Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Cathay 777 damaged in Rome

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Cathay 777 damaged in Rome

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Aug 2018, 16:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cippenham
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cathay 777 damaged in Rome

Just been reading a Cathay Pacific Boeing 777-300 B-KPY has been damaged in Rome this afternoon, with a collision with Lamp post
LHRops is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 16:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From the South China Morning Post:

Cathay Pacific plane hits pole at Rome airport, leaving right wing badly crushed

The Boeing 777-300ER aircraft was being towed by a truck at Leonardo da Vinci – Fiumicino Airport

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 15 August, 2018, 9:56pmUPDATED : Wednesday, 15 August, 2018, 10:26pm

The right wing of a Cathay Pacific Airways Boeing 777 plane was badly crushed after it hit a floodlight pole at Rome airport on Wednesday morning, as the plane was being towed by ground staff.

Cathay Pacific confirmed one of its aircraft “was involved in a towing incident in which one of its wing tips struck a standing pole”.

“The incident occurred when the Boeing 777-300ER aircraft was being towed by a truck operated by a local ground handling agent at the airport,” a spokeswoman said.

Separate images posted on a Rome-based aviation spotting Facebook page showed the wing of the six-year old Hong Kong-registered aircraft “B-KPY” firmly wedged into the pole.


An engineering source at the airline who viewed photos of the incident said the damage was fixable, but it would not be an easy job.

The plane was highly likely to be “grounded for a good while”, the source said, indicating the need for a complex repair job at Leonardo da Vinci–Fiumicino Airport.

The airline is the only one that flies daily between the two cities, and the outbound flight from Hong Kong usually arrives in the morning, with the return flight departing Rome at 1.05pm local time (7.05pm Hong Kong time).

On Wednesday, a notice to passengers due to fly on CX292 said “due to operational constraints, this flight will not be carrying passengers”.

Cathay Pacific said: “The airline is actively arranging alternatives for passengers to travel to their final destinations.”
The cancelled return flight is likely to cause significant disruption for passengers.

The aircraft is one of the newly re-configured Boeing 777s, which has more seats in the form of a 10-abreast arrangement in economy class, allowing it to carry 368 passengers in all. It is one of a handful in service, which means getting a replacement aircraft will be tough.

Given that it is peak summer travel season, rebooking passengers on other flights may also prove challenging. The airline may try to send travellers to London and Paris, where there is more than one Cathay flight a day to Hong Kong.








Airbubba is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 19:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Age: 46
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like HiFly might have another customer for their A380's....
procede is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 19:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CYUL
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What's with all these ground incidents in the past year?
Jet Jockey A4 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 19:32
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Chocolatetown
Age: 63
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nah... a little Duct Tape and Baling Wire.
climber314 is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 20:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 379
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have heard the phrase "wing walker", but I'm beginning to wonder what it's for.
msbbarratt is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 20:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 379
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by procede
Looks like HiFly might have another customer for their A380's....
That could be, well, interesting. Ten abreast 777-300ER becomes a much roomier A380? The passengers will like that. However, they'll like it less when the 777 is repaired and put back into service; it'll kinda accentuate the cramped up nature of Cathay's shiny new offering...
msbbarratt is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 20:22
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 724
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by msbbarratt
I have heard the phrase "wing walker", but I'm beginning to wonder what it's for.
It means you walk away with a piece of wing, which has fallen off.
fox niner is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 21:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Manchester MAN
Posts: 6,644
Received 74 Likes on 46 Posts
Cathay Pacific confirmed one of its aircraft “was involved in a towing incident in which one of its wing tips struck a standing pole”.
Looks more like a "pushing" incident to me!
India Four Two is online now  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 21:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Away from home Rat
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jet Jockey A4
What's with all these ground incidents in the past year?
Is it Swissport? Why use 3 handlers to move an aeroplane when you can damage it with two.
Alber Ratman is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2018, 21:57
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: the City by the Bay
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
‘’ You had One job ....’’
armchairpilot94116 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2018, 09:41
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a bit of a testimony to the strength of their floodlight poles.
ATCO1962 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2018, 13:19
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wonder what the shock loading on the rear corner of the wingbox/rear spar was?
glad rag is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2018, 13:40
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: London/Fort Worth
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by glad rag
Wonder what the shock loading on the rear corner of the wingbox/rear spar was?
Not a lot - the raked wingtip is composite as is the fixed trailing edge panel, so they crumple quite easily. The hard part of the repair is the fixed T/E panel - if it had only hit just a few inches outboard and only damaged the raked wingtip the engineers could have removed that (and the opposite one) and sent the bird on its way.
BAengineer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.