Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Iran Accident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Feb 2018, 20:05
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas, like a whole other country
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Reportedly WFU due to shortage of spares.
Can you name the source? I'm not meaning to sound doubtful and all, but that is a lot of time for bird to be on the ground if it wasn't properly looked after. Thanks.
Carbon Bootprint is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2018, 20:46
  #22 (permalink)  
txl
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Berlin
Age: 56
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Source

The Guardian reports, citing Iranian media:

An Iranian news website said the plane had recently rejoined the air fleet after seven years of undergoing repairs. “The plane which crashed today faced technical problems midair during a recent flight a few weeks ago,” Roozarooz news reported.

An Instagram post from Aseman Airlines two months ago that announced the plane was back in service after seven years was deleted this morning after the plane crash, Roozarooz reported.
Also, see the tweet by Iranian Aerospace Talk Forum I cited above. This could be sourced from the allegedly deleted instagram post.
txl is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2018, 00:27
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,558
Received 39 Likes on 18 Posts
The missed approach from MDA demands accurately tracking an NDB back bearing. Not every ADF installation does back bearings as well as front bearings.

How many crews today can do a good wind correction on an NDB bearing?

Was there any calibration flown on the approach?

Even more exciting would be flying a missed from as much as 4000' below the MDA. Was calibration for the missed flown from just above the runway?
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2018, 00:52
  #24 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RatherBeFlying
The missed approach from MDA demands accurately tracking an NDB back bearing. Not every ADF installation does back bearings as well as front bearings.

How many crews today can do a good wind correction on an NDB bearing?
The old salt Russians. Dual ADFs on RMIs.

Was there any calibration flown on the approach?
Only Iran knows that.

Even more exciting would be flying a missed from as much as 4000' below the MDA. Was calibration for the missed flown from just above the runway?
That might not be part of Iranian flight inspection specs. Or, many other countries for that matter.

I believe the recent installation of the VOR/DME is evidence that Iran was on the path to improvement at this difficult airport.
aterpster is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2018, 04:02
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Dallas
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hotel Tango
We don't know yet of course but I would very much doubt that aircraft serviceability had any role in this. More likely a scenario relating to weather and procedures.
I agree with you.

The economic sanctions placed on Iran years ago caused quite a few aircraft to be sidelined.
ThreeThreeMike is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2018, 12:57
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Iranian search-and-rescue teams on Tuesday offered the first images of the site of an airplane crash in southern Iran that killed 65 people, with officials hoping to reach the aircraft's "black boxes" to learn exactly what downed the flight.

State television aired footage showing the plane crash site against the side of a snow-covered mountain near Yasuj, some 780 kilometers (485 miles) south of Tehran, Iran's capital from which the Aseman Airlines flight took off on Sunday.

A helicopter pilot interviewed by state television said the crash site appeared to be only 30 meters (100 feet) from a peak on Mount Dena in the Zagros Mountain range.

"Some large parts of the plane, which were labeled with the Aseman company logo, were seen," said the pilot, identified by state TV only as Capt. Soheili.
Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2018, 13:26
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Schiphol
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the wreckage had been found through drone images before the air force's helicopters were deployed.
From now on drone deployment appears to have become a standard tool in both SAR and investigative efforts. Similar use in the Antonov case. And especially helpful in difficult conditions ... Like the high snow in these two 2018 cases. In this case the helicopters could not land and people on foot are the only option. Drones make a search far more efficient and effective which is a great help for those in SAR and contributes to their safety.
A0283 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2018, 14:03
  #28 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What size of drone?
Are we talking 'pilotless aircraft'? - or a portable toylike device?


Edited to add:-
The wreckage was finally spotted by a military drone
G-CPTN is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2018, 14:11
  #29 (permalink)  
ENTREPPRUNEUR
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The 60s
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NDBs?

Originally Posted by RatherBeFlying
Not every ADF installation does back bearings as well as front bearings.
They are Non Directional Beacons, surely?
twistedenginestarter is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2018, 15:20
  #30 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blockage by terrain could limit the use of an NDB. Flight inspection has to verify signal strength for both the approach and missed approach. A weak signal can cause a false bearing.

It will be interesting to learn whether the flight flew the procedure correctly to well below MDA, then did a missed approach.
aterpster is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2018, 15:49
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: The South
Posts: 304
Received 54 Likes on 21 Posts
It's hard not to feel for this crew. Who knows if they pushed limits but the captain was a veteran and presumably familiar with both airport and the limitations of the approach; as sad end to what was probably a distinguished career.


Not the type of approach facility I would want to deal with in those conditions; especially when they could have had a VOR DME approach there. Was there radar cover in the area or where they expected to let down using own nav? That could explain the end result if the aircraft only had basic kit.
Timmy Tomkins is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2018, 16:32
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,746
Received 151 Likes on 75 Posts
Originally Posted by RatherBeFlying
The missed approach from MDA demands accurately tracking an NDB back bearing. Not every ADF installation does back bearings as well as front bearings.

How many crews today can do a good wind correction on an NDB bearing?

Was there any calibration flown on the approach?

Even more exciting would be flying a missed from as much as 4000' below the MDA. Was calibration for the missed flown from just above the runway?
An ADF That doesn't allow tracking outbound from the NDB?
How the heck would you do an NDB approach?
albatross is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2018, 17:02
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I think the poor chap is getting confused with a Back Course ILS. He obviously has never flown an NDB let down in his life (unlike me).
JW411 is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2018, 02:09
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Russia
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Europian Datum 1950 is using in Iran. The height difference from WGS-84 is 30.24 meters.
Therefore, I think it started to decline about 1 km earlier. The distance along the axis of the runway differs by approximately 60 meters (2 arc seconds).
Sorry, the distance along the axis of the runway differs by approximately 30 meters ( abt 1 arc seconds).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Iran1.jpg (95.9 KB, 161 views)
File Type: png
geoid-height-estimation.png (116.7 KB, 161 views)

Last edited by T28B; 21st Feb 2018 at 02:34. Reason: added erratum
Patanom is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2018, 03:13
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands
Age: 74
Posts: 37
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aterpster
Jeppesen has only two charts. [...]
On that approach chart 16-1 (dated 20 Oct 17) the minimum altitude during the teardrop turn is given as 12,500 for category A and B aircraft, but 11,400 for the faster C and D categories. I would expect that to be the other way around, i.e. the higher altitude for the faster airplanes with their wider turning radius, as well as their outbound course that is aimed closer to the mountain range in the east.
Plumb Bob is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2018, 00:44
  #36 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That occurred to me, too. It would be interesting to see state source; i.e., the official Iranian chart in their AIP. I doubt that is available on-line, though.

Jeppesen is careful, but not perfect.

In any case, the accident did not occur in the area of the base leg.
aterpster is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2018, 02:57
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,413
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Actually, the Iran AIP is online, but I couldn’t access the charts on an iPad, requires desktop.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2018, 04:35
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are Non Directional Beacons, surely?

not the onboard equipment
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2018, 05:24
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a big Lake
Age: 81
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Everyone is discussing the interesting approach, but it is not clear to me that the aircraft even reached the Yasouj NDB to commence the approach.

Those are some serious Mountains north of Yasouj, and tall mountains, strong winds can create extreme problems in maintaining altitude.

So far, information on the route of the flight has been pretty sketchy.
Machinbird is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2018, 08:22
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
ironbutt57:

Exactly so; the NDB is the bit on the ground and the ADF is the bit in the aircraft.
JW411 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.