QF94 from Los Angeles to Melbourne Vortex
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wallisellen, Switzerland
Age: 75
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting - I wonder about the 1000-ft altitude difference cited for two planes on the same southwesterly heading. I assume the upset plane was the lower plane (wake vortices sink), and perhaps the leading 'Bus was in the process of its first step-climb from FL320, passing through FL330? Timing is about right, and the extra lift needed in the climb would increase the vortex intensity. 20 nm equals about 2.5 minutes separation, so that makes sense.
EDIT - AvHerald says upset plane actually was SW-bound at FL310(?? - also in step climb?) but indeed the event occurred at about the time the lead plane was also starting its climb from FL320 to FL340.
http://avherald.com/h?article=4b9da5b2&opt=0
EDIT - AvHerald says upset plane actually was SW-bound at FL310(?? - also in step climb?) but indeed the event occurred at about the time the lead plane was also starting its climb from FL320 to FL340.
http://avherald.com/h?article=4b9da5b2&opt=0
"Australian television and radio host Eddie McGuire, who was on the flight, said the plane "jumped up and down for about 10 seconds" and that "somebody described it as the feeling of going over the top of a roller-coaster.""
A somewhat less breathless version by a respected newspaper...
https://www.smh.com.au/business/comp...14-p4zldt.html
A somewhat less breathless version by a respected newspaper...
https://www.smh.com.au/business/comp...14-p4zldt.html
Last edited by JohnMcGhie; 14th Jun 2018 at 05:15. Reason: adding appropriate emphasis
For those not living in Australia, you might be interested to know that he media celebrity Eddie McGuire is know as “Eddie Everywhere”. He certainly lives up to his name, even being on an A380 as it nosedives (sic) towards the Pacific Ocean.
Have to admit that I didn't know there was more wake generated during steady state climb, since lift equals weight in steady state, the same lift as is required in straight and level flight.
I watched Eddie McGuire’s interview on TV this morning. He tried to play it down, despite being pressed by the dopey interviewer about the ‘nosedive’ on several occasions.
He added that the flight over to LA was more uncomfortable due to continual turbulence. Didn’t see that in the media!
Slow aviation news day!
He added that the flight over to LA was more uncomfortable due to continual turbulence. Didn’t see that in the media!
Slow aviation news day!
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: If this is Tuesday, it must be?
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
since lift equals weight in steady state, the same lift as is required in straight and level flight
Wiggy beat me to it!
Last edited by BizJetJock; 14th Jun 2018 at 10:59. Reason: Slowness...
Originally Posted by Pattern is Full
and the extra lift needed in the climb would increase the vortex intensity.
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: BRS/GVA
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not the case, you gain positive vertical acceleration you need more lift than cruise. Also its a not clean profile with more power.
you gain positive vertical acceleration you need more lift than cruise
You are (first approximation) only actually accelerating upwards until you achieve a constant rate of climb (ROC) or as Capn Bloggs describes it, during the pitch up itself (doesn’t matter whether it is a pitch up at takeoff or a pitch up to initiate a cruise climb). Once you’ve established in a steady climb you are climbing upwards but you are not accelerating upwards, and we are back to the possibility/probability of the required “wing lift” being less in the climb than in level flight due to the vertical component of thrust.
OK, yes, transitioning to a climb would put a "knuckle" of increased vortex in the wake momentarily and then return to the "steady state" vortex strength - assuming the climb in thereafter unaccelerated (not a loop-the-loop!). It is highly improbable (but not impossible) that the trailing plane would fly into the preceding vortex exactly at the point where the knuckle exists.
@Capn Bloggs - an aeroplane climbing at a 60° angle will not be in a "steady state" very long - unless it's an F-18. But your point is taken.
@Capn Bloggs - an aeroplane climbing at a 60° angle will not be in a "steady state" very long - unless it's an F-18. But your point is taken.