Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Air China loses power to cabin, comms, navigation, and RADAR?

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Air China loses power to cabin, comms, navigation, and RADAR?

Old 16th Dec 2017, 20:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NZ
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air China loses power to cabin, comms, navigation, and RADAR?

https://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/trave...engine-failure

Seems like some rather desireable avionics lost for what appears to be the loss of just one engine (would have thought the remaining engine and APU would be more than capable of covering the deficit). Is this more likely to just be the media getting it wrong again?
BugSmasher1960 is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2017, 21:26
  #2 (permalink)  
Water Wings
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have some issues with the report. Something has obviously happened but the aircraft (from avherald) returned to Auckland at FL330 which would be a pretty darn impressive engine out drift down altitude to maintain!

Incident: Air China B789 over Pacific on Dec 15th 2017, half lit, half dark
 
Old 16th Dec 2017, 21:30
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: US
Age: 66
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
The press has it wrong. It is normal in a twin to load shed non essential electrical systems after a engine failure. I suspect that is what happened.
Sailvi767 is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2017, 21:34
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NZ
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My thoughts exactly. With APU available, would it not be reasonable to expect ALL cockpit avionics to remain functional?
BugSmasher1960 is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2017, 22:13
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nav, Comms, and radar are all essential AC powered devices. These loads would not be shed during SE OPS. The operating engine generator automatically powers the failed engine's AC bus and a manual bus tie can be initiated if needed.

The only common scenario where the above mentioned avionics would be lost is if there was an AC bus failure, or electrical control box failure, however, it would only be half as the remaining side (NAV1 or NAV2, etc) would remain powered.

As essential electrical equipment*, communication radios, navigation gear, and radar would be unpowered in the case of the loss of GEN1, GEN2 and the APU generator or a bus failure as mentioned above. Even in such an emergency electrical configuration, there typically remains at least one COM, one NAV unit, etc operational. This arrangement is fairly standard across all large transport category aircraft.

*with the exception of the HF radios and SATCOM, if fitted.
vapilot2004 is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2017, 22:36
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NZ
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just as I thought.

So to lose com and nav they're going to have to lose both engines, APU, RAT, and the battery - at which point they probably have more pressing issues to deal with. Unless as you say, some very unusual bus / switching issues.
BugSmasher1960 is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2017, 22:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Europe
Age: 45
Posts: 625
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or, alternatively, the 'all'-electric architecture of the 787 has just shown us a failure mode which shouldn't be possible. Then again, the battery was supposed to be fail-safe too. Until it wasn't.

The 'report' from passengers saying all lights went out on the same side as the shut-down engine are, if correct, certainly very interesting. That probably shouldn't be possible either.
SMT Member is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2017, 23:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 349
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There is always the possibility that some of the problems resulted from the reaction of the crew.
And the first link shows a piccie of a 777, whereas the second mentions that it was a 789... can't anybody get anything right?
fleigle is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2017, 02:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NZ
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Accuracy and balance have never been strong points when it comes to the media; even moreso with aviation "articles".
Needle Knocker is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2017, 08:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,863
Received 221 Likes on 104 Posts
Avherald initially reported it as a "787-900" (and GEnx-powered!).

Engine type now corrected to Trent 1000.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2017, 08:58
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
The AvHerald report is slightly misleading, “ the left hand engine failed causing the loss of electrical power for ...”.
An engine shutdon usually involves loss of a generator, but not the consequential loss of electrical systems as described, particularly if this was an ETOPS rated aircraft.
PEI_3721 is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2017, 10:40
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: It used to be an island...
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So it's either a bizarre aircraft system failure or a bizarre aircraft pilot failure. At least it will be investigated by the Kiwis, who are more likely to produce a useful report than some other authorities on the way to Beijing.
nicolai is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2017, 13:57
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It doesn't say it lost ALL the comms, does it?
Possibly just had a dead bus (not that that's good after an engine fails on a twin), shutting down either the nr 1's or the other sets..
Should be easy to find out for some of the ATC tape wizards, there's probably one in Auckland
golfyankeesierra is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2017, 15:42
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: BC
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sailvi767
The press has it wrong. It is normal in a twin to load shed non essential electrical systems after a engine failure. I suspect that is what happened.
Well, having flown this airplane, I can assure you that there is no ‘load-shed’ to half the aircraft. There is something else at fault here.
777AV8R is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.