taxi way...like a Belgium or yank motorway.

After KLM at GVA a new gear was developed by Marucci? But after certification, during a flapless landing at max weight demo, it collapsed with the press on board.
Did a low fly past for GVA tower to inspect it after multiple bird strikes...took out a downlock microswitch.
Pussy cat to fly and managed to get 16,700 fpm on the clock once. Wasnt popular with the cabin crew though.
blind pew is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2019, 16:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 48
Originally Posted by blind pew View Post
Wasnt popular with the cabin crew though.
I flew as CC in these. We were trained on this, 733, 734, DC9 etc. and it always worried me that (on ours at least) there were no exits aft of the overwing ones. And they rattled like Hell!
MichaelKPIT is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2019, 16:46
  #9 (permalink)  

Dog Tired
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,644
Good grief. How old are these aircraft? They were in Iran when I flew from KWI 1993 (I think).
fantom is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2019, 17:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 70
Fantom, they were manufactured from 1988 to 1997 with 283 built in total. As of July, 2017 113 were still in use, with significant numbers in Australia and Iran.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fokker_100
PastTense is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2019, 17:26
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: EDDM
Posts: 96
IR has 15 F100 all built between 1990 and 1996. Not really old. Western carriers have older A320s flying...

https://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/...ctive-f100.htm

oliver2002 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2019, 18:28
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 9,785
Originally Posted by blind pew View Post
Iirc the gear was from the fokker 50.
I think (hope) you mean from the F.28. That wouldn't be surprising as the Fokker 100 is, for certification purposes, just an F.28 variant.

Hard to transfer a landing gear from a high-wing turboprop to a low-wing jet.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2019, 21:59
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: by the seaside
Age: 69
Posts: 750
Sounds right thanks...

Just knew it wasnt up to the job..when I grounded the aircraft the trouble shooter arrived and told me he had refused acceptance of the fleet only to be over ruled.
besides the gear, thick wing without slats, aircon compressor under the cockpit, the three position air brake and a nav system that dropped out when you most needed it, it was a good aircraft.
ps forgot about the miniscule freight holds.
blind pew is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2019, 09:18
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,345
And 35 min taken to F350 with a full load CDG-HEL . . . . it could sure come down though . . . and Eco cruise Mach , certainly at 2000 fuel prices, beginning with a 6. Wing was thick but totally intolerant of icing, 2 hull losses due to take off with contamination proved that beyond doubt.
It was ahead of its time for nuisance warnings though, ping, ping ping, ping ping ping anyone.
The ones I flew had only a Loo in the back too, made for one of my most uncomfortable approaches , following holding, and subsequent taxy-in at CDG, couldn't force myself to park up on the taxiway and make the walk of shame. We had to wait for the parking stand too.

Made an interesting 1yr interlude in a 30 yr Boeing career though, till the bank pulled the plug 9 days after 9 11.
captplaystation is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.