Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

SA Airlink RJ85 near Johannesburg on Nov 8th 2017, uncontained engine failure takes o

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

SA Airlink RJ85 near Johannesburg on Nov 8th 2017, uncontained engine failure takes o

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Nov 2017, 06:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Africa
Age: 49
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SA Airlink RJ85 near Johannesburg on Nov 8th 2017, uncontained engine failure takes o

I can't believe no one is talking about this here. Africa really is off the radar!

Accident: SA Airlink RJ85 near Johannesburg on Nov 8th 2017, uncontained engine failure takes out two engines

UPDATE: Airlink passenger shares account of 'massive explosion' ahead of emergency landing | Traveller24
wabulabantu is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 09:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Africa
Age: 75
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, it's not even on the Africa forum yet, so why would it be on this forum if the Africans don't even think it's worth a mention?
hexboy is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 10:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They dont have an equivalent of the Daily Fail to create the usual "screaming passengers thought they were going to die" headlines so nobody noticed.

Double engine fail nicely handled by the crew, everyone walked away - well done.
The Ancient Geek is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 10:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Schiphol
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pictures in the article are recommended though. As their are more failures than good pictures.

The other article has comments from a pax (not a happy clapper). Gives you an idea about of required 'reassurance' for that category of passengers. Time for PRM - Passenger Reassurance Management?
A0283 is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 11:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,501
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
The crew did a very good job, I take my hat off to you
brakedwell is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2017, 14:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMG-20171109-WA0002.jpg

ECE64605-6AEE-4157-9C42-035D695D3CD8.jpeg
JCO7 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2017, 17:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: In front of the fridge, rescuing a trapped can of beer
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am SLF only so you might excuse my comment. Isn't it that pilots are trained for this kind of situation? So it is their job to bring the aircraft down to the ground safely. Nothing special for them....just saying
winter959 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2017, 20:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: at the edge of the alps
Posts: 447
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Engine failures are indeed trained quite often, although a non-contained failure like this can lead to multiple system failures if the fragments shatter something essential. Multiple failures (including multiple engine failures) are not trained as frequently. Simulator trained failures tend to be a bit more "clear-cut" than real life as simulator designers select specific malfunctions and try to implement them in a plausible way. "Real life" indications, sounds, vibrations may be different and some effects of shredded metal (like intense vibrations) are hard to simulate.

The basic chance for a pilot to experience an actual engine failure during his/her career is reportedly about 50:50, so the chance of experiencing something like this must be even less. Flying 4-engined airplanes increases the chance a bit, of course ;-)

So while the pilots who brought this wounded bird back safely just did their job they sure had their hands full and more than a good day's work set out for them. While we prepare for events like this during our whole pilot life, we're quite happy to finish our last flight having shut down engines on the ground only.
Alpine Flyer is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2017, 21:58
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 85
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
As the designer responsible for an uncontained engine failure (on the test bed) some 55 years ago, that was about the most exciting moment of my life.
To have a similar failure in a static aeroplane (pilot action irrelevant except to instruct an evac after the event) would be like playing Russian roulette.
To have such a failure in a moving/airborne plane is more like playing Russian roulette with a revolver with an unknown number of bullets loaded.
Skill plus luck required.
DType is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2017, 02:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is it good practice to continue an hour to destination after catastrophic engine failure?
etudiant is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2017, 11:49
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Direction of Failure

Is it just random chance that the failed Blades/Disc exited away from the Aircraft, rather than towards it? Would that have been worse? The shrapnel spray pattern on the outer engine cowling looks frightening....
Mr Wuli is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2017, 16:16
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There have been lots of data studies on uncontained failures against the variables versus occurrence. The design criteria is to minimize against catastrophic results and includes crew actions as part of the minimization.

So far I don't see anything in this event that is outside the study experience given that it was an uncontained event.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2017, 14:22
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On the lake
Age: 82
Posts: 670
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it just random chance that the failed Blades/Disc exited away from the Aircraft
There would be much more damage (to the nacelle, at least) if this had been a disc failure.
twochai is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 10:27
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Middlesex UK
Age: 80
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re- flying on or returning. If the choice was return to Harare (Mugabeville) or going on the Jo'burg (more facilites, more stable}, I think the crew made right choice. Well done, crew!
Mahonda is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2017, 18:59
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Switzerland
Age: 60
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here below some pictures from HB-IXU, a Avro RJ-100 from Swiss in August 2004
Exactly the same story, uncontained engine failure of the engine No2 with debris hitting the engine No1

The aircraft was enroute from Amsterdam to Zurich and diverted to Francfort
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
1.jpg (374.5 KB, 67 views)
File Type: jpg
2.jpg (373.3 KB, 58 views)
File Type: jpg
3.jpg (353.3 KB, 61 views)
File Type: jpg
4.jpg (388.6 KB, 58 views)
File Type: jpg
5.jpg (353.2 KB, 62 views)
Greg Boyington is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.